FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2922040900> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2922040900 endingPage "658" @default.
• W2922040900 startingPage "658" @default.
• W2922040900 abstract "Whole-breast ultrasonography has been advocated to supplement screening mammography to improve outcomes in women with dense breasts.To determine the performance of screening mammography plus screening ultrasonography compared with screening mammography alone in community practice.Observational cohort study. Two Breast Cancer Surveillance Consortium registries provided prospectively collected data on screening mammography with vs without same-day breast ultrasonography from January 1, 2000, to December 31, 2013. The dates of analysis were March 2014 to December 2018. A total of 6081 screening mammography plus same-day screening ultrasonography examinations in 3386 women were propensity score matched 1:5 to 30 062 screening mammograms without screening ultrasonography in 15 176 women from a sample of 113 293 mammograms. Exclusion criteria included a personal history of breast cancer and self-reported breast symptoms.Screening mammography with vs without screening ultrasonography.Cancer detection rate and rates of interval cancer, false-positive biopsy recommendation, short-interval follow-up, and positive predictive value of biopsy recommendation were estimated and compared using log binomial regression.Screening mammography with vs without ultrasonography examinations was performed more often in women with dense breasts (74.3% [n = 4317 of 5810] vs 35.9% [n = 39 928 of 111 306] in the overall sample), in women who were younger than 50 years (49.7% [n = 3022 of 6081] vs 31.7% [n = 16 897 of 112 462]), and in women with a family history of breast cancer (42.9% [n = 2595 of 6055] vs 15.0% [n = 16 897 of 112 462]). While 21.4% (n = 1154 of 5392) of screening ultrasonography examinations were performed in women with high or very high (≥2.50%) Breast Cancer Surveillance Consortium 5-year risk scores, 53.6% (n = 2889 of 5392) had low or average (<1.67%) risk. Comparing mammography plus ultrasonography with mammography alone, the cancer detection rate was similar at 5.4 vs 5.5 per 1000 screens (adjusted relative risk [RR], 1.14; 95% CI, 0.76-1.68), as were interval cancer rates at 1.5 vs 1.9 per 1000 screens (RR, 0.67; 95% CI, 0.33-1.37). The false-positive biopsy rates were significantly higher at 52.0 vs 22.2 per 1000 screens (RR, 2.23; 95% CI, 1.93-2.58), as was short-interval follow-up at 3.9% vs 1.1% (RR, 3.10; 95% CI, 2.60-3.70). The positive predictive value of biopsy recommendation was significantly lower at 9.5% vs 21.4% (RR, 0.50; 95% CI, 0.35-0.71).In a relatively young population of women at low, intermediate, and high breast cancer risk, these results suggest that the benefits of supplemental ultrasonography screening may not outweigh associated harms." @default.
• W2922040900 created "2019-03-22" @default.
• W2922040900 creator A5004918315 @default.
• W2922040900 creator A5008335692 @default.
• W2922040900 creator A5010554476 @default.
• W2922040900 creator A5020615352 @default.
• W2922040900 creator A5031915406 @default.
• W2922040900 creator A5050357899 @default.
• W2922040900 creator A5078748963 @default.
• W2922040900 creator A5085257013 @default.
• W2922040900 creator A5087244073 @default.
• W2922040900 date "2019-05-01" @default.
• W2922040900 modified "2023-10-13" @default.
• W2922040900 title "Performance of Screening Ultrasonography as an Adjunct to Screening Mammography in Women Across the Spectrum of Breast Cancer Risk" @default.
• W2922040900 cites W1517484939 @default.
• W2922040900 cites W1971315309 @default.
• W2922040900 cites W1982231208 @default.
• W2922040900 cites W2060895692 @default.
• W2922040900 cites W2075359794 @default.
• W2922040900 cites W2080749309 @default.
• W2922040900 cites W2102350095 @default.
• W2922040900 cites W2103659135 @default.
• W2922040900 cites W2111784232 @default.
• W2922040900 cites W2126049444 @default.
• W2922040900 cites W2135118182 @default.
• W2922040900 cites W2137040237 @default.
• W2922040900 cites W2149988868 @default.
• W2922040900 cites W2171317772 @default.
• W2922040900 cites W2273955834 @default.
• W2922040900 cites W2293501394 @default.
• W2922040900 cites W2432749794 @default.
• W2922040900 cites W2540163092 @default.
• W2922040900 cites W2551334006 @default.
• W2922040900 cites W2745771984 @default.
• W2922040900 cites W2783194010 @default.
• W2922040900 cites W2790281834 @default.
• W2922040900 cites W2790330951 @default.
• W2922040900 cites W2801665024 @default.
• W2922040900 doi "https://doi.org/10.1001/jamainternmed.2018.8372" @default.
• W2922040900 hasPubMedCentralId "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/6503561" @default.
• W2922040900 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/30882843" @default.
• W2922040900 hasPublicationYear "2019" @default.
• W2922040900 type Work @default.
• W2922040900 sameAs 2922040900 @default.
• W2922040900 citedByCount "61" @default.
• W2922040900 countsByYear W29220409002019 @default.
• W2922040900 countsByYear W29220409002020 @default.
• W2922040900 countsByYear W29220409002021 @default.
• W2922040900 countsByYear W29220409002022 @default.
• W2922040900 countsByYear W29220409002023 @default.
• W2922040900 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2922040900 hasAuthorship W2922040900A5004918315 @default.
• W2922040900 hasAuthorship W2922040900A5008335692 @default.
• W2922040900 hasAuthorship W2922040900A5010554476 @default.
• W2922040900 hasAuthorship W2922040900A5020615352 @default.
• W2922040900 hasAuthorship W2922040900A5031915406 @default.
• W2922040900 hasAuthorship W2922040900A5050357899 @default.
• W2922040900 hasAuthorship W2922040900A5078748963 @default.
• W2922040900 hasAuthorship W2922040900A5085257013 @default.
• W2922040900 hasAuthorship W2922040900A5087244073 @default.
• W2922040900 hasBestOaLocation W29220409001 @default.
• W2922040900 hasConcept C121608353 @default.
• W2922040900 hasConcept C126322002 @default.
• W2922040900 hasConcept C126838900 @default.
• W2922040900 hasConcept C131872663 @default.
• W2922040900 hasConcept C2777432617 @default.
• W2922040900 hasConcept C2778491387 @default.
• W2922040900 hasConcept C2780472235 @default.
• W2922040900 hasConcept C29456083 @default.
• W2922040900 hasConcept C44249647 @default.
• W2922040900 hasConcept C529618451 @default.
• W2922040900 hasConcept C530470458 @default.
• W2922040900 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W2922040900 hasConceptScore W2922040900C121608353 @default.
• W2922040900 hasConceptScore W2922040900C126322002 @default.
• W2922040900 hasConceptScore W2922040900C126838900 @default.
• W2922040900 hasConceptScore W2922040900C131872663 @default.
• W2922040900 hasConceptScore W2922040900C2777432617 @default.
• W2922040900 hasConceptScore W2922040900C2778491387 @default.
• W2922040900 hasConceptScore W2922040900C2780472235 @default.
• W2922040900 hasConceptScore W2922040900C29456083 @default.
• W2922040900 hasConceptScore W2922040900C44249647 @default.
• W2922040900 hasConceptScore W2922040900C529618451 @default.
• W2922040900 hasConceptScore W2922040900C530470458 @default.
• W2922040900 hasConceptScore W2922040900C71924100 @default.
• W2922040900 hasIssue "5" @default.
• W2922040900 hasLocation W29220409001 @default.
• W2922040900 hasLocation W29220409002 @default.
• W2922040900 hasLocation W29220409003 @default.
• W2922040900 hasLocation W29220409004 @default.
• W2922040900 hasOpenAccess W2922040900 @default.
• W2922040900 hasPrimaryLocation W29220409001 @default.
• W2922040900 hasRelatedWork W1920021032 @default.
• W2922040900 hasRelatedWork W2047549044 @default.
• W2922040900 hasRelatedWork W2066039078 @default.
• W2922040900 hasRelatedWork W2336487165 @default.
• W2922040900 hasRelatedWork W2889886897 @default.
• W2922040900 hasRelatedWork W2895974935 @default.

• next