FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W292310558> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W292310558 endingPage "324" @default.
• W292310558 startingPage "293" @default.
• W292310558 abstract "I. INTRODUCTION President William J. Clinton recently addressed prominent state and local officials as well as many foreign dignitaries at conference on federalism. In his opening remarks, he observed, I think it is quite an interesting thing that we have this impressive array of people to come to conference on federalism, topic that probably 10 or 20 years ago would have been viewed as substitute for sleeping pill.1 Yet President Clinton's position on federalism has received sizable attention as of late. Federalism is hot topic in the executive branch, as well as other branches of the government, with the Supreme Court hearing several cases dealing specifically with the limits of congressional power in its 1999-2000 term,2 and Congress pushing federalism bills through the House and the Senate to codify federalism philosophy.3 It was President Clinton's enactment of Executive 13,083 in 1998, however, that united, as well as enraged, state and local groups in an effort to return to federalism policy as set by President Ronald Reagan in 1987. Over the course of the past year, President Clinton has issued not one, but three, executive orders delineating the executive branch's policy on federalism. Executive 13,083 (1998 Order)4 was the first and most provocative. Quietly issued in May, the 1998 changed, without consulting state and local officials, the executive branch federalism policy that had been in place since President Reagan's Executive 12,612 (Reagan Order).5 It was originally scheduled to take effect on August 12, 1998;6 however, under barrage of criticism from members of Congress and state and local interest groups,7 President Clinton issued Executive 13,095 ( Suspension Order ),8 indefinitely suspending the implementation of the 1998 Order. Opponents claimed that the 1998 was wrongheaded and unacceptable, serious step backward from the previous Reagan signed in 1987, and demanded that the order be withdrawn.9 The Clinton camp responded by stating, 'We thought there were no real substantive changes... but in retrospect, it wouldn't have hurt' to review the new language with the state and local officials.10 The suspension of the 1998 allowed time for state and local governments to consult with the Clinton administration about federalism policy issues.11 After over year of negotiations between state leaders and the White House,12 Executive 13,132 (1999 Order)13 was issued in August of last year. It has been touted as strengthening the partnership with state and local government,14 and a very positive development by state and local leaders.15 In letter to President Clinton, Clarence Anthony, President of the National League of Cities, stated that state and local groups have been encouraged by your commitment to crafting an enforceable executive order that seeks to the needs of federal, state, and local governments in order to achieve that true partnership among all levels of government envisioned by America's founding fathers.16 As it happened, however, the balance struck by the 1999 was actually near-complete reinstatement of the Reagan Order. With few exceptions, every change attempted by the 1998 has been changed back to the original language of the Reagan Order, and much of the Reagan language has even been strengthened. This Comment traces the evolution of the 1999 Order. Part II gives brief history of the use of executive orders and describes how they are used today. Part III gives an introduction to the major ideological contents of the Reagan and the 1998 and 1999 Clinton Orders and describes the events surrounding their creation. Part IV compares the orders' major substantive aspects, and demonstrates how state and local groups' wishes have prevailed. It also argues that had the 1998 remained in place, the would have allowed the executive branch to regulate in areas traditionally outside its regulatory authority and wrongly impinged on state self government. …" @default.
• W292310558 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W292310558 creator A5037928764 @default.
• W292310558 date "2000-01-01" @default.
• W292310558 modified "2023-09-26" @default.
• W292310558 title "Presidential Power Grab or Pure State Might? A Modern Debate over Executive Interpretations on Federalism" @default.
• W292310558 hasPublicationYear "2000" @default.
• W292310558 type Work @default.
• W292310558 sameAs 292310558 @default.
• W292310558 citedByCount "0" @default.
• W292310558 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W292310558 hasAuthorship W292310558A5037928764 @default.
• W292310558 hasConcept C11413529 @default.
• W292310558 hasConcept C121332964 @default.
• W292310558 hasConcept C126053111 @default.
• W292310558 hasConcept C129794794 @default.
• W292310558 hasConcept C163258240 @default.
• W292310558 hasConcept C17744445 @default.
• W292310558 hasConcept C197487636 @default.
• W292310558 hasConcept C199539241 @default.
• W292310558 hasConcept C2776154427 @default.
• W292310558 hasConcept C2778272461 @default.
• W292310558 hasConcept C3116431 @default.
• W292310558 hasConcept C31875427 @default.
• W292310558 hasConcept C41008148 @default.
• W292310558 hasConcept C48103436 @default.
• W292310558 hasConcept C533735693 @default.
• W292310558 hasConcept C62520636 @default.
• W292310558 hasConcept C94625758 @default.
• W292310558 hasConceptScore W292310558C11413529 @default.
• W292310558 hasConceptScore W292310558C121332964 @default.
• W292310558 hasConceptScore W292310558C126053111 @default.
• W292310558 hasConceptScore W292310558C129794794 @default.
• W292310558 hasConceptScore W292310558C163258240 @default.
• W292310558 hasConceptScore W292310558C17744445 @default.
• W292310558 hasConceptScore W292310558C197487636 @default.
• W292310558 hasConceptScore W292310558C199539241 @default.
• W292310558 hasConceptScore W292310558C2776154427 @default.
• W292310558 hasConceptScore W292310558C2778272461 @default.
• W292310558 hasConceptScore W292310558C3116431 @default.
• W292310558 hasConceptScore W292310558C31875427 @default.
• W292310558 hasConceptScore W292310558C41008148 @default.
• W292310558 hasConceptScore W292310558C48103436 @default.
• W292310558 hasConceptScore W292310558C533735693 @default.
• W292310558 hasConceptScore W292310558C62520636 @default.
• W292310558 hasConceptScore W292310558C94625758 @default.
• W292310558 hasIssue "1" @default.
• W292310558 hasLocation W2923105581 @default.
• W292310558 hasOpenAccess W292310558 @default.
• W292310558 hasPrimaryLocation W2923105581 @default.
• W292310558 hasRelatedWork W108154463 @default.
• W292310558 hasRelatedWork W1989158909 @default.
• W292310558 hasRelatedWork W1994564065 @default.
• W292310558 hasRelatedWork W2047209104 @default.
• W292310558 hasRelatedWork W2117767414 @default.
• W292310558 hasRelatedWork W2138893002 @default.
• W292310558 hasRelatedWork W2171528822 @default.
• W292310558 hasRelatedWork W218234872 @default.
• W292310558 hasRelatedWork W2297470225 @default.
• W292310558 hasRelatedWork W2319399461 @default.
• W292310558 hasRelatedWork W2495426757 @default.
• W292310558 hasRelatedWork W2567606776 @default.
• W292310558 hasRelatedWork W2649204815 @default.
• W292310558 hasRelatedWork W3014562042 @default.
• W292310558 hasRelatedWork W3123836359 @default.
• W292310558 hasRelatedWork W3168024287 @default.
• W292310558 hasRelatedWork W65730199 @default.
• W292310558 hasRelatedWork W80453693 @default.
• W292310558 hasRelatedWork W181476940 @default.
• W292310558 hasRelatedWork W3125598527 @default.
• W292310558 hasVolume "2000" @default.
• W292310558 isParatext "false" @default.
• W292310558 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W292310558 magId "292310558" @default.
• W292310558 workType "article" @default.