FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2937892822> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2937892822 endingPage "1566" @default.
• W2937892822 startingPage "1566" @default.
• W2937892822 abstract "A warm cup of coffee next to one's laptop, late in the evening. The marked-up draft with treasured comments from a mentor or colleague. The pride that swells when your name—or even better, your resident's name—graces the lead article in this month's JVS. The reasons that surgeons find writing to be rewarding vary broadly. Whether they are in academic practice, community practice, or somewhere in between, nearly every practicing vascular surgeon has likely written a paper at some point. The length and rigor of surgical training nearly guarantee that we all were involved in the development, writing, and publication of a manuscript. Perhaps this was a highly cited paper in a broadly read journal, or perhaps this was a report outlining an interesting case to a local community of physicians. Either way, most vascular surgeons have likely published at one point or another. What is “rewarding” about writing? For many, writing about surgery is a quiet solace and an invaluable way to communicate our interests and findings to our colleagues. In this manuscript, Drs Cheng and colleagues carefully calculated the academic rewards associated with writing and determined how many papers vascular surgeons have published at the assistant professor, associate professor, and professor level.1Cheng T.W. Farber A. Rajani R.R. Jones D.W. Flynn D. Rybin D. et al.National criteria for academic appointment in vascular surgery.J Vasc Surg. 2018; Google Scholar They found that on average, assistant professors had written approximately 15 papers, whereas professors have written nearly 6 times that number. Promotion was heavily associated with academic productivity, and promotion to the highest level was associated with productivity and highly cited publications. Proudly, when the authors compared the academic productivity of vascular surgeons to other surgeons, we rank highly in terms of numbers and impact of our published works. These benchmarks, described in a well-written manuscript and nicely illustrated using scatterplots and correlation coefficients, make an elegant argument about why writing is an important and necessary skill set for the modern vascular surgeon. Writing a manuscript is a slow and sometimes painful process. Disruptive innovation from social media has made this process even more complex. Visual abstracts, tweets, videos, and infographics have shifted the ways by which physicians communicate their findings.2Luc J.G. Stamp N.L. Antonoff M.B. Social media as a means of networking and mentorship: role for women in cardiothoracic surgery.Semin Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2018; 30: 487-495Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (48) Google Scholar, 3Ibrahim A.M. Lillemoe K.D. Klingensmith M.E. Dimick J.B. Visual abstracts to disseminate research on social media: a prospective, case-control crossover study.Ann Surg. 2017; 266: e46-e48Crossref PubMed Scopus (129) Google Scholar, 4Nikolian V.C. Barrett M. Valbuena V.S. Ibrahim A.M. Eidy H. Ghandour M.H. et al.Educational content and the use of social media at US departments of surgery.Surgery. 2018; 163: 467-471Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (15) Google Scholar Promotion criteria may follow this pattern as well. In future years, will our promotion tracks consider how many social media followers we have? Can't I just look at the on-line video of the procedure rather than reading about it? These questions are empirical, and time will tell as future generations continue to revise our measures of success and career maturity. Even with these changes, vascular surgeons aiming to succeed in academic practice can be sure that well-written, thoughtful analyses and clearly displayed findings are a certain recipe for academic success. So, write early and often. Just like in vascular surgery, practice makes perfect. The opinions or views expressed in this commentary are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the opinions or recommendations of the Journal of Vascular Surgery or the Society for Vascular Surgery. National criteria for academic appointment in vascular surgeryJournal of Vascular SurgeryVol. 69Issue 5PreviewAdvancement in academic medicine is multifactorial. Our objectives were to characterize academic appointments in vascular surgery and to investigate what factors, particularly publications, influenced academic appointment. Full-Text PDF Open Archive" @default.
• W2937892822 created "2019-04-25" @default.
• W2937892822 creator A5065001569 @default.
• W2937892822 date "2019-05-01" @default.
• W2937892822 modified "2023-10-18" @default.
• W2937892822 title "Why do we write?" @default.
• W2937892822 cites W2608578840 @default.
• W2937892822 cites W2772873494 @default.
• W2937892822 cites W2883997993 @default.
• W2937892822 doi "https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvs.2018.09.024" @default.
• W2937892822 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/31010520" @default.
• W2937892822 hasPublicationYear "2019" @default.
• W2937892822 type Work @default.
• W2937892822 sameAs 2937892822 @default.
• W2937892822 citedByCount "2" @default.
• W2937892822 countsByYear W29378928222020 @default.
• W2937892822 countsByYear W29378928222021 @default.
• W2937892822 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2937892822 hasAuthorship W2937892822A5065001569 @default.
• W2937892822 hasBestOaLocation W29378928221 @default.
• W2937892822 hasConcept C17744445 @default.
• W2937892822 hasConcept C199539241 @default.
• W2937892822 hasConcept C2524010 @default.
• W2937892822 hasConcept C2777700019 @default.
• W2937892822 hasConcept C2779728303 @default.
• W2937892822 hasConcept C28719098 @default.
• W2937892822 hasConcept C33923547 @default.
• W2937892822 hasConcept C509550671 @default.
• W2937892822 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W2937892822 hasConceptScore W2937892822C17744445 @default.
• W2937892822 hasConceptScore W2937892822C199539241 @default.
• W2937892822 hasConceptScore W2937892822C2524010 @default.
• W2937892822 hasConceptScore W2937892822C2777700019 @default.
• W2937892822 hasConceptScore W2937892822C2779728303 @default.
• W2937892822 hasConceptScore W2937892822C28719098 @default.
• W2937892822 hasConceptScore W2937892822C33923547 @default.
• W2937892822 hasConceptScore W2937892822C509550671 @default.
• W2937892822 hasConceptScore W2937892822C71924100 @default.
• W2937892822 hasIssue "5" @default.
• W2937892822 hasLocation W29378928221 @default.
• W2937892822 hasLocation W29378928222 @default.
• W2937892822 hasOpenAccess W2937892822 @default.
• W2937892822 hasPrimaryLocation W29378928221 @default.
• W2937892822 hasRelatedWork W1503021341 @default.
• W2937892822 hasRelatedWork W18105446 @default.
• W2937892822 hasRelatedWork W2039225189 @default.
• W2937892822 hasRelatedWork W2088064030 @default.
• W2937892822 hasRelatedWork W2120247626 @default.
• W2937892822 hasRelatedWork W2138555778 @default.
• W2937892822 hasRelatedWork W2239017514 @default.
• W2937892822 hasRelatedWork W2613446241 @default.
• W2937892822 hasRelatedWork W2899084033 @default.
• W2937892822 hasRelatedWork W3030310468 @default.
• W2937892822 hasVolume "69" @default.
• W2937892822 isParatext "false" @default.
• W2937892822 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W2937892822 magId "2937892822" @default.
• W2937892822 workType "article" @default.