FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2920818024> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2920818024 endingPage "S1534" @default.
• W2920818024 startingPage "S1533" @default.
• W2920818024 abstract "Introduction: Split dose bowel preparation has been shown to be superior to same day or previous day preparation and has been associated with higher adenoma detection rates and improved patient tolerance. The aim of the study was to evaluate bowel prep quality and factors impacting it in patients undergoing onsite split dosing. Methods: Data was retrospectively collected from an endoscopy database of a single large tertiary referral center of adult patients who underwent colonoscopy from January 2005 to November 2015. Patient demographics (age, race, gender, BMI, use of medications), data about presence of comorbidities and colonoscope type (standard definition, high-definition) were collected. Bowel preparation was defined as adequate if it was scored as good or excellent and inadequate if it was poor or fair. Redo colonoscopy was defined as a repeat colonoscopy within 6-12 months from preceding colonoscopy due to inadequate mucosal visualization. For univariate analysis, continuous variables were compared using Student's T-test and categorical variables were compared using chi-square or Fisher's exact test. Multivariate analysis was done using logistic regression model. Results: A total of 2138 patients who underwent 2893 colonoscopies were included in the study. The mean age of the patients was 66.3 years and 95.6% of them were males. Bowel preparation was inadequate in 214 (7.4%) patients. The demographics of the patients in both groups (adequate vs. inadequate prep) are listed in Table 1. Patients with an inadequate bowel preparation had significant lower adenoma detection rates (49.5% vs 63.4%, p<0.001); total number of adenomas removed (1.5 ± 2.7 vs. 1.9 ± 2.4; p<0.001) and cecal intubation rates (93.5% vs. 98.1%; p< 0.001). On multivariate analysis after adjusting for age, gender, and race, the presence of cirrhosis is associated with a higher risk of inadequate bowel preparation (OR 2.75, 95% CI 1.1-6.87, p=0.031). The odds of having a redo colonoscopy with inadequate prep was nearly twice as that with adequate preparation (OR 1.95, OR 1.15-3.31, p=0.014). Conclusion: Use of an onsite split dose bowel prep is associated with only 7% overall inadequate bowel preps, with 93% of the preps being either good or excellent. Inadequate bowel preps are associated with lower ADRs, adenomas removed and cecal intubation rates and higher colonoscopy re do rates. Cirrhosis appears to be a risk factor for inadequate bowel prep.2764_A Figure 1. Demographic variables, redo rates and quality indicators2764_B Figure 2. Multivariate logistic regression for predictors of inadequate bowel preparation" @default.
• W2920818024 created "2019-03-22" @default.
• W2920818024 creator A5001555201 @default.
• W2920818024 creator A5003136762 @default.
• W2920818024 creator A5023823647 @default.
• W2920818024 creator A5025960935 @default.
• W2920818024 creator A5035478191 @default.
• W2920818024 creator A5047758980 @default.
• W2920818024 creator A5062196649 @default.
• W2920818024 creator A5063286198 @default.
• W2920818024 creator A5063831985 @default.
• W2920818024 creator A5064809479 @default.
• W2920818024 creator A5067231090 @default.
• W2920818024 creator A5068248035 @default.
• W2920818024 creator A5072444245 @default.
• W2920818024 creator A5073266170 @default.
• W2920818024 creator A5078615861 @default.
• W2920818024 creator A5081249686 @default.
• W2920818024 creator A5081542507 @default.
• W2920818024 creator A5082362927 @default.
• W2920818024 creator A5084841926 @default.
• W2920818024 creator A5085040119 @default.
• W2920818024 date "2018-10-01" @default.
• W2920818024 modified "2023-09-27" @default.
• W2920818024 title "Analysis of Adequacy of Bowel Preparation in Patients Receiving Onsite Dosing" @default.
• W2920818024 doi "https://doi.org/10.14309/00000434-201810001-02763" @default.
• W2920818024 hasPublicationYear "2018" @default.
• W2920818024 type Work @default.
• W2920818024 sameAs 2920818024 @default.
• W2920818024 citedByCount "0" @default.
• W2920818024 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2920818024 hasAuthorship W2920818024A5001555201 @default.
• W2920818024 hasAuthorship W2920818024A5003136762 @default.
• W2920818024 hasAuthorship W2920818024A5023823647 @default.
• W2920818024 hasAuthorship W2920818024A5025960935 @default.
• W2920818024 hasAuthorship W2920818024A5035478191 @default.
• W2920818024 hasAuthorship W2920818024A5047758980 @default.
• W2920818024 hasAuthorship W2920818024A5062196649 @default.
• W2920818024 hasAuthorship W2920818024A5063286198 @default.
• W2920818024 hasAuthorship W2920818024A5063831985 @default.
• W2920818024 hasAuthorship W2920818024A5064809479 @default.
• W2920818024 hasAuthorship W2920818024A5067231090 @default.
• W2920818024 hasAuthorship W2920818024A5068248035 @default.
• W2920818024 hasAuthorship W2920818024A5072444245 @default.
• W2920818024 hasAuthorship W2920818024A5073266170 @default.
• W2920818024 hasAuthorship W2920818024A5078615861 @default.
• W2920818024 hasAuthorship W2920818024A5081249686 @default.
• W2920818024 hasAuthorship W2920818024A5081542507 @default.
• W2920818024 hasAuthorship W2920818024A5082362927 @default.
• W2920818024 hasAuthorship W2920818024A5084841926 @default.
• W2920818024 hasAuthorship W2920818024A5085040119 @default.
• W2920818024 hasConcept C121608353 @default.
• W2920818024 hasConcept C126322002 @default.
• W2920818024 hasConcept C141071460 @default.
• W2920818024 hasConcept C144024400 @default.
• W2920818024 hasConcept C144301174 @default.
• W2920818024 hasConcept C149923435 @default.
• W2920818024 hasConcept C151956035 @default.
• W2920818024 hasConcept C191093355 @default.
• W2920818024 hasConcept C2776135927 @default.
• W2920818024 hasConcept C2777288759 @default.
• W2920818024 hasConcept C2778435480 @default.
• W2920818024 hasConcept C2778494295 @default.
• W2920818024 hasConcept C2780084366 @default.
• W2920818024 hasConcept C3019222653 @default.
• W2920818024 hasConcept C34626388 @default.
• W2920818024 hasConcept C38180746 @default.
• W2920818024 hasConcept C512399662 @default.
• W2920818024 hasConcept C526805850 @default.
• W2920818024 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W2920818024 hasConceptScore W2920818024C121608353 @default.
• W2920818024 hasConceptScore W2920818024C126322002 @default.
• W2920818024 hasConceptScore W2920818024C141071460 @default.
• W2920818024 hasConceptScore W2920818024C144024400 @default.
• W2920818024 hasConceptScore W2920818024C144301174 @default.
• W2920818024 hasConceptScore W2920818024C149923435 @default.
• W2920818024 hasConceptScore W2920818024C151956035 @default.
• W2920818024 hasConceptScore W2920818024C191093355 @default.
• W2920818024 hasConceptScore W2920818024C2776135927 @default.
• W2920818024 hasConceptScore W2920818024C2777288759 @default.
• W2920818024 hasConceptScore W2920818024C2778435480 @default.
• W2920818024 hasConceptScore W2920818024C2778494295 @default.
• W2920818024 hasConceptScore W2920818024C2780084366 @default.
• W2920818024 hasConceptScore W2920818024C3019222653 @default.
• W2920818024 hasConceptScore W2920818024C34626388 @default.
• W2920818024 hasConceptScore W2920818024C38180746 @default.
• W2920818024 hasConceptScore W2920818024C512399662 @default.
• W2920818024 hasConceptScore W2920818024C526805850 @default.
• W2920818024 hasConceptScore W2920818024C71924100 @default.
• W2920818024 hasIssue "Supplement" @default.
• W2920818024 hasLocation W29208180241 @default.
• W2920818024 hasOpenAccess W2920818024 @default.
• W2920818024 hasPrimaryLocation W29208180241 @default.
• W2920818024 hasRelatedWork W2119822303 @default.
• W2920818024 hasRelatedWork W2165341508 @default.
• W2920818024 hasRelatedWork W2304574241 @default.
• W2920818024 hasRelatedWork W256909155 @default.
• W2920818024 hasRelatedWork W2799307716 @default.

• next