FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2920595186> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2920595186 abstract "Mortality from hemodynamically unstable pelvic fractures remains high. Guidelines offer varying care approaches including the use of pelvic packing (PP), which was recently adopted for potential control of bleeding for this condition. However, the implementation of PP is uncertain as the debate on the optimal resuscitation strategy, angioembolization or PP continues. The study was designed to assess current practices among level 1 trauma centers in the US in regard to PP treatment for hemodynamically unstable pelvic fractures. A cross-sectional survey was created to assess when to apply PP, application approach, and the respondent’s anecdotal perception on safety and effectiveness. Trauma Medical Directors at 158 US level 1 trauma centers were sent biweekly email invitations for 3 months. Participants were allowed to skip questions for any reason. The study hypothesis was that PP practices vary by US census bureau region, annual trauma admissions, and length of time in years since each trauma center received their respective level 1 trauma center designation. Twenty-five percent (40/158) of trauma medical directors participated and 75% (118/158) of the trauma medical directors did not participate. Of those who took the survey, 36/40 (90%) completed the survey and 4/40 (10%) partially completed the survey. Only 36 trauma medical directors responded on their perception of safety and effectiveness; 72% (26/36) of participants perceived PP as safe, whereas only a third (12/36) of participants perceived PP as effective. There were 25 trauma medical directors who provided the sequence of treatment modalities utilized at their level 1 trauma center, 76% (19/25) of participants reported that PP is utilized as the third or fourth priority. None of the participating level 1 trauma centers reported a preference towards utilization of PP as the first priority treatment. Half of the participants reported a preference towards applying PP only as a last resort to control hemorrhage. Northeastern and Western level 1 trauma centers were significantly more likely than Midwestern and Southern level 1 trauma centers to have reported application of PP to all hemodynamically unstable patients (p = 0.05). Midwestern, Southern, and Western level 1 trauma centers were significantly more likely to have perceived PP as safe than Northeastern level 1 trauma centers (p = 0.04). All low-volume and 38% high-volume level 1 trauma centers perceived PP to increase infection risks, (p = 0.03). We observed no association between the length of time each trauma center was designated a level 1 trauma center, and all participant responses. Controversy and varying anecdotal perception regarding safety and effectiveness of PP prevails among trauma medical directors at level 1 trauma centers in the US." @default.
• W2920595186 created "2019-03-11" @default.
• W2920595186 creator A5011937647 @default.
• W2920595186 creator A5013202409 @default.
• W2920595186 creator A5016454067 @default.
• W2920595186 creator A5019960462 @default.
• W2920595186 creator A5031497734 @default.
• W2920595186 creator A5050297384 @default.
• W2920595186 creator A5070483335 @default.
• W2920595186 creator A5085457412 @default.
• W2920595186 creator A5087350576 @default.
• W2920595186 creator A5087983276 @default.
• W2920595186 date "2019-01-16" @default.
• W2920595186 modified "2023-10-18" @default.
• W2920595186 title "Variability in pelvic packing practices for hemodynamically unstable pelvic fractures at US level 1 trauma centers" @default.
• W2920595186 cites W168092492 @default.
• W2920595186 cites W1907480408 @default.
• W2920595186 cites W2009613353 @default.
• W2920595186 cites W2029551399 @default.
• W2920595186 cites W2032810297 @default.
• W2920595186 cites W2037250768 @default.
• W2920595186 cites W2055112190 @default.
• W2920595186 cites W2082198788 @default.
• W2920595186 cites W2084627454 @default.
• W2920595186 cites W2098930059 @default.
• W2920595186 cites W2115376676 @default.
• W2920595186 cites W2163019082 @default.
• W2920595186 cites W2317231632 @default.
• W2920595186 cites W2472334327 @default.
• W2920595186 cites W2550505970 @default.
• W2920595186 cites W2571018983 @default.
• W2920595186 cites W2575409350 @default.
• W2920595186 cites W2761696697 @default.
• W2920595186 cites W2783026595 @default.
• W2920595186 cites W2791431200 @default.
• W2920595186 doi "https://doi.org/10.1186/s13037-019-0183-7" @default.
• W2920595186 hasPubMedCentralId "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/6334446" @default.
• W2920595186 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/30675184" @default.
• W2920595186 hasPublicationYear "2019" @default.
• W2920595186 type Work @default.
• W2920595186 sameAs 2920595186 @default.
• W2920595186 citedByCount "15" @default.
• W2920595186 countsByYear W29205951862019 @default.
• W2920595186 countsByYear W29205951862020 @default.
• W2920595186 countsByYear W29205951862021 @default.
• W2920595186 countsByYear W29205951862022 @default.
• W2920595186 countsByYear W29205951862023 @default.
• W2920595186 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2920595186 hasAuthorship W2920595186A5011937647 @default.
• W2920595186 hasAuthorship W2920595186A5013202409 @default.
• W2920595186 hasAuthorship W2920595186A5016454067 @default.
• W2920595186 hasAuthorship W2920595186A5019960462 @default.
• W2920595186 hasAuthorship W2920595186A5031497734 @default.
• W2920595186 hasAuthorship W2920595186A5050297384 @default.
• W2920595186 hasAuthorship W2920595186A5070483335 @default.
• W2920595186 hasAuthorship W2920595186A5085457412 @default.
• W2920595186 hasAuthorship W2920595186A5087350576 @default.
• W2920595186 hasAuthorship W2920595186A5087983276 @default.
• W2920595186 hasBestOaLocation W29205951861 @default.
• W2920595186 hasConcept C141071460 @default.
• W2920595186 hasConcept C167135981 @default.
• W2920595186 hasConcept C17744445 @default.
• W2920595186 hasConcept C190385971 @default.
• W2920595186 hasConcept C194828623 @default.
• W2920595186 hasConcept C199539241 @default.
• W2920595186 hasConcept C2776640315 @default.
• W2920595186 hasConcept C2777545690 @default.
• W2920595186 hasConcept C2778357063 @default.
• W2920595186 hasConcept C2780110798 @default.
• W2920595186 hasConcept C2991660318 @default.
• W2920595186 hasConcept C3017944768 @default.
• W2920595186 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W2920595186 hasConcept C85004164 @default.
• W2920595186 hasConceptScore W2920595186C141071460 @default.
• W2920595186 hasConceptScore W2920595186C167135981 @default.
• W2920595186 hasConceptScore W2920595186C17744445 @default.
• W2920595186 hasConceptScore W2920595186C190385971 @default.
• W2920595186 hasConceptScore W2920595186C194828623 @default.
• W2920595186 hasConceptScore W2920595186C199539241 @default.
• W2920595186 hasConceptScore W2920595186C2776640315 @default.
• W2920595186 hasConceptScore W2920595186C2777545690 @default.
• W2920595186 hasConceptScore W2920595186C2778357063 @default.
• W2920595186 hasConceptScore W2920595186C2780110798 @default.
• W2920595186 hasConceptScore W2920595186C2991660318 @default.
• W2920595186 hasConceptScore W2920595186C3017944768 @default.
• W2920595186 hasConceptScore W2920595186C71924100 @default.
• W2920595186 hasConceptScore W2920595186C85004164 @default.
• W2920595186 hasIssue "1" @default.
• W2920595186 hasLocation W29205951861 @default.
• W2920595186 hasLocation W29205951862 @default.
• W2920595186 hasLocation W29205951863 @default.
• W2920595186 hasLocation W29205951864 @default.
• W2920595186 hasLocation W29205951865 @default.
• W2920595186 hasOpenAccess W2920595186 @default.
• W2920595186 hasPrimaryLocation W29205951861 @default.
• W2920595186 hasRelatedWork W2032810297 @default.
• W2920595186 hasRelatedWork W2091250749 @default.
• W2920595186 hasRelatedWork W2105210204 @default.
• W2920595186 hasRelatedWork W2802510129 @default.
• W2920595186 hasRelatedWork W3041634858 @default.

• next