FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2920984929> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2920984929 endingPage "83" @default.
• W2920984929 startingPage "79" @default.
• W2920984929 abstract "ABSTRACT BACKGROUND: Digital rectal examination (DRE) is part of the physical examination, is also essential for the colorectal surgeon evaluation. A good DRE offers precious information related to the patient’s complaints, which will help in decision making. It is simple, quick and minimally invasive. In many centers around the world, the DRE is still the only method to evaluate the anal sphincter prior to patient’s management. On the other hand, anorectal manometry (ARM) is the main method for objective functional evaluation of anal sphincter pressures. The discrepancy of DRE depending on the examiner to determine sphincter tonus in comparison to ARM motivated this study. OBJECTIVE: To compare the DRE performed by proficient and non-experienced examiners to sphincter pressure parameters obtained at ARM, depending on examiners expertise. METHODS: Thirty-six consecutive patients with complaints of fecal incontinence or chronic constipation, from the anorectal physiology clinic of the University of São Paulo School of Medicine, were prospectively included. Each patient underwent ARM and DRE performed by two senior colorectal surgeons and one junior colorectal surgeon prior to the ARM. Patient’s history was blinded for the examiner’s knowledge, also the impressions of each examiner were blinded from the others. For the DRE rest and squeeze pressures were classified by an objective scale (DRE scoring system) that was compared to the parameters of the ARM for the analysis. The results obtained at the ARM were compared to the DRE performed by the seniors and the junior colorectal surgeons. STATISTICAL ANALYSIS: Descriptive analysis was performed for all parameters. For the rest and squeeze pressures the Gamma index was used for the comparison between the DRE and ARM, which varied from 0 to 1. The closer to 1 the better was the agreement. RESULTS: The mean age was 48 years old and 55.5% of patients were female. The agreement of rest anal pressures between the ARM and the DRE performed by the senior proficient examiners was 0.7 (CI 95%; 0.32-1.0), while for the junior non-experienced examiner was 0.52 (CI 95%; 0.09-0.96). The agreement of squeeze pressures was 0.96 (CI 95%; 0.87-1.0) for the seniors and 0.52 (CI 95%; 0.16-0.89) for the junior examiner. CONCLUSION: More experienced colorectal surgeons used to DRE had a more significant agreement with the ARM, thereafter would have more appropriate therapeutic management to patients with sphincter functional problems. ARM, therefore, persists as an important exam to objectively evaluate the sphincter complex, justifying its utility in the clinical practice." @default.
• W2920984929 created "2019-03-22" @default.
• W2920984929 creator A5005601691 @default.
• W2920984929 creator A5011715834 @default.
• W2920984929 creator A5026025173 @default.
• W2920984929 creator A5031320229 @default.
• W2920984929 creator A5061299159 @default.
• W2920984929 creator A5091341443 @default.
• W2920984929 date "2019-03-01" @default.
• W2920984929 modified "2023-10-17" @default.
• W2920984929 title "IS THE PHYSICIAN EXPERTISE IN DIGITAL RECTAL EXAMINATION OF VALUE IN DETECTING ANAL TONE IN COMPARISON TO ANORECTAL MANOMETRY?" @default.
• W2920984929 cites W1828167366 @default.
• W2920984929 cites W1980876467 @default.
• W2920984929 cites W2015050122 @default.
• W2920984929 cites W2024459255 @default.
• W2920984929 cites W2034996653 @default.
• W2920984929 cites W2036459813 @default.
• W2920984929 cites W2060408336 @default.
• W2920984929 cites W2077992674 @default.
• W2920984929 cites W2082914003 @default.
• W2920984929 cites W2087831638 @default.
• W2920984929 cites W2090268946 @default.
• W2920984929 cites W2117300470 @default.
• W2920984929 cites W2154123287 @default.
• W2920984929 cites W2161885342 @default.
• W2920984929 cites W2163817616 @default.
• W2920984929 cites W2321008488 @default.
• W2920984929 cites W2526025225 @default.
• W2920984929 cites W2539960155 @default.
• W2920984929 cites W2791172173 @default.
• W2920984929 cites W3020862229 @default.
• W2920984929 doi "https://doi.org/10.1590/s0004-2803.201900000-04" @default.
• W2920984929 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/31141075" @default.
• W2920984929 hasPublicationYear "2019" @default.
• W2920984929 type Work @default.
• W2920984929 sameAs 2920984929 @default.
• W2920984929 citedByCount "5" @default.
• W2920984929 countsByYear W29209849292019 @default.
• W2920984929 countsByYear W29209849292020 @default.
• W2920984929 countsByYear W29209849292022 @default.
• W2920984929 countsByYear W29209849292023 @default.
• W2920984929 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2920984929 hasAuthorship W2920984929A5005601691 @default.
• W2920984929 hasAuthorship W2920984929A5011715834 @default.
• W2920984929 hasAuthorship W2920984929A5026025173 @default.
• W2920984929 hasAuthorship W2920984929A5031320229 @default.
• W2920984929 hasAuthorship W2920984929A5061299159 @default.
• W2920984929 hasAuthorship W2920984929A5091341443 @default.
• W2920984929 hasBestOaLocation W29209849291 @default.
• W2920984929 hasConcept C121608353 @default.
• W2920984929 hasConcept C126322002 @default.
• W2920984929 hasConcept C141071460 @default.
• W2920984929 hasConcept C1862650 @default.
• W2920984929 hasConcept C2776813522 @default.
• W2920984929 hasConcept C2780035688 @default.
• W2920984929 hasConcept C2780101318 @default.
• W2920984929 hasConcept C2780120127 @default.
• W2920984929 hasConcept C2780192828 @default.
• W2920984929 hasConcept C2780691517 @default.
• W2920984929 hasConcept C2780877482 @default.
• W2920984929 hasConcept C2781074409 @default.
• W2920984929 hasConcept C2781112942 @default.
• W2920984929 hasConcept C2993285706 @default.
• W2920984929 hasConcept C523026621 @default.
• W2920984929 hasConcept C527108885 @default.
• W2920984929 hasConcept C61434518 @default.
• W2920984929 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W2920984929 hasConceptScore W2920984929C121608353 @default.
• W2920984929 hasConceptScore W2920984929C126322002 @default.
• W2920984929 hasConceptScore W2920984929C141071460 @default.
• W2920984929 hasConceptScore W2920984929C1862650 @default.
• W2920984929 hasConceptScore W2920984929C2776813522 @default.
• W2920984929 hasConceptScore W2920984929C2780035688 @default.
• W2920984929 hasConceptScore W2920984929C2780101318 @default.
• W2920984929 hasConceptScore W2920984929C2780120127 @default.
• W2920984929 hasConceptScore W2920984929C2780192828 @default.
• W2920984929 hasConceptScore W2920984929C2780691517 @default.
• W2920984929 hasConceptScore W2920984929C2780877482 @default.
• W2920984929 hasConceptScore W2920984929C2781074409 @default.
• W2920984929 hasConceptScore W2920984929C2781112942 @default.
• W2920984929 hasConceptScore W2920984929C2993285706 @default.
• W2920984929 hasConceptScore W2920984929C523026621 @default.
• W2920984929 hasConceptScore W2920984929C527108885 @default.
• W2920984929 hasConceptScore W2920984929C61434518 @default.
• W2920984929 hasConceptScore W2920984929C71924100 @default.
• W2920984929 hasIssue "1" @default.
• W2920984929 hasLocation W29209849291 @default.
• W2920984929 hasLocation W29209849292 @default.
• W2920984929 hasLocation W29209849293 @default.
• W2920984929 hasLocation W29209849294 @default.
• W2920984929 hasOpenAccess W2920984929 @default.
• W2920984929 hasPrimaryLocation W29209849291 @default.
• W2920984929 hasRelatedWork W2014494428 @default.
• W2920984929 hasRelatedWork W2045289164 @default.
• W2920984929 hasRelatedWork W2046425432 @default.
• W2920984929 hasRelatedWork W2048611478 @default.
• W2920984929 hasRelatedWork W2051946579 @default.
• W2920984929 hasRelatedWork W2314187822 @default.

• next