Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2922519709> ?p ?o ?g. }
Showing items 1 to 68 of
68
with 100 items per page.
- W2922519709 endingPage "720" @default.
- W2922519709 startingPage "701" @default.
- W2922519709 abstract "How many scholarly fields have experienced the disappointing fate of comparative law and continued in the grip of a demonstrably indigent epistemology for decades on end? After the early postmodernity witnessed their protracted servitude to Les Grands systèmes's jejune classifications, facile correspondences, and meagre interpretive return — a predicament which, implausibly, endures in countries as diverse as Brazil, France, and Russia — law's comparatists began taking their epistemic orders from Hamburg and the Hamburgher diaspora. For fifty years or so, they have been gorged on a diet of Rechtsdogmatik , scientism, objectivity, neutrality, truth, and assorted shibboleths. As if these epistemic delusions were not problematic enough, the earlier, obsolete model was eventually revived although tweaked to focus on traditions instead of systems (or families). While critics were occasionally moved to chastise threadbare Hanseatic knowledge-claims — some expressing their concern in conspicuous venues, others harnessing prestigious institutional affiliations — comparative law's orthodoxy, somewhat extraordinarily, has hitherto been able to operate unencumbered by any epistemic challenge whose monographic exposition would have proved decidedly pre-eminent. It is the great merit of Gunter Frankenberg's Comparative Law As Critique , in crucial respects an account at once capital and extensive, that it interrupts, finally, the longstanding deployment of comparative law's mainstream imposture. Frankenberg's refutation is thus well worth restating, and the first part of this review wishes loyally to apply itself to this important representative task not least by affording the author much latitude to express himself in his own voice. Yet, Frankenberg's considerable critical integrity notwithstanding, this essay holds that his epistemic transgression remains too diffident. Specifically, five key concerns at least warranted more subversive epistemic commitments than Frankenberg allows. In the wake of Comparative Law As Critique , the second part of this commentary addresses these contentions with a view to making a case both for comparative law as strong critique and for the paradigmatic epistemic turn that has been persistently deferred within the field." @default.
- W2922519709 created "2019-03-22" @default.
- W2922519709 creator A5007175703 @default.
- W2922519709 creator A5065543960 @default.
- W2922519709 date "2017-05-01" @default.
- W2922519709 modified "2023-10-18" @default.
- W2922519709 title "Law, Comparatism, and Epistemic Governance: There Is Critique and Critique" @default.
- W2922519709 cites W2221236894 @default.
- W2922519709 cites W2486955837 @default.
- W2922519709 cites W2503905043 @default.
- W2922519709 cites W4205894471 @default.
- W2922519709 cites W4207045966 @default.
- W2922519709 cites W4235561755 @default.
- W2922519709 cites W4237630206 @default.
- W2922519709 cites W4298283971 @default.
- W2922519709 cites W4298337272 @default.
- W2922519709 cites W587172163 @default.
- W2922519709 cites W638349174 @default.
- W2922519709 doi "https://doi.org/10.1017/s2071832200022136" @default.
- W2922519709 hasPublicationYear "2017" @default.
- W2922519709 type Work @default.
- W2922519709 sameAs 2922519709 @default.
- W2922519709 citedByCount "3" @default.
- W2922519709 countsByYear W29225197092018 @default.
- W2922519709 countsByYear W29225197092020 @default.
- W2922519709 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
- W2922519709 hasAuthorship W2922519709A5007175703 @default.
- W2922519709 hasAuthorship W2922519709A5065543960 @default.
- W2922519709 hasBestOaLocation W29225197091 @default.
- W2922519709 hasConcept C111472728 @default.
- W2922519709 hasConcept C138885662 @default.
- W2922519709 hasConcept C144024400 @default.
- W2922519709 hasConcept C145038440 @default.
- W2922519709 hasConcept C17744445 @default.
- W2922519709 hasConcept C190253527 @default.
- W2922519709 hasConcept C199539241 @default.
- W2922519709 hasConcept C2482559 @default.
- W2922519709 hasConcept C2777617010 @default.
- W2922519709 hasConceptScore W2922519709C111472728 @default.
- W2922519709 hasConceptScore W2922519709C138885662 @default.
- W2922519709 hasConceptScore W2922519709C144024400 @default.
- W2922519709 hasConceptScore W2922519709C145038440 @default.
- W2922519709 hasConceptScore W2922519709C17744445 @default.
- W2922519709 hasConceptScore W2922519709C190253527 @default.
- W2922519709 hasConceptScore W2922519709C199539241 @default.
- W2922519709 hasConceptScore W2922519709C2482559 @default.
- W2922519709 hasConceptScore W2922519709C2777617010 @default.
- W2922519709 hasIssue "3" @default.
- W2922519709 hasLocation W29225197091 @default.
- W2922519709 hasOpenAccess W2922519709 @default.
- W2922519709 hasPrimaryLocation W29225197091 @default.
- W2922519709 hasRelatedWork W2011069718 @default.
- W2922519709 hasRelatedWork W2041404423 @default.
- W2922519709 hasRelatedWork W2129570094 @default.
- W2922519709 hasRelatedWork W2155284065 @default.
- W2922519709 hasRelatedWork W2554722400 @default.
- W2922519709 hasRelatedWork W2592622509 @default.
- W2922519709 hasRelatedWork W2748952813 @default.
- W2922519709 hasRelatedWork W2899084033 @default.
- W2922519709 hasRelatedWork W4212975384 @default.
- W2922519709 hasRelatedWork W4223533293 @default.
- W2922519709 hasVolume "18" @default.
- W2922519709 isParatext "false" @default.
- W2922519709 isRetracted "false" @default.
- W2922519709 magId "2922519709" @default.
- W2922519709 workType "article" @default.