FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2938394549> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2938394549 endingPage "698" @default.
• W2938394549 startingPage "698" @default.
• W2938394549 abstract "<h3>Importance</h3> The Infectious Diseases Society of America recommends ophthalmologic examinations for everyone with positive<i>Candida</i>blood culture results (candidemia) to screen for endophthalmitis, a practice that remains controversial because of multiple concerns for its limited usefulness and potential for harm. <h3>Objective</h3> To determine guideline efficacy by reconciling discrepancies in the incidence of endophthalmitis and evaluating outcomes of studies assessing ophthalmologic screening for candidemia. <h3>Evidence Review</h3> PubMed literature searches, including the search terms<i>candidemia</i>,<i>fungemia</i>,<i>chorioretinitis</i>, and<i>endophthalmitis</i>, identified longitudinal studies prior to 2018 of patients who underwent ophthalmologic evaluations in the setting of positive fungal blood culture results regardless of symptoms or clinical status. Additional studies not captured by these queries were found by manually scanning references within the articles captured by the queries. Ambiguous studies of patients with concomitant bacterial or viral infections were excluded. <h3>Findings</h3> Thirty-eight applicable studies of 7472 patients who underwent ophthalmologic screening for candidemia or fungemia were identified. Criteria were compared with the conventional definition of endophthalmitis based on present (concordant) or absent (discordant) frank vitreous involvement. Concordant (59 of 6693 [0.9%]) and discordant (114 of 779 [14.6%]) endophthalmitis incidence rates differed by 13.8% (95% CI, 11.4%-16.4%;<i>P</i> < .001). Visual acuity for each case was recorded verbatim as subjective report provided by each study, when available. None of the concordant endophthalmitis cases reported direct, intraocular, microscopic evidence of<i>Candida</i>or other fungal organisms. Outcomes were available for 19 patients with concordant endophthalmitis; 6 died within 4 weeks of screening. The rate of substantial vision loss was associated (φ = 0.58; 95% CI, 0.01-0.86;<i>P</i> = .046) with additional invasive intervention (3 of 6 [50.0%]) compared with medical management alone (0 of 6). <h3>Conclusions and Relevance</h3> In this systematic review without meta-analysis, inconsistent definitions of endophthalmitis accounted for discrepancies of its incidence and overreporting among patients with candidemia, contributing to bias and resulting in the construction of guidelines. As few as 3 of 7472 patients had potential improvement, while routine examination overall could lead to additional interventions and harm in this population. These findings suggest that indiscriminate screening based on candidemia alone does not appear to be supported by the literature and should be reevaluated for inclusion as a recommendation from the Infectious Diseases Society of America." @default.
• W2938394549 created "2019-04-25" @default.
• W2938394549 creator A5002541699 @default.
• W2938394549 creator A5015509300 @default.
• W2938394549 creator A5021008958 @default.
• W2938394549 creator A5032244431 @default.
• W2938394549 creator A5037087387 @default.
• W2938394549 creator A5057797164 @default.
• W2938394549 creator A5065194746 @default.
• W2938394549 creator A5071115321 @default.
• W2938394549 date "2019-06-01" @default.
• W2938394549 modified "2023-10-17" @default.
• W2938394549 title "Utility of Ophthalmologic Screening for Patients With <i>Candida</i> Bloodstream Infections" @default.
• W2938394549 cites W161080413 @default.
• W2938394549 cites W16133478 @default.
• W2938394549 cites W1968176966 @default.
• W2938394549 cites W1972832101 @default.
• W2938394549 cites W1975289458 @default.
• W2938394549 cites W1978629068 @default.
• W2938394549 cites W1987489607 @default.
• W2938394549 cites W1988360777 @default.
• W2938394549 cites W2011156798 @default.
• W2938394549 cites W2012019665 @default.
• W2938394549 cites W2012857279 @default.
• W2938394549 cites W2016896140 @default.
• W2938394549 cites W2019221516 @default.
• W2938394549 cites W2020086365 @default.
• W2938394549 cites W2024155913 @default.
• W2938394549 cites W2028766354 @default.
• W2938394549 cites W2028824335 @default.
• W2938394549 cites W2031172773 @default.
• W2938394549 cites W2033593338 @default.
• W2938394549 cites W2034397389 @default.
• W2938394549 cites W2035684609 @default.
• W2938394549 cites W2038285210 @default.
• W2938394549 cites W2041072626 @default.
• W2938394549 cites W2052566496 @default.
• W2938394549 cites W2057939337 @default.
• W2938394549 cites W2062022402 @default.
• W2938394549 cites W2062329228 @default.
• W2938394549 cites W2065440789 @default.
• W2938394549 cites W2082714722 @default.
• W2938394549 cites W2097911711 @default.
• W2938394549 cites W2100759549 @default.
• W2938394549 cites W2107548644 @default.
• W2938394549 cites W2111240123 @default.
• W2938394549 cites W2119470586 @default.
• W2938394549 cites W2137575148 @default.
• W2938394549 cites W2156713111 @default.
• W2938394549 cites W2157511973 @default.
• W2938394549 cites W2165438455 @default.
• W2938394549 cites W2166719770 @default.
• W2938394549 cites W2179632229 @default.
• W2938394549 cites W2214581196 @default.
• W2938394549 cites W2260819425 @default.
• W2938394549 cites W2340388705 @default.
• W2938394549 cites W2572728523 @default.
• W2938394549 cites W2593979694 @default.
• W2938394549 cites W2605058843 @default.
• W2938394549 cites W2765548161 @default.
• W2938394549 cites W2889197183 @default.
• W2938394549 cites W4249701436 @default.
• W2938394549 doi "https://doi.org/10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2019.0733" @default.
• W2938394549 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/30998819" @default.
• W2938394549 hasPublicationYear "2019" @default.
• W2938394549 type Work @default.
• W2938394549 sameAs 2938394549 @default.
• W2938394549 citedByCount "54" @default.
• W2938394549 countsByYear W29383945492019 @default.
• W2938394549 countsByYear W29383945492020 @default.
• W2938394549 countsByYear W29383945492021 @default.
• W2938394549 countsByYear W29383945492022 @default.
• W2938394549 countsByYear W29383945492023 @default.
• W2938394549 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2938394549 hasAuthorship W2938394549A5002541699 @default.
• W2938394549 hasAuthorship W2938394549A5015509300 @default.
• W2938394549 hasAuthorship W2938394549A5021008958 @default.
• W2938394549 hasAuthorship W2938394549A5032244431 @default.
• W2938394549 hasAuthorship W2938394549A5037087387 @default.
• W2938394549 hasAuthorship W2938394549A5057797164 @default.
• W2938394549 hasAuthorship W2938394549A5065194746 @default.
• W2938394549 hasAuthorship W2938394549A5071115321 @default.
• W2938394549 hasConcept C118487528 @default.
• W2938394549 hasConcept C120665830 @default.
• W2938394549 hasConcept C121332964 @default.
• W2938394549 hasConcept C141071460 @default.
• W2938394549 hasConcept C142724271 @default.
• W2938394549 hasConcept C187212893 @default.
• W2938394549 hasConcept C2777235844 @default.
• W2938394549 hasConcept C2778989668 @default.
• W2938394549 hasConcept C2779473907 @default.
• W2938394549 hasConcept C2780182762 @default.
• W2938394549 hasConcept C2780558435 @default.
• W2938394549 hasConcept C2780908437 @default.
• W2938394549 hasConcept C501593827 @default.
• W2938394549 hasConcept C61511704 @default.
• W2938394549 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W2938394549 hasConcept C86803240 @default.

• next