FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2920242575> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2920242575 endingPage "1210.e7" @default.
• W2920242575 startingPage "1210.e1" @default.
• W2920242575 abstract "Purpose The literature does not present any consensus on a uniform treatment plan for odontogenic keratocysts (OKCs) and does not provide adequate evidence for determining which modality is most effective in lowering morbidity or preventing recurrence. The purpose of this study was to compare the effectiveness of surgical treatment based on a 1- versus 2-step protocol. Materials and Methods The authors designed and implemented a retrospective cohort study and enrolled a sample of patients diagnosed with OKC from 1991 through 2018. The medical records of all cases were retrieved from files of the Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery Division of the Piracicaba Dental School (Piracicaba, Brazil). The predictor variable was treatment group (1- vs 2-step protocol). Statistical analysis was performed using Kaplan-Meier analysis, Mantel-Cox log-rank test, and proportional hazard regression analysis. Results The sample was composed of 72 patients (38 male) with a mean age of 40.72 years. Thirteen patients received 1-step treatment and 59 received 2-step treatment. The complex composed of the body, angle, and mandibular ramus was the site most frequently affected. In the individual Kaplan-Meier analysis for each presented variable only involved tooth was significant (P = .0128 by log-rank test), with the risk of relapse 4.23 times higher for the involved tooth than for the non-involved tooth. Conclusion The 1- and 2-step protocols for treatment of OKCs are safe and appropriate as the first treatment option, offering a conservative and effective option with low morbidity. Treatment protocols associated with systematic monitoring promote a better quality of life for patients with low potential for complications. The literature does not present any consensus on a uniform treatment plan for odontogenic keratocysts (OKCs) and does not provide adequate evidence for determining which modality is most effective in lowering morbidity or preventing recurrence. The purpose of this study was to compare the effectiveness of surgical treatment based on a 1- versus 2-step protocol. The authors designed and implemented a retrospective cohort study and enrolled a sample of patients diagnosed with OKC from 1991 through 2018. The medical records of all cases were retrieved from files of the Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery Division of the Piracicaba Dental School (Piracicaba, Brazil). The predictor variable was treatment group (1- vs 2-step protocol). Statistical analysis was performed using Kaplan-Meier analysis, Mantel-Cox log-rank test, and proportional hazard regression analysis. The sample was composed of 72 patients (38 male) with a mean age of 40.72 years. Thirteen patients received 1-step treatment and 59 received 2-step treatment. The complex composed of the body, angle, and mandibular ramus was the site most frequently affected. In the individual Kaplan-Meier analysis for each presented variable only involved tooth was significant (P = .0128 by log-rank test), with the risk of relapse 4.23 times higher for the involved tooth than for the non-involved tooth. The 1- and 2-step protocols for treatment of OKCs are safe and appropriate as the first treatment option, offering a conservative and effective option with low morbidity. Treatment protocols associated with systematic monitoring promote a better quality of life for patients with low potential for complications." @default.
• W2920242575 created "2019-03-11" @default.
• W2920242575 creator A5002132103 @default.
• W2920242575 creator A5014200223 @default.
• W2920242575 creator A5066619956 @default.
• W2920242575 creator A5068053855 @default.
• W2920242575 creator A5082619878 @default.
• W2920242575 date "2019-06-01" @default.
• W2920242575 modified "2023-10-16" @default.
• W2920242575 title "Is Surgical Treatment Based on a 1-Step or 2-Step Protocol Effective in Managing the Odontogenic Keratocyst?" @default.
• W2920242575 cites W1981214993 @default.
• W2920242575 cites W1991899482 @default.
• W2920242575 cites W2009852632 @default.
• W2920242575 cites W2019600173 @default.
• W2920242575 cites W2024094746 @default.
• W2920242575 cites W2036769803 @default.
• W2920242575 cites W2046261954 @default.
• W2920242575 cites W2065031277 @default.
• W2920242575 cites W2065543239 @default.
• W2920242575 cites W2085320723 @default.
• W2920242575 cites W2104991607 @default.
• W2920242575 cites W2132810015 @default.
• W2920242575 cites W2135057618 @default.
• W2920242575 cites W2138252109 @default.
• W2920242575 cites W2146057357 @default.
• W2920242575 cites W2164167027 @default.
• W2920242575 cites W2594592653 @default.
• W2920242575 doi "https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joms.2019.02.040" @default.
• W2920242575 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/30928319" @default.
• W2920242575 hasPublicationYear "2019" @default.
• W2920242575 type Work @default.
• W2920242575 sameAs 2920242575 @default.
• W2920242575 citedByCount "6" @default.
• W2920242575 countsByYear W29202425752019 @default.
• W2920242575 countsByYear W29202425752020 @default.
• W2920242575 countsByYear W29202425752021 @default.
• W2920242575 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2920242575 hasAuthorship W2920242575A5002132103 @default.
• W2920242575 hasAuthorship W2920242575A5014200223 @default.
• W2920242575 hasAuthorship W2920242575A5066619956 @default.
• W2920242575 hasAuthorship W2920242575A5068053855 @default.
• W2920242575 hasAuthorship W2920242575A5082619878 @default.
• W2920242575 hasConcept C10515644 @default.
• W2920242575 hasConcept C126322002 @default.
• W2920242575 hasConcept C141071460 @default.
• W2920242575 hasConcept C142724271 @default.
• W2920242575 hasConcept C167135981 @default.
• W2920242575 hasConcept C199343813 @default.
• W2920242575 hasConcept C204787440 @default.
• W2920242575 hasConcept C2778125672 @default.
• W2920242575 hasConcept C2780385302 @default.
• W2920242575 hasConcept C2781186661 @default.
• W2920242575 hasConcept C50382708 @default.
• W2920242575 hasConcept C66339696 @default.
• W2920242575 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W2920242575 hasConcept C72563966 @default.
• W2920242575 hasConceptScore W2920242575C10515644 @default.
• W2920242575 hasConceptScore W2920242575C126322002 @default.
• W2920242575 hasConceptScore W2920242575C141071460 @default.
• W2920242575 hasConceptScore W2920242575C142724271 @default.
• W2920242575 hasConceptScore W2920242575C167135981 @default.
• W2920242575 hasConceptScore W2920242575C199343813 @default.
• W2920242575 hasConceptScore W2920242575C204787440 @default.
• W2920242575 hasConceptScore W2920242575C2778125672 @default.
• W2920242575 hasConceptScore W2920242575C2780385302 @default.
• W2920242575 hasConceptScore W2920242575C2781186661 @default.
• W2920242575 hasConceptScore W2920242575C50382708 @default.
• W2920242575 hasConceptScore W2920242575C66339696 @default.
• W2920242575 hasConceptScore W2920242575C71924100 @default.
• W2920242575 hasConceptScore W2920242575C72563966 @default.
• W2920242575 hasIssue "6" @default.
• W2920242575 hasLocation W29202425751 @default.
• W2920242575 hasLocation W29202425752 @default.
• W2920242575 hasOpenAccess W2920242575 @default.
• W2920242575 hasPrimaryLocation W29202425751 @default.
• W2920242575 hasRelatedWork W1973256748 @default.
• W2920242575 hasRelatedWork W1997539222 @default.
• W2920242575 hasRelatedWork W2010113271 @default.
• W2920242575 hasRelatedWork W2050604659 @default.
• W2920242575 hasRelatedWork W2079706256 @default.
• W2920242575 hasRelatedWork W2325735899 @default.
• W2920242575 hasRelatedWork W2999623050 @default.
• W2920242575 hasRelatedWork W3158868775 @default.
• W2920242575 hasRelatedWork W4214555434 @default.
• W2920242575 hasRelatedWork W3120864327 @default.
• W2920242575 hasVolume "77" @default.
• W2920242575 isParatext "false" @default.
• W2920242575 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W2920242575 magId "2920242575" @default.
• W2920242575 workType "article" @default.