FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2927600797> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2927600797 endingPage "279" @default.
• W2927600797 startingPage "273" @default.
• W2927600797 abstract "Abstract Background Diagnosis and classification of chronic osteomyelitis is not based on any objective criteria. None of the available methods for this is completely reliable. Tienmann et al. (2014) has described the so called histopathological osteomyelitis evaluation score (HOES) to overcome this limitation. But this has not been externally validated or tested in cases with foot osteomyelitis. Methods We prospectively reviewed the histopathological samples of 30 consecutive patients (30 feet) with foot osteomyelitis managed operatively. There were 19 males and 11 females with an average age of 41.6 (range, 27–63) years. The underlying pathology was spina bifida in 12, Charcot’s arthropathy in eleven and post-traumatic in seven patients. The bones involved were calcaneum, talus and fifth metatarsal. Pathological diagnosis was made based on HOES by a single pathologist blinded to the clinical diagnosis and both were compared. Intra- and inter-observer reliability of HOES was assessed by analysing the scores of each patient assigned independently by four different pathologists (blinded to the clinical diagnoses and to each other) at two different occasions one week apart. Results All samples showed features of long-standing osteomyelitis. When attempting to classify to “acute on chronic”, “chronic” and “quiescent” forms, the pathological diagnosis correlatead with the clinical diagnosis only in 16 cases (53.3 percent). Histological classification to Tienmann’s types as per the scoring system yielded three distinct pathological entities that had common histological features with regard to bone, soft tissue and inflammatory infiltration. HOES exhibited excellent intra- and inter-observer reliability. Conclusions HOES is well applicable in foot osteomyelitis both for diagnosis and classification by unambiguous and precise scoring system. This makes diagnostic labelling more accurate and repeatable. The clinical relevance of these histopathological types in guiding management and determining prognosis needs to be investigated further." @default.
• W2927600797 created "2019-04-11" @default.
• W2927600797 creator A5006819516 @default.
• W2927600797 creator A5011155880 @default.
• W2927600797 creator A5017597938 @default.
• W2927600797 creator A5024289389 @default.
• W2927600797 creator A5050243548 @default.
• W2927600797 creator A5075417123 @default.
• W2927600797 date "2020-04-01" @default.
• W2927600797 modified "2023-09-23" @default.
• W2927600797 title "Applicability of histopathological osteomyelitis evaluation score (HOES) in chronic osteomyelitis of the foot — A feasibility study" @default.
• W2927600797 cites W2000696525 @default.
• W2927600797 cites W2026726283 @default.
• W2927600797 cites W2040330449 @default.
• W2927600797 cites W213498477 @default.
• W2927600797 cites W2136259975 @default.
• W2927600797 cites W2149087487 @default.
• W2927600797 cites W2160857582 @default.
• W2927600797 cites W2170387487 @default.
• W2927600797 cites W2412207551 @default.
• W2927600797 cites W2766210214 @default.
• W2927600797 cites W2769691606 @default.
• W2927600797 cites W960797454 @default.
• W2927600797 doi "https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fas.2019.03.008" @default.
• W2927600797 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/31000385" @default.
• W2927600797 hasPublicationYear "2020" @default.
• W2927600797 type Work @default.
• W2927600797 sameAs 2927600797 @default.
• W2927600797 citedByCount "2" @default.
• W2927600797 countsByYear W29276007972021 @default.
• W2927600797 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2927600797 hasAuthorship W2927600797A5006819516 @default.
• W2927600797 hasAuthorship W2927600797A5011155880 @default.
• W2927600797 hasAuthorship W2927600797A5017597938 @default.
• W2927600797 hasAuthorship W2927600797A5024289389 @default.
• W2927600797 hasAuthorship W2927600797A5050243548 @default.
• W2927600797 hasAuthorship W2927600797A5075417123 @default.
• W2927600797 hasConcept C115076146 @default.
• W2927600797 hasConcept C138885662 @default.
• W2927600797 hasConcept C141071460 @default.
• W2927600797 hasConcept C2780551157 @default.
• W2927600797 hasConcept C41895202 @default.
• W2927600797 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W2927600797 hasConceptScore W2927600797C115076146 @default.
• W2927600797 hasConceptScore W2927600797C138885662 @default.
• W2927600797 hasConceptScore W2927600797C141071460 @default.
• W2927600797 hasConceptScore W2927600797C2780551157 @default.
• W2927600797 hasConceptScore W2927600797C41895202 @default.
• W2927600797 hasConceptScore W2927600797C71924100 @default.
• W2927600797 hasIssue "3" @default.
• W2927600797 hasLocation W29276007971 @default.
• W2927600797 hasOpenAccess W2927600797 @default.
• W2927600797 hasPrimaryLocation W29276007971 @default.
• W2927600797 hasRelatedWork W2066758018 @default.
• W2927600797 hasRelatedWork W2157775732 @default.
• W2927600797 hasRelatedWork W2389704575 @default.
• W2927600797 hasRelatedWork W2398927681 @default.
• W2927600797 hasRelatedWork W2417128075 @default.
• W2927600797 hasRelatedWork W2898071316 @default.
• W2927600797 hasRelatedWork W3209974247 @default.
• W2927600797 hasRelatedWork W4225884067 @default.
• W2927600797 hasRelatedWork W4246357551 @default.
• W2927600797 hasRelatedWork W4322723086 @default.
• W2927600797 hasVolume "26" @default.
• W2927600797 isParatext "false" @default.
• W2927600797 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W2927600797 magId "2927600797" @default.
• W2927600797 workType "article" @default.