FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2919100596> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2919100596 abstract "To date, no single colorectal cancer (CRC) screening strategy has been determined to be applicable worldwide. In China, a CRC screening protocol that combines double fecal immunochemical tests (FITs) and a high-risk factor questionnaire (HRFQ) as the first stage of screening and colonoscopy as the second stage of screening (scenario A) was adapted by the Chinese Ministry of Health in 2006. However, applying this CRC screening protocol nationally remains difficult because its effectiveness and convenience are controversial. This study evaluated the effects of subitems of the CRC screening protocol in China. CRC screening results (scenario A) from Jiashan County, China, (2007–2009) were used to analyze the detection rates of CRC and advanced neoplasms as well as the cost-effectiveness of the protocol. Scenario A was divided into scenarios B–G (by selecting some items at the first stage of screening) for analysis. Compared with scenario A, removing the whole HRFQ (scenario F) reduced advanced neoplasm and adenoma detections by 29.8 and 41.2%, respectively, whereas the whole HRFQ accounted for 10.1% of the total screening cost. Removing FITs (scenario G) reduced CRC, advanced neoplasm and adenoma detections by 71.8, 56.9 and 47.7%, respectively, and the costs per case of CRC and advanced neoplasm were 82.0 and 19.1% higher, respectively, than those in scenario A. In scenarios B–E (deleting some high-risk factor questions on the HRFQ), the odds ratios (ORs) of the detection rates and costs per CRC, advanced neoplasm, adenoma, and neoplasm case were near 1.00. Scenarios C and D reduced the high-risk population and total screening costs by less than 6.0 and 4.1%, respectively. Scenarios E and B (FITs and a personal history of cancer or colorectal adenoma were reserved) reduced the high-risk population by 17.6 and 24.2% and the total screening costs by 11.2 and 15.4%, respectively, while the numbers of CRC cases were not missed, and advanced neoplasms detected decreased by only 5 and 11%, respectively. The results of this study demonstrate that FITs and a personal history of colorectal adenoma are the most effective items in the Chinese CRC screening protocol." @default.
• W2919100596 created "2019-03-11" @default.
• W2919100596 creator A5001964595 @default.
• W2919100596 creator A5018806880 @default.
• W2919100596 creator A5024857968 @default.
• W2919100596 creator A5041665648 @default.
• W2919100596 creator A5056090401 @default.
• W2919100596 creator A5081325802 @default.
• W2919100596 date "2019-01-10" @default.
• W2919100596 modified "2023-10-16" @default.
• W2919100596 title "Effects of subitems in the colorectal cancer screening protocol on the Chinese colorectal cancer screening program: an analysis based on natural community screening results" @default.
• W2919100596 cites W1492045079 @default.
• W2919100596 cites W1906897228 @default.
• W2919100596 cites W2010342193 @default.
• W2919100596 cites W2023687830 @default.
• W2919100596 cites W2029070532 @default.
• W2919100596 cites W2046686567 @default.
• W2919100596 cites W2052496581 @default.
• W2919100596 cites W2065560068 @default.
• W2919100596 cites W2078296061 @default.
• W2919100596 cites W2092831454 @default.
• W2919100596 cites W2115132525 @default.
• W2919100596 cites W2118835794 @default.
• W2919100596 cites W2144608591 @default.
• W2919100596 cites W2145602937 @default.
• W2919100596 cites W2147313781 @default.
• W2919100596 cites W2188891293 @default.
• W2919100596 cites W2272984102 @default.
• W2919100596 cites W2283507024 @default.
• W2919100596 cites W2330035852 @default.
• W2919100596 cites W2345625186 @default.
• W2919100596 cites W2594373254 @default.
• W2919100596 cites W2915317546 @default.
• W2919100596 cites W2915602243 @default.
• W2919100596 doi "https://doi.org/10.1186/s12885-018-5191-y" @default.
• W2919100596 hasPubMedCentralId "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/6327475" @default.
• W2919100596 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/30630450" @default.
• W2919100596 hasPublicationYear "2019" @default.
• W2919100596 type Work @default.
• W2919100596 sameAs 2919100596 @default.
• W2919100596 citedByCount "10" @default.
• W2919100596 countsByYear W29191005962020 @default.
• W2919100596 countsByYear W29191005962021 @default.
• W2919100596 countsByYear W29191005962022 @default.
• W2919100596 countsByYear W29191005962023 @default.
• W2919100596 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2919100596 hasAuthorship W2919100596A5001964595 @default.
• W2919100596 hasAuthorship W2919100596A5018806880 @default.
• W2919100596 hasAuthorship W2919100596A5024857968 @default.
• W2919100596 hasAuthorship W2919100596A5041665648 @default.
• W2919100596 hasAuthorship W2919100596A5056090401 @default.
• W2919100596 hasAuthorship W2919100596A5081325802 @default.
• W2919100596 hasBestOaLocation W29191005961 @default.
• W2919100596 hasConcept C121608353 @default.
• W2919100596 hasConcept C126322002 @default.
• W2919100596 hasConcept C142724271 @default.
• W2919100596 hasConcept C143998085 @default.
• W2919100596 hasConcept C146357865 @default.
• W2919100596 hasConcept C151730666 @default.
• W2919100596 hasConcept C156957248 @default.
• W2919100596 hasConcept C204787440 @default.
• W2919100596 hasConcept C23131810 @default.
• W2919100596 hasConcept C2777428134 @default.
• W2919100596 hasConcept C2778435480 @default.
• W2919100596 hasConcept C2780385302 @default.
• W2919100596 hasConcept C526805850 @default.
• W2919100596 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W2919100596 hasConcept C86803240 @default.
• W2919100596 hasConceptScore W2919100596C121608353 @default.
• W2919100596 hasConceptScore W2919100596C126322002 @default.
• W2919100596 hasConceptScore W2919100596C142724271 @default.
• W2919100596 hasConceptScore W2919100596C143998085 @default.
• W2919100596 hasConceptScore W2919100596C146357865 @default.
• W2919100596 hasConceptScore W2919100596C151730666 @default.
• W2919100596 hasConceptScore W2919100596C156957248 @default.
• W2919100596 hasConceptScore W2919100596C204787440 @default.
• W2919100596 hasConceptScore W2919100596C23131810 @default.
• W2919100596 hasConceptScore W2919100596C2777428134 @default.
• W2919100596 hasConceptScore W2919100596C2778435480 @default.
• W2919100596 hasConceptScore W2919100596C2780385302 @default.
• W2919100596 hasConceptScore W2919100596C526805850 @default.
• W2919100596 hasConceptScore W2919100596C71924100 @default.
• W2919100596 hasConceptScore W2919100596C86803240 @default.
• W2919100596 hasIssue "1" @default.
• W2919100596 hasLocation W29191005961 @default.
• W2919100596 hasLocation W29191005962 @default.
• W2919100596 hasLocation W29191005963 @default.
• W2919100596 hasLocation W29191005964 @default.
• W2919100596 hasLocation W29191005965 @default.
• W2919100596 hasOpenAccess W2919100596 @default.
• W2919100596 hasPrimaryLocation W29191005961 @default.
• W2919100596 hasRelatedWork W11665586 @default.
• W2919100596 hasRelatedWork W2014695763 @default.
• W2919100596 hasRelatedWork W2074414654 @default.
• W2919100596 hasRelatedWork W2147083887 @default.
• W2919100596 hasRelatedWork W2186917042 @default.
• W2919100596 hasRelatedWork W2416484444 @default.
• W2919100596 hasRelatedWork W2417774362 @default.
• W2919100596 hasRelatedWork W2601887321 @default.
• W2919100596 hasRelatedWork W2944981773 @default.

• next