FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2921291633> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2921291633 endingPage "134" @default.
• W2921291633 startingPage "129" @default.
• W2921291633 abstract "Study Objective Cesarean scar defect (CSD) is often associated with postmenstrual bleeding, infertility, and pain. Hysteroscopic CSD repair was described in the past, mainly as excision of the proximal edge of the defect to allow continuous blood flow during menstruation. In this study we aimed to evaluate the efficacy of extensive hysteroscopic cesarean scar niche excision in symptomatic patients. Design A retrospective cohort study. Patients Symptomatic patients treated with hysteroscopic CSD excision who were considered eligible for the procedure when myometrial thickness of 2 mm or more was observed on sonohysterography. Setting Tertiary referral center. Interventions Extensive CSD excision was performed using a cutting loop and pure cutting current. The proximal and distal edges of the defect were resected. This was followed by resection of tissue at the base of the niche, until underling muscular tissue was evident. Tissue sampled from the base of the CSD was collected for histologic examination. Patients were followed for a minimum of 1 year after hysteroscopic CSD excision. Clinical information obtained included detailed obstetric history and preoperative and postoperative menstruation pattern. Measurements and Main Results Between 2011 and 2016, 95 patients underwent extensive hysteroscopic niche excision; 67 were included in the study, whereas the remaining were lost to follow-up. Patient mean age at the time of the procedure was 38 ± 5.5 years. Twenty-nine patients (43%) had a history of high-order repeat cesarean surgeries. Sixty-six patients (98.5%) presented with postmenstrual bleeding, 26 with secondary infertility (38.8%), and 2 with pelvic pain (2.9%). After hysteroscopic niche excision, 63.4% of patients reported significant improvement or resolution of postmenstrual bleeding. A statistically significant reduction in number of bleeding days per cycle (15.5 ± 4.8 vs 9.8 ± 4.7, p < .001) was also noted. Histologic evidence for myometrial tissue within the obtained samples was associated with better outcomes. A histologic specimen from patients who experienced significant improvement or resolution of postmenstrual bleeding was more likely to reveal myometrial tissue (p = .04). Of the 26 patients who suffered from infertility, 19 attempted to conceive spontaneously after CSD excision. Of those, 10 patients (52.6%) conceived and 9 delivered at least once (47.36%). Conclusion Extensive hysteroscopic surgical excision of cesarean scar niche should be considered in symptomatic patients suffering from irregular menstrual bleeding. The quality of the excision at the apex of the niche could be associated with a higher success rate. The role of niche excision to overcome secondary infertility should be further evaluated." @default.
• W2921291633 created "2019-03-22" @default.
• W2921291633 creator A5024772939 @default.
• W2921291633 creator A5029295644 @default.
• W2921291633 creator A5033250958 @default.
• W2921291633 creator A5053046603 @default.
• W2921291633 creator A5054448089 @default.
• W2921291633 creator A5064026283 @default.
• W2921291633 creator A5089579892 @default.
• W2921291633 date "2020-01-01" @default.
• W2921291633 modified "2023-10-13" @default.
• W2921291633 title "Clinical Success Rate of Extensive Hysteroscopic Cesarean Scar Defect Excision and Correlation to Histologic Findings" @default.
• W2921291633 cites W1889078410 @default.
• W2921291633 cites W1998828373 @default.
• W2921291633 cites W2004678477 @default.
• W2921291633 cites W2005504005 @default.
• W2921291633 cites W2018267420 @default.
• W2921291633 cites W2022568172 @default.
• W2921291633 cites W2024574119 @default.
• W2921291633 cites W2043474422 @default.
• W2921291633 cites W2067167723 @default.
• W2921291633 cites W2074737204 @default.
• W2921291633 cites W2087168157 @default.
• W2921291633 cites W2088438003 @default.
• W2921291633 cites W2103895709 @default.
• W2921291633 cites W2107286738 @default.
• W2921291633 cites W2173448633 @default.
• W2921291633 cites W2468467414 @default.
• W2921291633 cites W2468854782 @default.
• W2921291633 cites W2616824070 @default.
• W2921291633 cites W2736640601 @default.
• W2921291633 cites W2751481798 @default.
• W2921291633 cites W2763095704 @default.
• W2921291633 cites W2784667873 @default.
• W2921291633 cites W2791590190 @default.
• W2921291633 doi "https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmig.2019.03.001" @default.
• W2921291633 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/30858053" @default.
• W2921291633 hasPublicationYear "2020" @default.
• W2921291633 type Work @default.
• W2921291633 sameAs 2921291633 @default.
• W2921291633 citedByCount "23" @default.
• W2921291633 countsByYear W29212916332020 @default.
• W2921291633 countsByYear W29212916332021 @default.
• W2921291633 countsByYear W29212916332022 @default.
• W2921291633 countsByYear W29212916332023 @default.
• W2921291633 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2921291633 hasAuthorship W2921291633A5024772939 @default.
• W2921291633 hasAuthorship W2921291633A5029295644 @default.
• W2921291633 hasAuthorship W2921291633A5033250958 @default.
• W2921291633 hasAuthorship W2921291633A5053046603 @default.
• W2921291633 hasAuthorship W2921291633A5054448089 @default.
• W2921291633 hasAuthorship W2921291633A5064026283 @default.
• W2921291633 hasAuthorship W2921291633A5089579892 @default.
• W2921291633 hasBestOaLocation W29212916331 @default.
• W2921291633 hasConcept C141071460 @default.
• W2921291633 hasConcept C167135981 @default.
• W2921291633 hasConcept C2775963564 @default.
• W2921291633 hasConcept C2777688143 @default.
• W2921291633 hasConcept C2779234561 @default.
• W2921291633 hasConcept C2780136519 @default.
• W2921291633 hasConcept C54355233 @default.
• W2921291633 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W2921291633 hasConcept C86803240 @default.
• W2921291633 hasConceptScore W2921291633C141071460 @default.
• W2921291633 hasConceptScore W2921291633C167135981 @default.
• W2921291633 hasConceptScore W2921291633C2775963564 @default.
• W2921291633 hasConceptScore W2921291633C2777688143 @default.
• W2921291633 hasConceptScore W2921291633C2779234561 @default.
• W2921291633 hasConceptScore W2921291633C2780136519 @default.
• W2921291633 hasConceptScore W2921291633C54355233 @default.
• W2921291633 hasConceptScore W2921291633C71924100 @default.
• W2921291633 hasConceptScore W2921291633C86803240 @default.
• W2921291633 hasIssue "1" @default.
• W2921291633 hasLocation W29212916331 @default.
• W2921291633 hasLocation W29212916332 @default.
• W2921291633 hasOpenAccess W2921291633 @default.
• W2921291633 hasPrimaryLocation W29212916331 @default.
• W2921291633 hasRelatedWork W1969159524 @default.
• W2921291633 hasRelatedWork W2129286986 @default.
• W2921291633 hasRelatedWork W2139207524 @default.
• W2921291633 hasRelatedWork W2358869013 @default.
• W2921291633 hasRelatedWork W2363607792 @default.
• W2921291633 hasRelatedWork W2371661862 @default.
• W2921291633 hasRelatedWork W2418077248 @default.
• W2921291633 hasRelatedWork W3032089813 @default.
• W2921291633 hasRelatedWork W3161991543 @default.
• W2921291633 hasRelatedWork W4220715452 @default.
• W2921291633 hasVolume "27" @default.
• W2921291633 isParatext "false" @default.
• W2921291633 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W2921291633 magId "2921291633" @default.
• W2921291633 workType "article" @default.