FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2920221217> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2920221217 endingPage "e11842" @default.
• W2920221217 startingPage "e11842" @default.
• W2920221217 abstract "A mobile-based consultation service, or telehealth, can be used for remote consultations with health care professionals for screening, self-care management, and referral. In rural Bangladesh, where there is high demand for scarce male and even scarcer female doctors, remote consultations may help women seeking maternal and child health care. Aponjon is a mHealth service in Bangladesh that provides weekly voice or text messages to pregnant women, new mothers, and family members on various aspects of maternal, neonatal, and infant health. Subscribers can also access a dedicated 24*7 call center to discuss maternal, neonatal, and infant health or emergencies with medically trained doctors. The service provides advice, primary diagnoses, prescriptions, and referrals to subscriber callers.We investigated the Aponjon service to understand access, acceptability, usability, benefits, and challenges of a mobile phone-based consultation service.We conducted call log data analysis for September to November 2015 to understand how many unique subscribers accessed the service, who accessed the service, the geographical distribution of callers, and the purpose of the calls. We also conducted a qualitative exploratory substudy of eight married women and eight married men who were subscribers to and accessed the service during this time to understand their experiences. We interviewed 11 doctors from the same service who provided phone consultations to subscribers.Approximately 3894 unique subscribers accessed the service for single or multiple consultations during the study period; 68.36% (2662/3894) of subscribers were from rural households, and 53.00% (2064/3894) of calls were made by pregnant women or new mothers. Approximately 96.08% (5081/5288) calls were nonurgent, 2.69% (142/5288) semiurgent, and 1.23% (65/5288) urgent. Almost 64.7% (134/207) semiurgent or urgent calls came between 8 PM and 8 AM. Callers found the consultation service trustworthy, cost-effective, and convenient. The doctors dispelled misconceptions and promoted good health care practices, regular health check-ups, and responsible use of medicine. They helped families understand the severity of sicknesses and advised them to seek care at health facilities for semiurgent or urgent conditions. The service lacked a pro-poor policy to support talk times of subscribers from poor households and a proper referral system to help patients find the right care at the right facilities.Although a regular messaging service is constrained by a one-way communication system, this service using the same platform, gave subscribers access to an abbreviated consultation with medical doctors. The consultations provided subscribers with valued medical advice and support, although they were limited in their population reach and their integration into the wider medical system. Further research is required to understand the impact of advice and referral, cost-effectiveness, and willingness to pay for mHealth consultation services, but this research suggests that these services should be supported or even expanded." @default.
• W2920221217 created "2019-03-11" @default.
• W2920221217 creator A5028925040 @default.
• W2920221217 creator A5029122036 @default.
• W2920221217 creator A5037039323 @default.
• W2920221217 creator A5075526297 @default.
• W2920221217 date "2019-04-22" @default.
• W2920221217 modified "2023-10-11" @default.
• W2920221217 title "Patients’ and Doctors’ Perceptions of a Mobile Phone–Based Consultation Service for Maternal, Neonatal, and Infant Health Care in Bangladesh: A Mixed-Methods Study" @default.
• W2920221217 cites W1818699214 @default.
• W2920221217 cites W1868991462 @default.
• W2920221217 cites W1970610019 @default.
• W2920221217 cites W1978116440 @default.
• W2920221217 cites W1979290264 @default.
• W2920221217 cites W1982971874 @default.
• W2920221217 cites W1987614881 @default.
• W2920221217 cites W1990611024 @default.
• W2920221217 cites W2013942770 @default.
• W2920221217 cites W2030290181 @default.
• W2920221217 cites W2053287375 @default.
• W2920221217 cites W2058924226 @default.
• W2920221217 cites W2068071845 @default.
• W2920221217 cites W2085028749 @default.
• W2920221217 cites W2095109714 @default.
• W2920221217 cites W2099019068 @default.
• W2920221217 cites W2104607774 @default.
• W2920221217 cites W2134033197 @default.
• W2920221217 cites W2134668324 @default.
• W2920221217 cites W2135644233 @default.
• W2920221217 cites W2136709565 @default.
• W2920221217 cites W2142852497 @default.
• W2920221217 cites W2149098154 @default.
• W2920221217 cites W2156951647 @default.
• W2920221217 cites W2161706147 @default.
• W2920221217 cites W2228033673 @default.
• W2920221217 cites W2257301905 @default.
• W2920221217 cites W2345359603 @default.
• W2920221217 cites W2410807790 @default.
• W2920221217 cites W2414022139 @default.
• W2920221217 cites W2416836315 @default.
• W2920221217 cites W2461361377 @default.
• W2920221217 cites W2526066647 @default.
• W2920221217 cites W2575955257 @default.
• W2920221217 cites W2599951679 @default.
• W2920221217 cites W2600343230 @default.
• W2920221217 cites W2603541511 @default.
• W2920221217 cites W2606541564 @default.
• W2920221217 cites W2614548615 @default.
• W2920221217 cites W2663694840 @default.
• W2920221217 cites W2742195111 @default.
• W2920221217 cites W2743419146 @default.
• W2920221217 cites W2749508768 @default.
• W2920221217 cites W2750367135 @default.
• W2920221217 cites W2754799758 @default.
• W2920221217 cites W2765211309 @default.
• W2920221217 cites W2783197341 @default.
• W2920221217 cites W2786009791 @default.
• W2920221217 cites W2800933043 @default.
• W2920221217 cites W2801774192 @default.
• W2920221217 cites W2891377710 @default.
• W2920221217 cites W2895894734 @default.
• W2920221217 doi "https://doi.org/10.2196/11842" @default.
• W2920221217 hasPubMedCentralId "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/6658262" @default.
• W2920221217 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/31008716" @default.
• W2920221217 hasPublicationYear "2019" @default.
• W2920221217 type Work @default.
• W2920221217 sameAs 2920221217 @default.
• W2920221217 citedByCount "32" @default.
• W2920221217 countsByYear W29202212172019 @default.
• W2920221217 countsByYear W29202212172020 @default.
• W2920221217 countsByYear W29202212172021 @default.
• W2920221217 countsByYear W29202212172022 @default.
• W2920221217 countsByYear W29202212172023 @default.
• W2920221217 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2920221217 hasAuthorship W2920221217A5028925040 @default.
• W2920221217 hasAuthorship W2920221217A5029122036 @default.
• W2920221217 hasAuthorship W2920221217A5037039323 @default.
• W2920221217 hasAuthorship W2920221217A5075526297 @default.
• W2920221217 hasBestOaLocation W29202212171 @default.
• W2920221217 hasConcept C108827166 @default.
• W2920221217 hasConcept C116537 @default.
• W2920221217 hasConcept C138885662 @default.
• W2920221217 hasConcept C144133560 @default.
• W2920221217 hasConcept C15744967 @default.
• W2920221217 hasConcept C159110408 @default.
• W2920221217 hasConcept C160735492 @default.
• W2920221217 hasConcept C162324750 @default.
• W2920221217 hasConcept C162853370 @default.
• W2920221217 hasConcept C27415008 @default.
• W2920221217 hasConcept C2776135927 @default.
• W2920221217 hasConcept C2777421447 @default.
• W2920221217 hasConcept C2778707766 @default.
• W2920221217 hasConcept C2779363104 @default.
• W2920221217 hasConcept C2779891985 @default.
• W2920221217 hasConcept C2780378061 @default.
• W2920221217 hasConcept C2781050511 @default.
• W2920221217 hasConcept C41008148 @default.
• W2920221217 hasConcept C41895202 @default.

• next