Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2939407652> ?p ?o ?g. }
- W2939407652 endingPage "461.e2" @default.
- W2939407652 startingPage "451" @default.
- W2939407652 abstract "Background & Aims Endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) with submucosal injection is an established method for removing colorectal polyps, although the en bloc resection rate decreases when polyp size exceeds 10 mm. Piecemeal resection increases local recurrence. Underwater EMR (UEMR) is an effective technique for removal of sessile colorectal polyps and we investigated whether it is superior to conventional EMR (CEMR). Methods We conducted a multicenter randomized controlled trial at 5 institutions in Japan. Patients with endoscopically diagnosed, intermediate-size (10–20 mm) sessile colorectal lesions were randomly assigned to undergo UEMR or CEMR. Only the most proximal lesion was registered. The UEMR procedure included immersion of the entire lumen in water and snare resection of the lesion without submucosal injection of normal saline. We analyzed outcomes of 108 colorectal lesions in the UEMR group and 102 lesions in the CEMR group. R0 resection was defined as en bloc resection with a histologically confirmed negative resection margin. The primary endpoint was the difference in the R0 resection rates between groups. Results The proportions of R0 resections were 69% (95% confidence interval [CI] 59%–77%) in the UEMR group vs 50% (95% CI 40%–60%) in the CEMR group (P = .011). The proportions of en bloc resections were 89% (95% CI 81%–94%) in the UEMR group vs 75% (95% CI 65%–83%) in the CEMR group (P = .007). There was no significant difference in median procedure time (165 vs 175 seconds) or proportions of patients with adverse events (2.8% in the UEMR group vs 2.0% in the CEMR group). Conclusions In a multicenter randomized controlled trial, we found that UEMR significantly increased the proportions of R0 resections for 10- to 20-mm sessile colorectal lesions without increasing adverse events or procedure time. Use of this procedure should be encouraged. Trials registry number: UMIN000018989 Endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) with submucosal injection is an established method for removing colorectal polyps, although the en bloc resection rate decreases when polyp size exceeds 10 mm. Piecemeal resection increases local recurrence. Underwater EMR (UEMR) is an effective technique for removal of sessile colorectal polyps and we investigated whether it is superior to conventional EMR (CEMR). We conducted a multicenter randomized controlled trial at 5 institutions in Japan. Patients with endoscopically diagnosed, intermediate-size (10–20 mm) sessile colorectal lesions were randomly assigned to undergo UEMR or CEMR. Only the most proximal lesion was registered. The UEMR procedure included immersion of the entire lumen in water and snare resection of the lesion without submucosal injection of normal saline. We analyzed outcomes of 108 colorectal lesions in the UEMR group and 102 lesions in the CEMR group. R0 resection was defined as en bloc resection with a histologically confirmed negative resection margin. The primary endpoint was the difference in the R0 resection rates between groups. The proportions of R0 resections were 69% (95% confidence interval [CI] 59%–77%) in the UEMR group vs 50% (95% CI 40%–60%) in the CEMR group (P = .011). The proportions of en bloc resections were 89% (95% CI 81%–94%) in the UEMR group vs 75% (95% CI 65%–83%) in the CEMR group (P = .007). There was no significant difference in median procedure time (165 vs 175 seconds) or proportions of patients with adverse events (2.8% in the UEMR group vs 2.0% in the CEMR group). In a multicenter randomized controlled trial, we found that UEMR significantly increased the proportions of R0 resections for 10- to 20-mm sessile colorectal lesions without increasing adverse events or procedure time. Use of this procedure should be encouraged. Trials registry number: UMIN000018989" @default.
- W2939407652 created "2019-04-25" @default.
- W2939407652 creator A5012996351 @default.
- W2939407652 creator A5018790582 @default.
- W2939407652 creator A5025349821 @default.
- W2939407652 creator A5042822303 @default.
- W2939407652 creator A5044388171 @default.
- W2939407652 creator A5047639005 @default.
- W2939407652 creator A5054883907 @default.
- W2939407652 creator A5056198686 @default.
- W2939407652 creator A5065342574 @default.
- W2939407652 creator A5070379583 @default.
- W2939407652 creator A5080550960 @default.
- W2939407652 date "2019-08-01" @default.
- W2939407652 modified "2023-10-18" @default.
- W2939407652 title "Comparison of Underwater vs Conventional Endoscopic Mucosal Resection of Intermediate-Size Colorectal Polyps" @default.
- W2939407652 cites W1251891212 @default.
- W2939407652 cites W1542443907 @default.
- W2939407652 cites W1703572222 @default.
- W2939407652 cites W1969938538 @default.
- W2939407652 cites W1976436673 @default.
- W2939407652 cites W1990423062 @default.
- W2939407652 cites W1996249121 @default.
- W2939407652 cites W2002922633 @default.
- W2939407652 cites W2006101115 @default.
- W2939407652 cites W2006342684 @default.
- W2939407652 cites W2007352645 @default.
- W2939407652 cites W2008147311 @default.
- W2939407652 cites W2008745743 @default.
- W2939407652 cites W2009214403 @default.
- W2939407652 cites W2031445642 @default.
- W2939407652 cites W2038065536 @default.
- W2939407652 cites W2049103906 @default.
- W2939407652 cites W2057660850 @default.
- W2939407652 cites W2069407323 @default.
- W2939407652 cites W2078406545 @default.
- W2939407652 cites W2087165917 @default.
- W2939407652 cites W2093467790 @default.
- W2939407652 cites W2107126815 @default.
- W2939407652 cites W2111480970 @default.
- W2939407652 cites W2119449478 @default.
- W2939407652 cites W2125714070 @default.
- W2939407652 cites W2129232469 @default.
- W2939407652 cites W2130810182 @default.
- W2939407652 cites W2140876736 @default.
- W2939407652 cites W2160711732 @default.
- W2939407652 cites W2163529942 @default.
- W2939407652 cites W2165705070 @default.
- W2939407652 cites W2316163594 @default.
- W2939407652 cites W2321348191 @default.
- W2939407652 cites W2467022164 @default.
- W2939407652 cites W2529021002 @default.
- W2939407652 cites W2533677717 @default.
- W2939407652 cites W2560322684 @default.
- W2939407652 cites W2588045818 @default.
- W2939407652 cites W2588184175 @default.
- W2939407652 cites W2594687441 @default.
- W2939407652 cites W2679906311 @default.
- W2939407652 cites W2760067137 @default.
- W2939407652 cites W2765139263 @default.
- W2939407652 cites W2791251656 @default.
- W2939407652 cites W2802481235 @default.
- W2939407652 cites W2804149060 @default.
- W2939407652 cites W2885136590 @default.
- W2939407652 cites W2888816084 @default.
- W2939407652 cites W2889646458 @default.
- W2939407652 cites W2895255435 @default.
- W2939407652 doi "https://doi.org/10.1053/j.gastro.2019.04.005" @default.
- W2939407652 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/30981791" @default.
- W2939407652 hasPublicationYear "2019" @default.
- W2939407652 type Work @default.
- W2939407652 sameAs 2939407652 @default.
- W2939407652 citedByCount "113" @default.
- W2939407652 countsByYear W29394076522019 @default.
- W2939407652 countsByYear W29394076522020 @default.
- W2939407652 countsByYear W29394076522021 @default.
- W2939407652 countsByYear W29394076522022 @default.
- W2939407652 countsByYear W29394076522023 @default.
- W2939407652 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
- W2939407652 hasAuthorship W2939407652A5012996351 @default.
- W2939407652 hasAuthorship W2939407652A5018790582 @default.
- W2939407652 hasAuthorship W2939407652A5025349821 @default.
- W2939407652 hasAuthorship W2939407652A5042822303 @default.
- W2939407652 hasAuthorship W2939407652A5044388171 @default.
- W2939407652 hasAuthorship W2939407652A5047639005 @default.
- W2939407652 hasAuthorship W2939407652A5054883907 @default.
- W2939407652 hasAuthorship W2939407652A5056198686 @default.
- W2939407652 hasAuthorship W2939407652A5065342574 @default.
- W2939407652 hasAuthorship W2939407652A5070379583 @default.
- W2939407652 hasAuthorship W2939407652A5080550960 @default.
- W2939407652 hasConcept C126322002 @default.
- W2939407652 hasConcept C141071460 @default.
- W2939407652 hasConcept C159110652 @default.
- W2939407652 hasConcept C168563851 @default.
- W2939407652 hasConcept C203092338 @default.
- W2939407652 hasConcept C2778132481 @default.
- W2939407652 hasConcept C2778866283 @default.
- W2939407652 hasConcept C2781156865 @default.