FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2930777478> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2930777478 abstract "There is a long tradition of civil procedural reform in Europe. In England and Wales (England), for instance, a fetish is made of reform. It is embarked upon approximately every ten years. Equally, there is a long tradition – although perhaps not one that has always been carried out consciously – which has seen national civil procedural systems across Europe converge. As Sturner noted in 2004, England is the motherland of the common law and common law procedure, but the [Woolf reforms of 1999] bring English civil procedure closer to the Continent and indicate a remarkable convergence between the different systems. To a common lawyer, the view from England would be much the same. Convergence across systems has been a feature of the recent procedural past. Notwithstanding such convergence as there has been, there have been few conscious attempts to produce common principles of European civil procedure, unlike, for instance, attempts to articulate common principles of European contract law. There have been equally few attempts to produce a common code of civil procedure for Europe. In this chapter, one such attempt, the most recent one, to develop a common code of civil procedure for Europe is examined. That attempt is the project, entitled ‘From Transnational Principles to European Rules of Civil Procedure’ (hereafter referred to as ‘the project’), being carried out jointly by the European Law Institute (the ELI) and the International Institute for the Unification of Private Law (UNIDROIT). In particular, the project's background, methodology and early influence is examined. Finally, its potential future effect on both national and European Union civil procedure is considered. BACKGROUND TO THE PROJECT The project formally began in October 2013 via an initial exploratory workshop. Three factors lay behind its inception. The first was the lack of any principled progress, noted above, in the development of a common European Code of Civil Procedure. There is a suggestion – and it can be put no higher than that – that Sir Jack Jacob, England's leading civil procedural scholar from the 1960s until the end of the 1990s, attempted to devise a ‘uniform procedural code’ for the then European Common Market in the 1970s." @default.
• W2930777478 created "2019-04-11" @default.
• W2930777478 creator A5046867552 @default.
• W2930777478 date "2019-02-08" @default.
• W2930777478 modified "2023-09-24" @default.
• W2930777478 title "The ELI-UNIDROIT Project: An Introduction and an English Perspective" @default.
• W2930777478 doi "https://doi.org/10.1017/9781780688305.004" @default.
• W2930777478 hasPublicationYear "2019" @default.
• W2930777478 type Work @default.
• W2930777478 sameAs 2930777478 @default.
• W2930777478 citedByCount "0" @default.
• W2930777478 crossrefType "book-chapter" @default.
• W2930777478 hasAuthorship W2930777478A5046867552 @default.
• W2930777478 hasConcept C149209484 @default.
• W2930777478 hasConcept C162324750 @default.
• W2930777478 hasConcept C170706310 @default.
• W2930777478 hasConcept C17744445 @default.
• W2930777478 hasConcept C177986884 @default.
• W2930777478 hasConcept C199360897 @default.
• W2930777478 hasConcept C199539241 @default.
• W2930777478 hasConcept C2777303404 @default.
• W2930777478 hasConcept C2777701304 @default.
• W2930777478 hasConcept C2780677400 @default.
• W2930777478 hasConcept C41008148 @default.
• W2930777478 hasConcept C50522688 @default.
• W2930777478 hasConcept C538833194 @default.
• W2930777478 hasConcept C96146094 @default.
• W2930777478 hasConceptScore W2930777478C149209484 @default.
• W2930777478 hasConceptScore W2930777478C162324750 @default.
• W2930777478 hasConceptScore W2930777478C170706310 @default.
• W2930777478 hasConceptScore W2930777478C17744445 @default.
• W2930777478 hasConceptScore W2930777478C177986884 @default.
• W2930777478 hasConceptScore W2930777478C199360897 @default.
• W2930777478 hasConceptScore W2930777478C199539241 @default.
• W2930777478 hasConceptScore W2930777478C2777303404 @default.
• W2930777478 hasConceptScore W2930777478C2777701304 @default.
• W2930777478 hasConceptScore W2930777478C2780677400 @default.
• W2930777478 hasConceptScore W2930777478C41008148 @default.
• W2930777478 hasConceptScore W2930777478C50522688 @default.
• W2930777478 hasConceptScore W2930777478C538833194 @default.
• W2930777478 hasConceptScore W2930777478C96146094 @default.
• W2930777478 hasLocation W29307774781 @default.
• W2930777478 hasOpenAccess W2930777478 @default.
• W2930777478 hasPrimaryLocation W29307774781 @default.
• W2930777478 hasRelatedWork W1536064005 @default.
• W2930777478 hasRelatedWork W1582432669 @default.
• W2930777478 hasRelatedWork W1616344037 @default.
• W2930777478 hasRelatedWork W2336927287 @default.
• W2930777478 hasRelatedWork W2787824470 @default.
• W2930777478 hasRelatedWork W2900516151 @default.
• W2930777478 hasRelatedWork W2930777478 @default.
• W2930777478 hasRelatedWork W3159351392 @default.
• W2930777478 hasRelatedWork W3197779516 @default.
• W2930777478 hasRelatedWork W4205175468 @default.
• W2930777478 isParatext "false" @default.
• W2930777478 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W2930777478 magId "2930777478" @default.
• W2930777478 workType "book-chapter" @default.