FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2926508091> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2926508091 endingPage "487" @default.
• W2926508091 startingPage "478" @default.
• W2926508091 abstract "Describir un acuerdo entre expertos basado en la evidencia y la experiencia sobre los aspectos más relevantes del paciente exacerbador con EPOC. Se siguió la metodología Delphi. Tras revisar la evidencia por un comité científico y 60 expertos, se elaboró un cuestionario con 3 apartados: diagnóstico del paciente exacerbador; tratamiento, y proceso asistencial. La encuesta fue respondida online en 2 rondas por 60 neumólogos. El grado de acuerdo siguió la escala Likert de 1 (total desacuerdo) a 9 (total acuerdo), definiéndose acuerdo y desacuerdo como una puntuación de 7-9 o 1-3, respectivamente, otorgada por más de dos tercios de los participantes. Se incluyeron un total de 48 aseveraciones, una añadida en la segunda ronda. Hubo consenso en 37 (78,7%) tras la primera ronda (acuerdo), y en 43 (89,5%) tras la segunda (42 acuerdo y 1 desacuerdo). Las afirmaciones con mayor proporción de expertos en el rango de acuerdo se refirieron a que, en el paciente exacerbador, la infección bronquial crónica favorece el deterioro de la función pulmonar (93,1%), a que no se deben retirar los broncodilatadores de larga duración (93,1%), a la conveniencia de personalizar el tratamiento si se dan nuevas exacerbaciones pese a un tratamiento broncodilatador óptimo (96,6%), o al cuidado y manejo de este paciente, que debe ser coordinado entre atención primaria y neumología (93,1%) y controlado en programas integrados específicos multicomponente (94,8%). La información proporcionada por este consenso puede facilitar el diagnóstico y tratamiento del paciente exacerbador con EPOC en nuestro ámbito. To describe an evidence- and experience-based expert consensus on the most relevant issues of patients with COPD exacerbations. The Delphi technique was used. Evidence was reviewed by a scientific committee and 60 experts. A questionnaire was prepared containing 3 sections: diagnosis of the exacerbator; treatment, and healthcare processes. The survey was answered in 2 rounds by 60 pneumologists on an online platform. Statements were scored on a Likert scale from 1 (total disagreement) to 9 (total agreement). Agreement and disagreement were defined as a score of 7-9 or 1-3, respectively, given by more than two thirds of the participants. A total of 48 statements were included, one of which was added in the second round. Consensus was reached in 37 items (78.7%) after the first round (agreement), and in 43 (89.5%) after the second round (42 agreement, 1 disagreement). The statements with the highest proportion of experts agreeing were as follows: in exacerbators, chronic bronchial infection favors lung function decline (93.1%); long-acting bronchodilators should not be withdrawn (93.1%); treatment must be personalized if new exacerbations occur despite optimal bronchodilator treatment (96.6%); management must be coordinated between primary care and the respiratory medicine department (93.1%), and patients must be followed up in specific integrated multicomponent programs (94.8%). The findings of this study could assist in the diagnosis and treatment of COPD exacerbators in our area." @default.
• W2926508091 created "2019-04-11" @default.
• W2926508091 creator A5004389739 @default.
• W2926508091 creator A5038171945 @default.
• W2926508091 creator A5040139278 @default.
• W2926508091 creator A5051691687 @default.
• W2926508091 creator A5066030535 @default.
• W2926508091 creator A5071831143 @default.
• W2926508091 creator A5078491071 @default.
• W2926508091 date "2019-09-01" @default.
• W2926508091 modified "2023-10-18" @default.
• W2926508091 title "Paciente exacerbador con enfermedad pulmonar obstructiva crónica: recomendaciones en procesos diagnósticos, terapéuticos y asistenciales" @default.
• W2926508091 cites W1907868111 @default.
• W2926508091 cites W1966250423 @default.
• W2926508091 cites W1984512240 @default.
• W2926508091 cites W1987495287 @default.
• W2926508091 cites W2002726093 @default.
• W2926508091 cites W2048616866 @default.
• W2926508091 cites W2053348159 @default.
• W2926508091 cites W2054675838 @default.
• W2926508091 cites W2059055334 @default.
• W2926508091 cites W2066721282 @default.
• W2926508091 cites W2099143922 @default.
• W2926508091 cites W2106232279 @default.
• W2926508091 cites W2109676782 @default.
• W2926508091 cites W2112162293 @default.
• W2926508091 cites W2121230179 @default.
• W2926508091 cites W2122691068 @default.
• W2926508091 cites W2122790962 @default.
• W2926508091 cites W2124531969 @default.
• W2926508091 cites W2128035733 @default.
• W2926508091 cites W2130138851 @default.
• W2926508091 cites W2146877487 @default.
• W2926508091 cites W2149849734 @default.
• W2926508091 cites W2155765761 @default.
• W2926508091 cites W2161713331 @default.
• W2926508091 cites W2193352537 @default.
• W2926508091 cites W2344148139 @default.
• W2926508091 cites W2346803653 @default.
• W2926508091 cites W2514209421 @default.
• W2926508091 cites W2528385426 @default.
• W2926508091 cites W2592919648 @default.
• W2926508091 cites W2610956233 @default.
• W2926508091 cites W2758346478 @default.
• W2926508091 cites W2785999277 @default.
• W2926508091 cites W2802221596 @default.
• W2926508091 cites W2900984675 @default.
• W2926508091 doi "https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arbres.2019.02.020" @default.
• W2926508091 hasPublicationYear "2019" @default.
• W2926508091 type Work @default.
• W2926508091 sameAs 2926508091 @default.
• W2926508091 citedByCount "16" @default.
• W2926508091 countsByYear W29265080912019 @default.
• W2926508091 countsByYear W29265080912020 @default.
• W2926508091 countsByYear W29265080912021 @default.
• W2926508091 countsByYear W29265080912022 @default.
• W2926508091 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2926508091 hasAuthorship W2926508091A5004389739 @default.
• W2926508091 hasAuthorship W2926508091A5038171945 @default.
• W2926508091 hasAuthorship W2926508091A5040139278 @default.
• W2926508091 hasAuthorship W2926508091A5051691687 @default.
• W2926508091 hasAuthorship W2926508091A5066030535 @default.
• W2926508091 hasAuthorship W2926508091A5071831143 @default.
• W2926508091 hasAuthorship W2926508091A5078491071 @default.
• W2926508091 hasConcept C142362112 @default.
• W2926508091 hasConcept C15708023 @default.
• W2926508091 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W2926508091 hasConceptScore W2926508091C142362112 @default.
• W2926508091 hasConceptScore W2926508091C15708023 @default.
• W2926508091 hasConceptScore W2926508091C71924100 @default.
• W2926508091 hasIssue "9" @default.
• W2926508091 hasLocation W29265080911 @default.
• W2926508091 hasOpenAccess W2926508091 @default.
• W2926508091 hasPrimaryLocation W29265080911 @default.
• W2926508091 hasRelatedWork W1506200166 @default.
• W2926508091 hasRelatedWork W1995515455 @default.
• W2926508091 hasRelatedWork W2039318446 @default.
• W2926508091 hasRelatedWork W2048182022 @default.
• W2926508091 hasRelatedWork W2080531066 @default.
• W2926508091 hasRelatedWork W2604872355 @default.
• W2926508091 hasRelatedWork W2748952813 @default.
• W2926508091 hasRelatedWork W2899084033 @default.
• W2926508091 hasRelatedWork W3032375762 @default.
• W2926508091 hasRelatedWork W3108674512 @default.
• W2926508091 hasVolume "55" @default.
• W2926508091 isParatext "false" @default.
• W2926508091 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W2926508091 magId "2926508091" @default.
• W2926508091 workType "article" @default.