Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2938640070> ?p ?o ?g. }
Showing items 1 to 63 of
63
with 100 items per page.
- W2938640070 endingPage "674" @default.
- W2938640070 startingPage "673" @default.
- W2938640070 abstract "Free AccessCPAP - BPAP - Positive Airway Pressure - Sleep Medicine PearlsPressure Requirements With a Nasal Versus Oronasal Mask During a PAP Titration Study Hao Cheng, MD, Anita Valanju Shelgikar, MD, MHPE, FAASM Hao Cheng, MD Address correspondence to: Hao Cheng, MD, Miami VA Healthcare System, 1201 NW 16th St, Miami, FL 33125-1693(305) 575-3520(305) 575-3210 E-mail Address: [email protected] Miami VA Healthcare System, Miami, Florida Search for more papers by this author , Anita Valanju Shelgikar, MD, MHPE, FAASM Sleep Disorders Center, Department of Neurology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan Search for more papers by this author Published Online:April 15, 2019https://doi.org/10.5664/jcsm.7742SectionsPDF ShareShare onFacebookTwitterLinkedInRedditEmail ToolsAdd to favoritesDownload CitationsTrack Citations AboutINTRODUCTIONAn 85-year-old male with loud snoring noted during recent hospital admission for altered mental status was referred for a polysomnogram. Past medical history included suspected Alzheimer dementia, headaches, depression, and gastroesophageal reflux disease. Physical examination was notable for a Mallampati class II oral airway with erythematous soft palate and uvula.His baseline polysomnogram showed obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) with an apnea-hypopnea index (AHI) of 37 events/h and minimum oxygen saturation of 78%. He was initially tried on an oronasal mask per patient preference. During continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) titration, obstructive apneas persisted with a CPAP setting of 18 cmH2O. The patient was switched to a nasal mask and bilevel positive airway pressure (BPAP) for comfort. Obstructive apneas were controlled at BPAP 13/7 cmH2O (Figure 1). Supine position and total leak at 38–58 L/min were maintained with CPAP and BPAP settings. CPAP was not retested with the nasal mask. Although there was the concomitant change to BPAP, the nasal mask required significantly lower pressures (expiratory pressure of 7 cmH2O) compared with the oronasal mask (CPAP of 18 cmH2O) for control of obstructive apneas and hypopneas.QUESTION: Why did the oronasal mask have a higher pressure requirement than the nasal mask for effective OSA treatment?Figure 1: Epochs from the patient's study.1-minute epochs from the patient's titration study with continuous positive airway pressure of 14 cmH2O on oronasal mask (left), 18 cmH2O on oronasal mask (middle), and bilevel positive airway pressure of 13/7 cmH2O on nasal mask (right).Download FigureANSWER: It is hypothesized that higher therapeutic pressures are needed due to reduced retropalatal and retroglossal airway openings with oronasal masks. This may result from a difference in the pressure gradients affecting the soft palate with oronasal versus nasal masks and/or the pressure exerted by the oronasal mask on the lower jaw.DISCUSSIONStudies have demonstrated an average of 1–2 cmH2O decrease in pressure requirements or lower residual AHI with a nasal versus oronasal mask.1–4 Most patients breathe through the nose while sleeping,5,6 consistent with findings showing oral airway resistance was more than double the nasal airway resistance during sleep despite oral airway resistance being lower during wakefulness.7 One hypothesis suggests that nasal masks increase the pressure gradient from the nasopharynx to the oral cavity, pushing the soft palate anteriorly. A study in 10 patients with OSA, done during wakefulness, found the amount of retropalatal airway opening was significantly less with oro-nasal compared to nasal mask; mask type did not affect the size of the retroglossal airway.8 Another hypothesis proposes the lower lip of the oronasal mask pushes the lower jaw and tongue posteriorly, increasing the propensity for obstruction. A study of 11 patients with OSA tested a nasal mask against an oronasal mask with and without a mandibular advancement device; oronasal masks required higher pressures than nasal masks but showed partial improvement with addition of an oral appliance.9 Other hypotheses include nasal airflow reflex resulting in increased inspiratory flow rate10 and jaw positioning with oronasal masks affecting obstruction.11SLEEP MEDICINE PEARLSStart initial titration studies with a nasal mask.For patients requiring high pressures with an oronasal mask, consider trying a nasal mask in order to reduce the therapeutic pressure requirement.Oronasal masks are advised for patients with significant nasal airway resistance, mouth venting despite chinstrap, and patients unable to tolerate nasal masks (especially at higher pressures).DISCLOSURE STATEMENTThe authors report no conflicts of interest.CITATIONCheng H, Shelgikar AV. Pressure requirements with a nasal versus oronasal mask during a PAP titration study. J Clin Sleep Med. 2019;15(4):673–674.REFERENCES1 Andrade RG, Piccin VS, Nascimento JA, Viana FM, Genta PR, Lorenzi-Filho GImpact of the type of mask on the effectiveness of and adherence to continuous positive airway pressure treatment for obstructive sleep apneaJ Bras Pneumol2014406658668 CrossrefGoogle Scholar2 Deshpande S, Joosten S, Turton A, et al.Oronasal masks require a higher pressure than nasal and nasal pillow masks for the treatment of obstructive sleep apneaJ Clin Sleep Med201612912631268 LinkGoogle Scholar3 Andrade RGS, Viana FM, Nascimento JA, et al.Nasal vs oronasal CPAP for OSA treatment: a meta-analysisChest20181533665674 CrossrefGoogle Scholar4 Rowland S, Aiyappan V, Hennessy C, et al.Comparing the efficacy, mask leak, patient adherence, and patient preference of three different CPAP interfaces to treat moderate-severe obstructive sleep apneaJ Clin Sleep Med2018141101108 LinkGoogle Scholar5 Prosise GL, Berry RBOral-nasal continuous positive airway pressure as a treatment for obstructive sleep apneaChest19941061180186 CrossrefGoogle Scholar6 Fitzpatrick MF, Driver HS, Chatha N, Voduc N, Girard AMPartitioning of inhaled ventilation between the nasal and oral routes during sleep in normal subjectsJ Appl Physiol2003943883990 CrossrefGoogle Scholar7 Fitzpatrick MF, McLean H, Urton AM, Tan A, O'Donnell D, Driver HSEffect of nasal or oral breathing route on upper airway resistance during sleepEur Respir J2003225827832 CrossrefGoogle Scholar8 Ebben MR, Milrad S, Dyke JP, Phillips CD, Krieger ACComparison of the upper airway dynamics of oronasal and nasal masks with positive airway pressure treatment using cine magnetic resonance imagingSleep Breath20162017985 CrossrefGoogle Scholar9 Kaminska M, Montpetit A, Mathieu A, Jobin V, Morisson F, Mayer PHigher effective oronasal versus nasal continuous positive airway pressure in obstructive sleep apnea: effect of mandibular stabilizationCan Respir J2014214234238 CrossrefGoogle Scholar10 Michels Dde S, Rodrigues Ada M, Nakanishi M, Sampaio AL, Venosa ARNasal involvement in obstructive sleep apnea syndromeInt J Otolaryngol20142014717419 Google Scholar11 Meurice JC, Marc I, Carrier G, Sériès FEffects of mouth opening on upper airway collapsibility in normal sleeping subjectsAm J Respir Crit Care Med19961531255259 CrossrefGoogle Scholar Previous article FiguresReferencesRelatedDetails Volume 15 • Issue 04 • April 15, 2019ISSN (print): 1550-9389ISSN (online): 1550-9397Frequency: Monthly Metrics History Submitted for publicationJuly 30, 2018Submitted in final revised formOctober 29, 2018Accepted for publicationJanuary 15, 2019Published onlineApril 15, 2019 Information© 2019 American Academy of Sleep MedicinePDF download" @default.
- W2938640070 created "2019-04-25" @default.
- W2938640070 creator A5086078104 @default.
- W2938640070 creator A5088986398 @default.
- W2938640070 date "2019-04-15" @default.
- W2938640070 modified "2023-09-26" @default.
- W2938640070 title "Pressure Requirements With a Nasal Versus Oronasal Mask During a PAP Titration Study" @default.
- W2938640070 cites W2009548347 @default.
- W2938640070 cites W2028679873 @default.
- W2938640070 cites W2052268580 @default.
- W2938640070 cites W2061427488 @default.
- W2938640070 cites W2092809686 @default.
- W2938640070 cites W2093297934 @default.
- W2938640070 cites W2151404682 @default.
- W2938640070 cites W2255125876 @default.
- W2938640070 cites W2520064914 @default.
- W2938640070 cites W2782648674 @default.
- W2938640070 cites W2783592750 @default.
- W2938640070 doi "https://doi.org/10.5664/jcsm.7742" @default.
- W2938640070 hasPubMedCentralId "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/6457502" @default.
- W2938640070 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/30952220" @default.
- W2938640070 hasPublicationYear "2019" @default.
- W2938640070 type Work @default.
- W2938640070 sameAs 2938640070 @default.
- W2938640070 citedByCount "0" @default.
- W2938640070 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
- W2938640070 hasAuthorship W2938640070A5086078104 @default.
- W2938640070 hasAuthorship W2938640070A5088986398 @default.
- W2938640070 hasBestOaLocation W29386400701 @default.
- W2938640070 hasConcept C179104552 @default.
- W2938640070 hasConcept C184866935 @default.
- W2938640070 hasConcept C185592680 @default.
- W2938640070 hasConcept C42219234 @default.
- W2938640070 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
- W2938640070 hasConceptScore W2938640070C179104552 @default.
- W2938640070 hasConceptScore W2938640070C184866935 @default.
- W2938640070 hasConceptScore W2938640070C185592680 @default.
- W2938640070 hasConceptScore W2938640070C42219234 @default.
- W2938640070 hasConceptScore W2938640070C71924100 @default.
- W2938640070 hasIssue "04" @default.
- W2938640070 hasLocation W29386400701 @default.
- W2938640070 hasLocation W29386400702 @default.
- W2938640070 hasLocation W29386400703 @default.
- W2938640070 hasLocation W29386400704 @default.
- W2938640070 hasOpenAccess W2938640070 @default.
- W2938640070 hasPrimaryLocation W29386400701 @default.
- W2938640070 hasRelatedWork W1506200166 @default.
- W2938640070 hasRelatedWork W1995515455 @default.
- W2938640070 hasRelatedWork W2039318446 @default.
- W2938640070 hasRelatedWork W2048182022 @default.
- W2938640070 hasRelatedWork W2080531066 @default.
- W2938640070 hasRelatedWork W2170431845 @default.
- W2938640070 hasRelatedWork W2748952813 @default.
- W2938640070 hasRelatedWork W2899084033 @default.
- W2938640070 hasRelatedWork W3032375762 @default.
- W2938640070 hasRelatedWork W3108674512 @default.
- W2938640070 hasVolume "15" @default.
- W2938640070 isParatext "false" @default.
- W2938640070 isRetracted "false" @default.
- W2938640070 magId "2938640070" @default.
- W2938640070 workType "article" @default.