FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2921883172> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2921883172 endingPage "62" @default.
• W2921883172 startingPage "43" @default.
• W2921883172 abstract "Purpose The purpose of this paper is to extend the knowledge claim of management accounting research using qualitative research methods, in particular, the interpretive case study, and its evaluation using “convincingness” criteria demonstrating the textual authenticity, plausibility and criticality of case study findings. Design/methodology/approach Qualitative research in the management accounting field considers both context and function (Burchell et al., 1980). This study sets out the rationale for adopting qualitative methodologies such as interpretive case studies in which rich, contextual and detailed data were collected and analyzed (Miles and Huberman, 1994; Mason, 2002). Methodological issues related to research design, analysis and evaluation are discussed by drawing on frameworks of social science research design. The paper sets out the procedures of an interpretive case study essential to ensuring the procedural validity of research which can be evaluated more accurately using the criteria of “convincingness” rather than positivist measures of the reliability, validity of data and the generalization of results. Textual authenticity, plausibility and critical interpretation, and how these hallmarks of “convincingness” can reflect the procedural validity of accounting research are described. Findings Qualitative research strategies such as the interpretive case study, which consider the complex settings of accounting change and practice, are found to offer deep understandings and convincing explanations of accounting change. Affirming that accounting is firmly established as a social science, the paper finds that the authenticity, plausibility and criticality of research in this field. Research limitations/implications The relevance of qualitative research to contemporary accounting research is considered as an effective method to explicate theory and inform practice, which suggests that new measures to evaluate related research are required to develop the potential of selected qualitative research methodologies in accounting domains. Originality/value Qualitative research in management accounting focuses on the interpretation of meanings found in people and organizations that are subject to the influence of contextual variables. Human attributes underpin accounting conventions and change resulting from continuous technological and regulatory advances. This paper’s comprehensive account of interpretive case study research emphasizes the significance of evaluative criteria that relate, beyond reliability, to the richness of the text. This, thus, encourages and supports new and emerging researchers to seek qualitatively coherent and critical interpretations in management accounting research." @default.
• W2921883172 created "2019-03-22" @default.
• W2921883172 creator A5024449710 @default.
• W2921883172 creator A5079575604 @default.
• W2921883172 date "2019-02-04" @default.
• W2921883172 modified "2023-09-27" @default.
• W2921883172 title "Evaluating qualitative research in management accounting using the criteria of “convincingness”" @default.
• W2921883172 cites W1528653333 @default.
• W2921883172 cites W1542056601 @default.
• W2921883172 cites W1575867849 @default.
• W2921883172 cites W1595864857 @default.
• W2921883172 cites W1654892695 @default.
• W2921883172 cites W1964295097 @default.
• W2921883172 cites W1967100576 @default.
• W2921883172 cites W1967353383 @default.
• W2921883172 cites W1968097381 @default.
• W2921883172 cites W1971425366 @default.
• W2921883172 cites W1973172249 @default.
• W2921883172 cites W1981369038 @default.
• W2921883172 cites W1981556361 @default.
• W2921883172 cites W1984804982 @default.
• W2921883172 cites W1986310676 @default.
• W2921883172 cites W1987614881 @default.
• W2921883172 cites W1993425303 @default.
• W2921883172 cites W1996089301 @default.
• W2921883172 cites W1998274394 @default.
• W2921883172 cites W2000165925 @default.
• W2921883172 cites W2001121837 @default.
• W2921883172 cites W2003019240 @default.
• W2921883172 cites W2008377063 @default.
• W2921883172 cites W2008626345 @default.
• W2921883172 cites W2013223715 @default.
• W2921883172 cites W2017445995 @default.
• W2921883172 cites W2018772535 @default.
• W2921883172 cites W2019979647 @default.
• W2921883172 cites W2025476558 @default.
• W2921883172 cites W2030568050 @default.
• W2921883172 cites W2030846517 @default.
• W2921883172 cites W2033469757 @default.
• W2921883172 cites W2041471454 @default.
• W2921883172 cites W2042540220 @default.
• W2921883172 cites W2043599913 @default.
• W2921883172 cites W2044224311 @default.
• W2921883172 cites W2046565558 @default.
• W2921883172 cites W2060580886 @default.
• W2921883172 cites W2063736169 @default.
• W2921883172 cites W2066133740 @default.
• W2921883172 cites W2066421325 @default.
• W2921883172 cites W2071951470 @default.
• W2921883172 cites W2077545251 @default.
• W2921883172 cites W2087024874 @default.
• W2921883172 cites W2117253505 @default.
• W2921883172 cites W2124313400 @default.
• W2921883172 cites W2126070475 @default.
• W2921883172 cites W2126321946 @default.
• W2921883172 cites W2126720018 @default.
• W2921883172 cites W2138778162 @default.
• W2921883172 cites W2140000640 @default.
• W2921883172 cites W2140335372 @default.
• W2921883172 cites W2141951329 @default.
• W2921883172 cites W2148277253 @default.
• W2921883172 cites W2150674548 @default.
• W2921883172 cites W2163886747 @default.
• W2921883172 cites W2166176163 @default.
• W2921883172 cites W2205688077 @default.
• W2921883172 cites W2272777820 @default.
• W2921883172 cites W2320553613 @default.
• W2921883172 cites W2905658921 @default.
• W2921883172 cites W3124585060 @default.
• W2921883172 cites W4244980215 @default.
• W2921883172 cites W4249826701 @default.
• W2921883172 cites W4255291864 @default.
• W2921883172 doi "https://doi.org/10.1108/par-03-2016-0031" @default.
• W2921883172 hasPublicationYear "2019" @default.
• W2921883172 type Work @default.
• W2921883172 sameAs 2921883172 @default.
• W2921883172 citedByCount "11" @default.
• W2921883172 countsByYear W29218831722019 @default.
• W2921883172 countsByYear W29218831722020 @default.
• W2921883172 countsByYear W29218831722021 @default.
• W2921883172 countsByYear W29218831722022 @default.
• W2921883172 countsByYear W29218831722023 @default.
• W2921883172 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2921883172 hasAuthorship W2921883172A5024449710 @default.
• W2921883172 hasAuthorship W2921883172A5079575604 @default.
• W2921883172 hasConcept C111472728 @default.
• W2921883172 hasConcept C121955636 @default.
• W2921883172 hasConcept C127413603 @default.
• W2921883172 hasConcept C128706718 @default.
• W2921883172 hasConcept C138885662 @default.
• W2921883172 hasConcept C144024400 @default.
• W2921883172 hasConcept C144133560 @default.
• W2921883172 hasConcept C151730666 @default.
• W2921883172 hasConcept C15744967 @default.
• W2921883172 hasConcept C158154518 @default.
• W2921883172 hasConcept C17744445 @default.
• W2921883172 hasConcept C190248442 @default.
• W2921883172 hasConcept C199360897 @default.

• next