FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W294098052> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W294098052 endingPage "106" @default.
• W294098052 startingPage "95" @default.
• W294098052 abstract "ABSTRACTThis study looked at the effect of both quantity and quality of computer use on achievement. The Program for International Student Assessment (PISA) 2003 student survey comprising of 4,356 students (boys, n = 2,129; girls, n = 2,227) was used to predict academic achievement from quantity and quality of computer use while controlling for demographic differences such as gender, race, and socioeconomic status. A weighted ordinary least squares hierarchical multiple regression approach was utilized. Both the quantity and quality of computer usage were found to be significant predictors of achievement. Implications were discussed. This study differs from past research in that it investigates the simultaneous effect of both quality and quantity of computer use on academic achievement in context of a large-scale probability sample which allows projection of our analytical results to the entire population of 15-year old high school students in the U.S.Keywords: Information communication technology; ICT; Program for International Student Assessment; PISA; computer use; academic achievementINTRODUCTIONStudies looking at the impact of information communication technology (ICT) tools, such as use of computers, on achievement have shown that not only the quantity but also the quality of such use is important (Lei & Zhao, 2007). Quantity or frequency of use is akin to more practice. The more experience one has with an ICT tool, the shorter is the time required to accomplish repeated tasks and the lower is the probability of making mistakes (Carrasco & Torrecilla, 2012; Henderson, Klemes, & Eshet, 2000; Lahtinen, 2012). The quality of technology use can be thought of as how and why that technology is used (Lie & Zhao, 2007). Although both computer use by teachers (computer assisted instruction [CAI]) and computer use by students have been shown to have a direct and generally positive effect on academic achievement, this study focuses on the latter use. For examples of research that evaluates the effect of CAI on academic achievement we refer the interested reader to applied studies such as Chandra and Lloyd (2008), Kulkarni (2013), and Park, Khan and Petrina (2009).With the widespread availability and use of personal microcomputers at homes and schools, a large body of literature has emerged during the last two decades suggesting that computer use can have a positive effect on academic achievement. In this respect academic achievement is usually understood to mean performance on both standardized and non-standardized assessments (such as grade point average [GPA]) in general areas of literacy such as reading, science, and mathematics (House, 2010; Junco, 2012; Wiebe & Martin, 1994; Wit, Heerwegh, & Verhoeven, 2012). Prior research has suggested that technology can be used in a number of ways but not all of those ways contribute to academic achievement. For instance, while using the internet as a homework support medium is expected to raise achievement, spending time playing non-educational computer games is likely to have no effect or perhaps even a negative effect on achievement as it distracts students from learning. The effect of educational games is not similar for all domains of the curriculum. For example, Kebritchi (2008) found that integration of educational games in the curriculum had a positive effect on achievement in mathematics while Wiebe and Martin (1994) found that such integration had no effect on achievement in geography. Thus, the effect of I CT tasks on achievement depends not only on the frequency with which those tasks are performed, but also on how such tasks are defined. A broad classification separates ICT use into two distinct categories: entertainment/non-educational related routine usage versus specific educational usage. Thus, the use of computer to chat with friends or family would fall under the former category while using a spreadsheet as a support tool to help with a specific homework problem would fall in the latter. …" @default.
• W294098052 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W294098052 creator A5011877804 @default.
• W294098052 creator A5024005750 @default.
• W294098052 date "2013-08-28" @default.
• W294098052 modified "2023-09-26" @default.
• W294098052 title "Quantity and Quality of Computer Use and Academic Achievement: Evidence from a Large-Scale International Test Program" @default.
• W294098052 cites W1488463210 @default.
• W294098052 cites W1556228350 @default.
• W294098052 cites W1972726473 @default.
• W294098052 cites W1978554669 @default.
• W294098052 cites W1978580090 @default.
• W294098052 cites W2008576348 @default.
• W294098052 cites W2016366871 @default.
• W294098052 cites W2102267189 @default.
• W294098052 cites W2113953515 @default.
• W294098052 cites W2119951468 @default.
• W294098052 cites W2145328707 @default.
• W294098052 cites W2168274851 @default.
• W294098052 cites W2905600374 @default.
• W294098052 cites W321419491 @default.
• W294098052 cites W2886737210 @default.
• W294098052 hasPublicationYear "2013" @default.
• W294098052 type Work @default.
• W294098052 sameAs 294098052 @default.
• W294098052 citedByCount "7" @default.
• W294098052 countsByYear W2940980522013 @default.
• W294098052 countsByYear W2940980522015 @default.
• W294098052 countsByYear W2940980522016 @default.
• W294098052 countsByYear W2940980522017 @default.
• W294098052 countsByYear W2940980522021 @default.
• W294098052 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W294098052 hasAuthorship W294098052A5011877804 @default.
• W294098052 hasAuthorship W294098052A5024005750 @default.
• W294098052 hasConcept C105795698 @default.
• W294098052 hasConcept C111472728 @default.
• W294098052 hasConcept C121332964 @default.
• W294098052 hasConcept C136764020 @default.
• W294098052 hasConcept C138885662 @default.
• W294098052 hasConcept C144024400 @default.
• W294098052 hasConcept C145420912 @default.
• W294098052 hasConcept C147077947 @default.
• W294098052 hasConcept C149923435 @default.
• W294098052 hasConcept C151730666 @default.
• W294098052 hasConcept C15744967 @default.
• W294098052 hasConcept C203151758 @default.
• W294098052 hasConcept C2777267654 @default.
• W294098052 hasConcept C2778755073 @default.
• W294098052 hasConcept C2779343474 @default.
• W294098052 hasConcept C2779530757 @default.
• W294098052 hasConcept C2781206393 @default.
• W294098052 hasConcept C2908647359 @default.
• W294098052 hasConcept C33923547 @default.
• W294098052 hasConcept C41008148 @default.
• W294098052 hasConcept C62520636 @default.
• W294098052 hasConcept C67363961 @default.
• W294098052 hasConcept C81369262 @default.
• W294098052 hasConcept C86803240 @default.
• W294098052 hasConcept C99656134 @default.
• W294098052 hasConceptScore W294098052C105795698 @default.
• W294098052 hasConceptScore W294098052C111472728 @default.
• W294098052 hasConceptScore W294098052C121332964 @default.
• W294098052 hasConceptScore W294098052C136764020 @default.
• W294098052 hasConceptScore W294098052C138885662 @default.
• W294098052 hasConceptScore W294098052C144024400 @default.
• W294098052 hasConceptScore W294098052C145420912 @default.
• W294098052 hasConceptScore W294098052C147077947 @default.
• W294098052 hasConceptScore W294098052C149923435 @default.
• W294098052 hasConceptScore W294098052C151730666 @default.
• W294098052 hasConceptScore W294098052C15744967 @default.
• W294098052 hasConceptScore W294098052C203151758 @default.
• W294098052 hasConceptScore W294098052C2777267654 @default.
• W294098052 hasConceptScore W294098052C2778755073 @default.
• W294098052 hasConceptScore W294098052C2779343474 @default.
• W294098052 hasConceptScore W294098052C2779530757 @default.
• W294098052 hasConceptScore W294098052C2781206393 @default.
• W294098052 hasConceptScore W294098052C2908647359 @default.
• W294098052 hasConceptScore W294098052C33923547 @default.
• W294098052 hasConceptScore W294098052C41008148 @default.
• W294098052 hasConceptScore W294098052C62520636 @default.
• W294098052 hasConceptScore W294098052C67363961 @default.
• W294098052 hasConceptScore W294098052C81369262 @default.
• W294098052 hasConceptScore W294098052C86803240 @default.
• W294098052 hasConceptScore W294098052C99656134 @default.
• W294098052 hasIssue "2" @default.
• W294098052 hasLocation W2940980521 @default.
• W294098052 hasOpenAccess W294098052 @default.
• W294098052 hasPrimaryLocation W2940980521 @default.
• W294098052 hasRelatedWork W1490954600 @default.
• W294098052 hasRelatedWork W1502927000 @default.
• W294098052 hasRelatedWork W1595300061 @default.
• W294098052 hasRelatedWork W1608741639 @default.
• W294098052 hasRelatedWork W1957477052 @default.
• W294098052 hasRelatedWork W2014613784 @default.
• W294098052 hasRelatedWork W2056743709 @default.
• W294098052 hasRelatedWork W2065766942 @default.
• W294098052 hasRelatedWork W2069156356 @default.
• W294098052 hasRelatedWork W2096850956 @default.

• next