FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2923968800> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2923968800 endingPage "244" @default.
• W2923968800 startingPage "224" @default.
• W2923968800 abstract "Purpose The line of balance (LOB) method is a suitable scheduling technique that managers can use to support lean planning efforts for projects composed of repetitive activities such as high-rise building construction. Like any other method, LOB has certain disadvantages that create a set of practical limitations in its application. An LOB schedule gives insights about how continuous and synchronized single resources are scheduled and how uniform these resources are distributed over the project duration. However, these three characteristics have to be visually checked, which makes the evaluation and the comparison of different schedule alternatives difficult. To overcome this problem, the purpose of this paper is to present a quantitative method to calculate quality degrees for the continuity, the synchronization and the uniformity of an LOB schedule that can be applied to assess an LOB schedule globally. Design/methodology/approach The paper introduces a set of global indicators, termed quality degrees, which allow for a quick quantitative evaluation of LOB schedules at the global level. These quality degrees are quantitative indicators for the: degree of continuity, degree of synchronization and degree of uniformity within a specific LOB alternative. A mathematical model was developed to calculate the quality degrees for LOB schedules. This model was validated using a well-known case study extracted from literature, and its practical implementation was exemplified on two real Romanian projects. Findings The paper illustrates this contribution using two case studies that confirm that the proposed method can be used to evaluate different schedule alternatives. In particular, the paper shows that quality indicators can be used to analyze and control interdependencies between cost and time. Research limitations/implications The main limitation of the proposed method is that it cannot indicate the desired level of continuity, synchronization or uniformity to be achieved. Further studies need to explore this possibility, as well the relationship between indicators. Practical implications The presented quality indicators contribute to existing LOB methods as they allow for the quick analysis and assessment of schedules without an in-depth visual analysis. Originality/value The paper proposes an innovative method, mathematically formulated, to quantitatively assess the quality aspects of continuity, synchronization and uniformity for LOB schedules." @default.
• W2923968800 created "2019-04-01" @default.
• W2923968800 creator A5044463484 @default.
• W2923968800 creator A5089622885 @default.
• W2923968800 creator A5026410563 @default.
• W2923968800 date "2019-03-26" @default.
• W2923968800 modified "2023-10-18" @default.
• W2923968800 title "Quantitative lean assessment of line of balance schedules’ quality" @default.
• W2923968800 cites W1479690099 @default.
• W2923968800 cites W1971654746 @default.
• W2923968800 cites W1972441949 @default.
• W2923968800 cites W1974209832 @default.
• W2923968800 cites W1978467855 @default.
• W2923968800 cites W1981936167 @default.
• W2923968800 cites W1986380466 @default.
• W2923968800 cites W1990647175 @default.
• W2923968800 cites W2004393694 @default.
• W2923968800 cites W2005733202 @default.
• W2923968800 cites W2016415491 @default.
• W2923968800 cites W2022286735 @default.
• W2923968800 cites W2022975287 @default.
• W2923968800 cites W2023012055 @default.
• W2923968800 cites W2024854933 @default.
• W2923968800 cites W2025104219 @default.
• W2923968800 cites W2030253327 @default.
• W2923968800 cites W2030525697 @default.
• W2923968800 cites W2035113554 @default.
• W2923968800 cites W2036965124 @default.
• W2923968800 cites W2042773241 @default.
• W2923968800 cites W2054990985 @default.
• W2923968800 cites W2057214931 @default.
• W2923968800 cites W2057294636 @default.
• W2923968800 cites W2069846099 @default.
• W2923968800 cites W2069937638 @default.
• W2923968800 cites W2075016746 @default.
• W2923968800 cites W2082391959 @default.
• W2923968800 cites W2086505682 @default.
• W2923968800 cites W2105760447 @default.
• W2923968800 cites W2108629530 @default.
• W2923968800 cites W2110392196 @default.
• W2923968800 cites W2118289675 @default.
• W2923968800 cites W2129514501 @default.
• W2923968800 cites W2141739264 @default.
• W2923968800 cites W2555012946 @default.
• W2923968800 cites W4232727599 @default.
• W2923968800 doi "https://doi.org/10.1108/ecam-05-2017-0088" @default.
• W2923968800 hasPublicationYear "2019" @default.
• W2923968800 type Work @default.
• W2923968800 sameAs 2923968800 @default.
• W2923968800 citedByCount "3" @default.
• W2923968800 countsByYear W29239688002022 @default.
• W2923968800 countsByYear W29239688002023 @default.
• W2923968800 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2923968800 hasAuthorship W2923968800A5026410563 @default.
• W2923968800 hasAuthorship W2923968800A5044463484 @default.
• W2923968800 hasAuthorship W2923968800A5089622885 @default.
• W2923968800 hasConcept C111472728 @default.
• W2923968800 hasConcept C111919701 @default.
• W2923968800 hasConcept C112758219 @default.
• W2923968800 hasConcept C124952713 @default.
• W2923968800 hasConcept C127162648 @default.
• W2923968800 hasConcept C127413603 @default.
• W2923968800 hasConcept C13736549 @default.
• W2923968800 hasConcept C138885662 @default.
• W2923968800 hasConcept C142362112 @default.
• W2923968800 hasConcept C177264268 @default.
• W2923968800 hasConcept C199360897 @default.
• W2923968800 hasConcept C200601418 @default.
• W2923968800 hasConcept C206729178 @default.
• W2923968800 hasConcept C21547014 @default.
• W2923968800 hasConcept C2778562939 @default.
• W2923968800 hasConcept C2779530757 @default.
• W2923968800 hasConcept C31258907 @default.
• W2923968800 hasConcept C41008148 @default.
• W2923968800 hasConcept C42475967 @default.
• W2923968800 hasConcept C68387754 @default.
• W2923968800 hasConceptScore W2923968800C111472728 @default.
• W2923968800 hasConceptScore W2923968800C111919701 @default.
• W2923968800 hasConceptScore W2923968800C112758219 @default.
• W2923968800 hasConceptScore W2923968800C124952713 @default.
• W2923968800 hasConceptScore W2923968800C127162648 @default.
• W2923968800 hasConceptScore W2923968800C127413603 @default.
• W2923968800 hasConceptScore W2923968800C13736549 @default.
• W2923968800 hasConceptScore W2923968800C138885662 @default.
• W2923968800 hasConceptScore W2923968800C142362112 @default.
• W2923968800 hasConceptScore W2923968800C177264268 @default.
• W2923968800 hasConceptScore W2923968800C199360897 @default.
• W2923968800 hasConceptScore W2923968800C200601418 @default.
• W2923968800 hasConceptScore W2923968800C206729178 @default.
• W2923968800 hasConceptScore W2923968800C21547014 @default.
• W2923968800 hasConceptScore W2923968800C2778562939 @default.
• W2923968800 hasConceptScore W2923968800C2779530757 @default.
• W2923968800 hasConceptScore W2923968800C31258907 @default.
• W2923968800 hasConceptScore W2923968800C41008148 @default.
• W2923968800 hasConceptScore W2923968800C42475967 @default.
• W2923968800 hasConceptScore W2923968800C68387754 @default.
• W2923968800 hasIssue "2" @default.
• W2923968800 hasLocation W29239688001 @default.

• next