FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2927856042> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2927856042 endingPage "528" @default.
• W2927856042 startingPage "523" @default.
• W2927856042 abstract "•APC Flash-Free brackets can be effectively used in clinical orthodontics. •The failure rates of APC Plus brackets are greater than those of APC Flash-Free brackets. •Bonding the APC Flash-Free brackets is easier than the APC Plus brackets, and it is possible to save 4.22 minutes for a full mouth bonding. Objective To compare the clinical bracket failure rate and bonding time differences between Adhesive Precoated Flash-Free (APCF) and Adhesive Precoated Plus (APCP) bracket systems. Methods Thirty-three patients (7 male and 26 female) with a mean age of 17.2 ± 3.6 years and permanent dentition were included in the study. Total of 660 brackets were bonded by 1 operator with the use of a split-mouth design, and bracket failure rates were observed over 6 months. Bracket bonding time of each group was also evaluated. Bracket failure rates were evaluated by means of chi-square test. One-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) and Tukey honestly significant difference tests were used to evaluate the bonding time differences between groups. Results The overall, APCF, and APCP bracket failure rates were 1.21%, 1.81%, and 1.51%, respectively. Chi-square test revealed significant differences (P <0.01) between groups in bracket failure rates. The upper left APCP group showed significantly (P <0.05) more failure than the other groups. One-way ANOVA test (P <0.001) showed statistically significant bonding time differences between groups. Bonding time of APCF brackets was significantly shorter than the bonding time of APCP brackets for the same quadrants. Chi-square test did not reveal significant differences (P >0.05) between groups according to adhesive remnant index scores. Conclusions Compared with APCP brackets, APCF brackets can reduce the bonding time without increasing bracket failure rate. To compare the clinical bracket failure rate and bonding time differences between Adhesive Precoated Flash-Free (APCF) and Adhesive Precoated Plus (APCP) bracket systems. Thirty-three patients (7 male and 26 female) with a mean age of 17.2 ± 3.6 years and permanent dentition were included in the study. Total of 660 brackets were bonded by 1 operator with the use of a split-mouth design, and bracket failure rates were observed over 6 months. Bracket bonding time of each group was also evaluated. Bracket failure rates were evaluated by means of chi-square test. One-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) and Tukey honestly significant difference tests were used to evaluate the bonding time differences between groups. The overall, APCF, and APCP bracket failure rates were 1.21%, 1.81%, and 1.51%, respectively. Chi-square test revealed significant differences (P <0.01) between groups in bracket failure rates. The upper left APCP group showed significantly (P <0.05) more failure than the other groups. One-way ANOVA test (P <0.001) showed statistically significant bonding time differences between groups. Bonding time of APCF brackets was significantly shorter than the bonding time of APCP brackets for the same quadrants. Chi-square test did not reveal significant differences (P >0.05) between groups according to adhesive remnant index scores. Compared with APCP brackets, APCF brackets can reduce the bonding time without increasing bracket failure rate." @default.
• W2927856042 created "2019-04-11" @default.
• W2927856042 creator A5071945008 @default.
• W2927856042 creator A5089497874 @default.
• W2927856042 date "2019-04-01" @default.
• W2927856042 modified "2023-10-09" @default.
• W2927856042 title "Comparison of clinical bond failure rates and bonding times between two adhesive precoated bracket systems" @default.
• W2927856042 cites W1921181711 @default.
• W2927856042 cites W1945885179 @default.
• W2927856042 cites W1971258074 @default.
• W2927856042 cites W1982689290 @default.
• W2927856042 cites W1985436716 @default.
• W2927856042 cites W1994269025 @default.
• W2927856042 cites W1999803086 @default.
• W2927856042 cites W2006353474 @default.
• W2927856042 cites W2015449965 @default.
• W2927856042 cites W2027065113 @default.
• W2927856042 cites W2044910109 @default.
• W2927856042 cites W2054767504 @default.
• W2927856042 cites W2067135617 @default.
• W2927856042 cites W2067239956 @default.
• W2927856042 cites W2089458778 @default.
• W2927856042 cites W2096068693 @default.
• W2927856042 cites W2124235183 @default.
• W2927856042 cites W2158076186 @default.
• W2927856042 cites W2407485456 @default.
• W2927856042 doi "https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2018.12.010" @default.
• W2927856042 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/30935607" @default.
• W2927856042 hasPublicationYear "2019" @default.
• W2927856042 type Work @default.
• W2927856042 sameAs 2927856042 @default.
• W2927856042 citedByCount "9" @default.
• W2927856042 countsByYear W29278560422020 @default.
• W2927856042 countsByYear W29278560422022 @default.
• W2927856042 countsByYear W29278560422023 @default.
• W2927856042 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2927856042 hasAuthorship W2927856042A5071945008 @default.
• W2927856042 hasAuthorship W2927856042A5089497874 @default.
• W2927856042 hasConcept C105795698 @default.
• W2927856042 hasConcept C120665830 @default.
• W2927856042 hasConcept C121332964 @default.
• W2927856042 hasConcept C127413603 @default.
• W2927856042 hasConcept C133769200 @default.
• W2927856042 hasConcept C139072283 @default.
• W2927856042 hasConcept C159985019 @default.
• W2927856042 hasConcept C192562407 @default.
• W2927856042 hasConcept C199343813 @default.
• W2927856042 hasConcept C2777526259 @default.
• W2927856042 hasConcept C2779227376 @default.
• W2927856042 hasConcept C3018023364 @default.
• W2927856042 hasConcept C33923547 @default.
• W2927856042 hasConcept C66938386 @default.
• W2927856042 hasConcept C68928338 @default.
• W2927856042 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W2927856042 hasConcept C99476002 @default.
• W2927856042 hasConceptScore W2927856042C105795698 @default.
• W2927856042 hasConceptScore W2927856042C120665830 @default.
• W2927856042 hasConceptScore W2927856042C121332964 @default.
• W2927856042 hasConceptScore W2927856042C127413603 @default.
• W2927856042 hasConceptScore W2927856042C133769200 @default.
• W2927856042 hasConceptScore W2927856042C139072283 @default.
• W2927856042 hasConceptScore W2927856042C159985019 @default.
• W2927856042 hasConceptScore W2927856042C192562407 @default.
• W2927856042 hasConceptScore W2927856042C199343813 @default.
• W2927856042 hasConceptScore W2927856042C2777526259 @default.
• W2927856042 hasConceptScore W2927856042C2779227376 @default.
• W2927856042 hasConceptScore W2927856042C3018023364 @default.
• W2927856042 hasConceptScore W2927856042C33923547 @default.
• W2927856042 hasConceptScore W2927856042C66938386 @default.
• W2927856042 hasConceptScore W2927856042C68928338 @default.
• W2927856042 hasConceptScore W2927856042C71924100 @default.
• W2927856042 hasConceptScore W2927856042C99476002 @default.
• W2927856042 hasIssue "4" @default.
• W2927856042 hasLocation W29278560421 @default.
• W2927856042 hasLocation W29278560422 @default.
• W2927856042 hasOpenAccess W2927856042 @default.
• W2927856042 hasPrimaryLocation W29278560421 @default.
• W2927856042 hasRelatedWork W2068473226 @default.
• W2927856042 hasRelatedWork W2112930064 @default.
• W2927856042 hasRelatedWork W2123531413 @default.
• W2927856042 hasRelatedWork W2521685293 @default.
• W2927856042 hasRelatedWork W2897346066 @default.
• W2927856042 hasRelatedWork W3082339370 @default.
• W2927856042 hasRelatedWork W3160018947 @default.
• W2927856042 hasRelatedWork W4248610452 @default.
• W2927856042 hasRelatedWork W4289545197 @default.
• W2927856042 hasRelatedWork W2612911679 @default.
• W2927856042 hasVolume "155" @default.
• W2927856042 isParatext "false" @default.
• W2927856042 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W2927856042 magId "2927856042" @default.
• W2927856042 workType "article" @default.