Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2929084496> ?p ?o ?g. }
Showing items 1 to 77 of
77
with 100 items per page.
- W2929084496 endingPage "367" @default.
- W2929084496 startingPage "327" @default.
- W2929084496 abstract "Monetary damage awards and permanent injunctions have long been viewed as complementary remedies: damages typically serve as compensation for past realized harm, and injunctions serve as a restriction against future unrealized harm. But some commentary in the patent literature also argues that the potential for injunctive relief is essential to provide deterrence against opportunistic or strategic patent infringement; in other words, that injunctions are in effect a punitive remedy. Given the eBay requirement of irreparable injury for equitable remedies, this assertion raises questions regarding the value of patent injunctions: what measure of monetary remedy, if any, will provide the equivalent deterrence to an injunction, and is there an incommensurable measure of injunctive deterrence that damages cannot provide?I consider these questions in the context of the global series of disputes surrounding “standard essential patents” (SEPs) in handheld telecommunication devices, a set of disputes sometimes dubbed the “smartphone wars.” This context provides a limiting instance for examining the punitive effects of injunctive relief. I suggest, first, that as a general rule damages may substitute for injunctions to deter bad faith behavior by patent infringers; second, that the literature supports such a substitution of damages for injunctive remedies in instances of bad faith or willfulness; and third, that substitute damages are appropriately modified or enhanced when bad faith or willfulness is found. I show that in the particular context of SEP infringement, these propositions leave open a path to deter strategic behavior by potential licensees, while setting remedial defaults that deter the more serious problem of strategic behavior by SEP owners. In doing so, I draw together and resolve several disparate strands of recent scholarship on patent remedies." @default.
- W2929084496 created "2019-04-11" @default.
- W2929084496 creator A5006320678 @default.
- W2929084496 date "2018-01-01" @default.
- W2929084496 modified "2023-09-23" @default.
- W2929084496 title "Punitive Patent Liability: A Comparative Examination" @default.
- W2929084496 hasPublicationYear "2018" @default.
- W2929084496 type Work @default.
- W2929084496 sameAs 2929084496 @default.
- W2929084496 citedByCount "0" @default.
- W2929084496 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
- W2929084496 hasAuthorship W2929084496A5006320678 @default.
- W2929084496 hasConcept C144133560 @default.
- W2929084496 hasConcept C151730666 @default.
- W2929084496 hasConcept C162324750 @default.
- W2929084496 hasConcept C17744445 @default.
- W2929084496 hasConcept C190253527 @default.
- W2929084496 hasConcept C199539241 @default.
- W2929084496 hasConcept C2776707044 @default.
- W2929084496 hasConcept C2777029862 @default.
- W2929084496 hasConcept C2777363581 @default.
- W2929084496 hasConcept C2777381055 @default.
- W2929084496 hasConcept C2777834853 @default.
- W2929084496 hasConcept C2778068216 @default.
- W2929084496 hasConcept C2779343474 @default.
- W2929084496 hasConcept C34974158 @default.
- W2929084496 hasConcept C60643870 @default.
- W2929084496 hasConcept C83645499 @default.
- W2929084496 hasConcept C86803240 @default.
- W2929084496 hasConceptScore W2929084496C144133560 @default.
- W2929084496 hasConceptScore W2929084496C151730666 @default.
- W2929084496 hasConceptScore W2929084496C162324750 @default.
- W2929084496 hasConceptScore W2929084496C17744445 @default.
- W2929084496 hasConceptScore W2929084496C190253527 @default.
- W2929084496 hasConceptScore W2929084496C199539241 @default.
- W2929084496 hasConceptScore W2929084496C2776707044 @default.
- W2929084496 hasConceptScore W2929084496C2777029862 @default.
- W2929084496 hasConceptScore W2929084496C2777363581 @default.
- W2929084496 hasConceptScore W2929084496C2777381055 @default.
- W2929084496 hasConceptScore W2929084496C2777834853 @default.
- W2929084496 hasConceptScore W2929084496C2778068216 @default.
- W2929084496 hasConceptScore W2929084496C2779343474 @default.
- W2929084496 hasConceptScore W2929084496C34974158 @default.
- W2929084496 hasConceptScore W2929084496C60643870 @default.
- W2929084496 hasConceptScore W2929084496C83645499 @default.
- W2929084496 hasConceptScore W2929084496C86803240 @default.
- W2929084496 hasIssue "3" @default.
- W2929084496 hasLocation W29290844961 @default.
- W2929084496 hasOpenAccess W2929084496 @default.
- W2929084496 hasPrimaryLocation W29290844961 @default.
- W2929084496 hasRelatedWork W1500203898 @default.
- W2929084496 hasRelatedWork W1714908156 @default.
- W2929084496 hasRelatedWork W1895232304 @default.
- W2929084496 hasRelatedWork W2096563107 @default.
- W2929084496 hasRelatedWork W2146521358 @default.
- W2929084496 hasRelatedWork W2206830412 @default.
- W2929084496 hasRelatedWork W2229241322 @default.
- W2929084496 hasRelatedWork W2264230123 @default.
- W2929084496 hasRelatedWork W2767411084 @default.
- W2929084496 hasRelatedWork W3123232051 @default.
- W2929084496 hasRelatedWork W3123580137 @default.
- W2929084496 hasRelatedWork W3124274107 @default.
- W2929084496 hasRelatedWork W3125347805 @default.
- W2929084496 hasRelatedWork W3125469466 @default.
- W2929084496 hasRelatedWork W3161781419 @default.
- W2929084496 hasRelatedWork W3171578825 @default.
- W2929084496 hasRelatedWork W391992378 @default.
- W2929084496 hasRelatedWork W1755384170 @default.
- W2929084496 hasRelatedWork W3095686450 @default.
- W2929084496 hasRelatedWork W3121436866 @default.
- W2929084496 hasVolume "36" @default.
- W2929084496 isParatext "false" @default.
- W2929084496 isRetracted "false" @default.
- W2929084496 magId "2929084496" @default.
- W2929084496 workType "article" @default.