Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2940679924> ?p ?o ?g. }
Showing items 1 to 77 of
77
with 100 items per page.
- W2940679924 abstract "Context: One of the goals of Evidence-Based Software Engineering is to leverage evidence from research to practice. However, some studies suggest this goal has not being fully accomplished. Objective: This paper proposes a strategy to assess how systematic reviews cover practitioners' issues in software engineering. Method: We selected 24 systematic reviews identified by a comprehensive tertiary study. Using search strings of the selected systematic reviews, we queried most relevant practitioners' issues on five active Stack Exchange communities, a professional and high-quality Question & Answer platform. After examining more than 1,800 issues, we investigated how findings of the selected systematic reviews could help to solve (i.e. cover) practitioners' issues. Results: After excluding false positives and duplicates, a total of 424 issues were considered related to the selected systematic reviews. This number corresponds to 1.75% of the 26,687 most relevant issues on the five Stack Exchange communities. Among these 424 issues, systematic reviews can successfully cover 14.1% (60) of them. Based on a qualitative analysis, we identified 45 recurrent issues spread in many software engineering areas. The most demanded topic is related to agile software development, with 15 recurrent issues identified and 127 practitioners' issues as a whole. Conclusions: An overall coverage rate of 14.1% reveals a good opportunity for conducting systematic reviews in software engineering to fill the gap of not covered issues. We also observed practitioners explicitly demanding for scientific empirical evidence, rich in context and oriented to specific target audiences. Finally, we also provided guidelines for researchers who want to conduct systematic reviews more connected with software engineering practice." @default.
- W2940679924 created "2019-05-03" @default.
- W2940679924 creator A5001532411 @default.
- W2940679924 creator A5016491466 @default.
- W2940679924 creator A5016508154 @default.
- W2940679924 creator A5044929087 @default.
- W2940679924 creator A5061460618 @default.
- W2940679924 creator A5083215411 @default.
- W2940679924 date "2019-03-22" @default.
- W2940679924 modified "2023-09-26" @default.
- W2940679924 title "How systematic reviews cover practitioners' issues: A study on Stack Exchange communities" @default.
- W2940679924 doi "https://doi.org/10.7287/peerj.preprints.27610v1" @default.
- W2940679924 hasPublicationYear "2019" @default.
- W2940679924 type Work @default.
- W2940679924 sameAs 2940679924 @default.
- W2940679924 citedByCount "0" @default.
- W2940679924 crossrefType "posted-content" @default.
- W2940679924 hasAuthorship W2940679924A5001532411 @default.
- W2940679924 hasAuthorship W2940679924A5016491466 @default.
- W2940679924 hasAuthorship W2940679924A5016508154 @default.
- W2940679924 hasAuthorship W2940679924A5044929087 @default.
- W2940679924 hasAuthorship W2940679924A5061460618 @default.
- W2940679924 hasAuthorship W2940679924A5083215411 @default.
- W2940679924 hasBestOaLocation W29406799241 @default.
- W2940679924 hasConcept C107826830 @default.
- W2940679924 hasConcept C127413603 @default.
- W2940679924 hasConcept C17744445 @default.
- W2940679924 hasConcept C189708586 @default.
- W2940679924 hasConcept C199360897 @default.
- W2940679924 hasConcept C199539241 @default.
- W2940679924 hasConcept C205649164 @default.
- W2940679924 hasConcept C2779473830 @default.
- W2940679924 hasConcept C2780428219 @default.
- W2940679924 hasConcept C39432304 @default.
- W2940679924 hasConcept C41008148 @default.
- W2940679924 hasConcept C78519656 @default.
- W2940679924 hasConcept C9395851 @default.
- W2940679924 hasConceptScore W2940679924C107826830 @default.
- W2940679924 hasConceptScore W2940679924C127413603 @default.
- W2940679924 hasConceptScore W2940679924C17744445 @default.
- W2940679924 hasConceptScore W2940679924C189708586 @default.
- W2940679924 hasConceptScore W2940679924C199360897 @default.
- W2940679924 hasConceptScore W2940679924C199539241 @default.
- W2940679924 hasConceptScore W2940679924C205649164 @default.
- W2940679924 hasConceptScore W2940679924C2779473830 @default.
- W2940679924 hasConceptScore W2940679924C2780428219 @default.
- W2940679924 hasConceptScore W2940679924C39432304 @default.
- W2940679924 hasConceptScore W2940679924C41008148 @default.
- W2940679924 hasConceptScore W2940679924C78519656 @default.
- W2940679924 hasConceptScore W2940679924C9395851 @default.
- W2940679924 hasLocation W29406799241 @default.
- W2940679924 hasOpenAccess W2940679924 @default.
- W2940679924 hasPrimaryLocation W29406799241 @default.
- W2940679924 hasRelatedWork W1964033423 @default.
- W2940679924 hasRelatedWork W2007087314 @default.
- W2940679924 hasRelatedWork W2023931471 @default.
- W2940679924 hasRelatedWork W2054205434 @default.
- W2940679924 hasRelatedWork W2058303331 @default.
- W2940679924 hasRelatedWork W2103458796 @default.
- W2940679924 hasRelatedWork W2105246013 @default.
- W2940679924 hasRelatedWork W2122417229 @default.
- W2940679924 hasRelatedWork W2163146428 @default.
- W2940679924 hasRelatedWork W2293655755 @default.
- W2940679924 hasRelatedWork W2301050748 @default.
- W2940679924 hasRelatedWork W2402958758 @default.
- W2940679924 hasRelatedWork W2497720745 @default.
- W2940679924 hasRelatedWork W2576907567 @default.
- W2940679924 hasRelatedWork W2612764117 @default.
- W2940679924 hasRelatedWork W2794350945 @default.
- W2940679924 hasRelatedWork W3012848202 @default.
- W2940679924 hasRelatedWork W3018124543 @default.
- W2940679924 hasRelatedWork W3127304181 @default.
- W2940679924 hasRelatedWork W589339168 @default.
- W2940679924 isParatext "false" @default.
- W2940679924 isRetracted "false" @default.
- W2940679924 magId "2940679924" @default.
- W2940679924 workType "article" @default.