FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2937355160> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2937355160 abstract "The interpretation, namely, the artistic interpretation can be viewed as one of the integral culture-forming phenomena. So it is worth of inter-disciplinary and inter-methodological studying. Traditionally, one of the dominant methodologies of researching the interpretative thematic was Hermeneutics, a methodology originating from Ancient Greece where it was applied to Homer’s poems. In the Middle Ages the hermeneutic operations were used to descry the ultimate meaning of the Holy Writ. Much later Schleiermacher invested Hermeneutics with a psychological meaning, using it as a means of understanding the inner world of other person, as it is expressed in the speech, and, especially in writing. This was the beginning of so-called Hermeneutics, the aim of which was to understand authors better than they understand themselves. Quite different approach was later suggested by M. Heidegger and his followers. Their Hermeneuticsin a way returns to the Medieval supposition of the manifestation of transcendental Being in a literary text. Therefore, the main task of a hermeneutist is to understand not the author as a person, but the implicit meanings of the text that can be quite different from the author’s intention. Such a presupposition is very close to the main principles of Ukrainian philosophical (and para-philosophical, expressed in belles-lettres) thought. Undoubtedly, both methodological Hermeneutics of Schleiermacher and ontological Hermeneutics of Heidegger and his followers have great euristic potential. Still, the contemporary situation of active inter-cultural and inter-civilization dialogue leads us to the necessity of enriching the Hermeneutic with the achievements of compatible methodologies (Analytical psychology, Structuralism, Morphology of Culture etc). All of these methodologies are centered on the transpersonal levels of the text, where the spirit of culture leaves its traces more clearly. An author here appears to be a medium, conducting independent, objective messages to the recipients. In a way, the same can be said about the mostly French post-philosophies (postmodernism, poststructuralism etc). The main difference is in the negative attitude of their representatives to such transpersonal messages. As the transcendental reality (Haidegger’s Being) is denied, the only transpersonal level left is the cultural subconsciousness that speaks through the author independently of his/her will. But, if K. G. Jung believed such a collective psyche to be full of spiritual treasures, French thinkers suspect that it contains only the suppressed complexes and traumas. This cardinal difference between the world outlooks does not forbid integrating the achievements of different methodological approaches into something new. The general goal of maximal understanding not only of the text, but its widest cultural context, allows us to define such a synthesizing approach as the Culturological Hermeneutics. Here different methodologies take their place on the different stages of studying the text. Analytical approach allows us to go into the details, synthetic – to return to the text as a whole. Thus we can turn a hermeneutic circle into a spiral and go ever deeper into the layers of meaning. Such a procedure demands studying the text in all possible cultural contexts: personal, social and universal. To do this we can make use of the term In our case it is a cultural paradigm, that characterizes the specific cultural features of a certain social entity. It leads us to investigating the cultural invariants, such as archetypes. It is wellknown, that they are remarkably constant, appearing worldwide through the ages. Still the specific set of archetypes and the way they are interpreted are unique for each cultural paradigm. This archetypal matrix can be seen in all the artistic works belonging to a paradigm. That is why Culturological Hermeneutics is to view an author both as a person and as a more or less typical representative of a certain cultural paradigm. It leads us from the traditional understanding of the artistic communication between author – text – recipient, to the intercultural communication in the global context. According to H.-G. Gadamer, the main purpose of hermeneutics is the achievement of understanding. This purpose is especially important in the times of great political, social and cultural changes, that demand, amid other things, the renovation of the lost traditions and liaisons. It makes hermeneutics, namely, culturological hermeneutics, that aims at the maximal understanding of a text and all its possible contexts, especially important." @default.
• W2937355160 created "2019-04-25" @default.
• W2937355160 creator A5031646626 @default.
• W2937355160 date "2014-01-01" @default.
• W2937355160 modified "2023-09-25" @default.
• W2937355160 title "CULTUROLOGICAL HERMENEUTICS AS THE METHODOLOGICAL BASIS OF STUDYING THE PHENOMENON OF INTERPRETATION" @default.
• W2937355160 hasPublicationYear "2014" @default.
• W2937355160 type Work @default.
• W2937355160 sameAs 2937355160 @default.
• W2937355160 citedByCount "0" @default.
• W2937355160 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2937355160 hasAuthorship W2937355160A5031646626 @default.
• W2937355160 hasConcept C111472728 @default.
• W2937355160 hasConcept C138885662 @default.
• W2937355160 hasConcept C144024400 @default.
• W2937355160 hasConcept C188370112 @default.
• W2937355160 hasConcept C21190884 @default.
• W2937355160 hasConcept C2780876879 @default.
• W2937355160 hasConcept C41895202 @default.
• W2937355160 hasConcept C50335755 @default.
• W2937355160 hasConcept C50379869 @default.
• W2937355160 hasConcept C527412718 @default.
• W2937355160 hasConceptScore W2937355160C111472728 @default.
• W2937355160 hasConceptScore W2937355160C138885662 @default.
• W2937355160 hasConceptScore W2937355160C144024400 @default.
• W2937355160 hasConceptScore W2937355160C188370112 @default.
• W2937355160 hasConceptScore W2937355160C21190884 @default.
• W2937355160 hasConceptScore W2937355160C2780876879 @default.
• W2937355160 hasConceptScore W2937355160C41895202 @default.
• W2937355160 hasConceptScore W2937355160C50335755 @default.
• W2937355160 hasConceptScore W2937355160C50379869 @default.
• W2937355160 hasConceptScore W2937355160C527412718 @default.
• W2937355160 hasIssue "4" @default.
• W2937355160 hasLocation W29373551601 @default.
• W2937355160 hasOpenAccess W2937355160 @default.
• W2937355160 hasPrimaryLocation W29373551601 @default.
• W2937355160 hasRelatedWork W127431391 @default.
• W2937355160 hasRelatedWork W129052737 @default.
• W2937355160 hasRelatedWork W1489704184 @default.
• W2937355160 hasRelatedWork W1544290064 @default.
• W2937355160 hasRelatedWork W159738105 @default.
• W2937355160 hasRelatedWork W186874355 @default.
• W2937355160 hasRelatedWork W1983626042 @default.
• W2937355160 hasRelatedWork W2199519850 @default.
• W2937355160 hasRelatedWork W2286132250 @default.
• W2937355160 hasRelatedWork W2481042685 @default.
• W2937355160 hasRelatedWork W2500991119 @default.
• W2937355160 hasRelatedWork W2898801646 @default.
• W2937355160 hasRelatedWork W2908362287 @default.
• W2937355160 hasRelatedWork W2946608081 @default.
• W2937355160 hasRelatedWork W3107813342 @default.
• W2937355160 hasRelatedWork W3115513944 @default.
• W2937355160 hasRelatedWork W3130288323 @default.
• W2937355160 hasRelatedWork W53839622 @default.
• W2937355160 hasRelatedWork W69721337 @default.
• W2937355160 hasRelatedWork W828717371 @default.
• W2937355160 isParatext "false" @default.
• W2937355160 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W2937355160 magId "2937355160" @default.
• W2937355160 workType "article" @default.