FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2941014732> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2941014732 endingPage "98" @default.
• W2941014732 startingPage "93" @default.
• W2941014732 abstract "BackgroundDespite significant benefits, many orthopedic surgeons are hesitant to incorporate diagnostic ultrasound into their practice. This may be because of a lack of comfort, knowledge, and/or training. The purpose of this study was to analyze practice patterns regarding the use of shoulder ultrasound by orthopedic surgeons to diagnose rotator cuff tears.Materials and methodsWe conducted a survey of the members of the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) regarding their use of ultrasound. A systematic review of the literature on the use of ultrasound in the shoulder by orthopedic surgeons was also performed.ResultsOf the members of ASES responding to the survey, 55% are using ultrasound for diagnostic purposes in the shoulder. The leading reason for not using ultrasound as the sole imaging modality prior to performing rotator cuff repair was lack of confidence in the ability to determine the reparability of the tear (83%). Our systematic review showed that for an orthopedic surgeon diagnosing a full-thickness rotator cuff tear, the mean sensitivity was 92% and mean specificity was 89%.ConclusionsMany ASES surgeons are not using ultrasound in the shoulder despite its many potential benefits over magnetic resonance imaging. This is because of a lack of confidence in the ability to quantify fatty infiltration, muscle atrophy, and the level of retraction medial to the acromion. Our systematic review showed that orthopedic surgeons can be accurate in the diagnosis of full-thickness rotator cuff tears. Future research should focus on defining parameters of shoulder ultrasound associated with rotator cuff tendon reparability. Educating surgeons on ultrasound technique, cost, and evidence may be a promising strategy to enhance the value in musculoskeletal care delivery. Despite significant benefits, many orthopedic surgeons are hesitant to incorporate diagnostic ultrasound into their practice. This may be because of a lack of comfort, knowledge, and/or training. The purpose of this study was to analyze practice patterns regarding the use of shoulder ultrasound by orthopedic surgeons to diagnose rotator cuff tears. We conducted a survey of the members of the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) regarding their use of ultrasound. A systematic review of the literature on the use of ultrasound in the shoulder by orthopedic surgeons was also performed. Of the members of ASES responding to the survey, 55% are using ultrasound for diagnostic purposes in the shoulder. The leading reason for not using ultrasound as the sole imaging modality prior to performing rotator cuff repair was lack of confidence in the ability to determine the reparability of the tear (83%). Our systematic review showed that for an orthopedic surgeon diagnosing a full-thickness rotator cuff tear, the mean sensitivity was 92% and mean specificity was 89%. Many ASES surgeons are not using ultrasound in the shoulder despite its many potential benefits over magnetic resonance imaging. This is because of a lack of confidence in the ability to quantify fatty infiltration, muscle atrophy, and the level of retraction medial to the acromion. Our systematic review showed that orthopedic surgeons can be accurate in the diagnosis of full-thickness rotator cuff tears. Future research should focus on defining parameters of shoulder ultrasound associated with rotator cuff tendon reparability. Educating surgeons on ultrasound technique, cost, and evidence may be a promising strategy to enhance the value in musculoskeletal care delivery." @default.
• W2941014732 created "2019-05-03" @default.
• W2941014732 creator A5002763445 @default.
• W2941014732 creator A5038563970 @default.
• W2941014732 creator A5055615589 @default.
• W2941014732 creator A5072842781 @default.
• W2941014732 date "2019-07-01" @default.
• W2941014732 modified "2023-10-03" @default.
• W2941014732 title "Do we really need to order magnetic resonance imaging? Shoulder surgeon ultrasound practice patterns and beliefs" @default.
• W2941014732 cites W1545594038 @default.
• W2941014732 cites W1590625029 @default.
• W2941014732 cites W1991995185 @default.
• W2941014732 cites W2001233853 @default.
• W2941014732 cites W2003624356 @default.
• W2941014732 cites W2005393245 @default.
• W2941014732 cites W2007308920 @default.
• W2941014732 cites W2011738477 @default.
• W2941014732 cites W2012190549 @default.
• W2941014732 cites W2012663960 @default.
• W2941014732 cites W2014706815 @default.
• W2941014732 cites W2016890872 @default.
• W2941014732 cites W2024891282 @default.
• W2941014732 cites W2051672153 @default.
• W2941014732 cites W2066438333 @default.
• W2941014732 cites W2076462921 @default.
• W2941014732 cites W2079996817 @default.
• W2941014732 cites W2086905139 @default.
• W2941014732 cites W2090719465 @default.
• W2941014732 cites W2093274439 @default.
• W2941014732 cites W2097109903 @default.
• W2941014732 cites W2111348592 @default.
• W2941014732 cites W2123837105 @default.
• W2941014732 cites W2125208126 @default.
• W2941014732 cites W2135716271 @default.
• W2941014732 cites W2135739558 @default.
• W2941014732 cites W2138374153 @default.
• W2941014732 cites W2143951763 @default.
• W2941014732 cites W2145896612 @default.
• W2941014732 cites W2147669804 @default.
• W2941014732 cites W2172093222 @default.
• W2941014732 cites W2186132366 @default.
• W2941014732 cites W2228849844 @default.
• W2941014732 cites W2465423919 @default.
• W2941014732 cites W2527730587 @default.
• W2941014732 cites W2758089055 @default.
• W2941014732 cites W2796045031 @default.
• W2941014732 cites W4297832561 @default.
• W2941014732 doi "https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jses.2019.01.004" @default.
• W2941014732 hasPubMedCentralId "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/6620198" @default.
• W2941014732 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/31334435" @default.
• W2941014732 hasPublicationYear "2019" @default.
• W2941014732 type Work @default.
• W2941014732 sameAs 2941014732 @default.
• W2941014732 citedByCount "8" @default.
• W2941014732 countsByYear W29410147322019 @default.
• W2941014732 countsByYear W29410147322021 @default.
• W2941014732 countsByYear W29410147322022 @default.
• W2941014732 countsByYear W29410147322023 @default.
• W2941014732 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2941014732 hasAuthorship W2941014732A5002763445 @default.
• W2941014732 hasAuthorship W2941014732A5038563970 @default.
• W2941014732 hasAuthorship W2941014732A5055615589 @default.
• W2941014732 hasAuthorship W2941014732A5072842781 @default.
• W2941014732 hasBestOaLocation W29410147321 @default.
• W2941014732 hasConcept C126838900 @default.
• W2941014732 hasConcept C141071460 @default.
• W2941014732 hasConcept C143409427 @default.
• W2941014732 hasConcept C143753070 @default.
• W2941014732 hasConcept C1862650 @default.
• W2941014732 hasConcept C2775885956 @default.
• W2941014732 hasConcept C2776511800 @default.
• W2941014732 hasConcept C2778275304 @default.
• W2941014732 hasConcept C43893838 @default.
• W2941014732 hasConcept C68312169 @default.
• W2941014732 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W2941014732 hasConceptScore W2941014732C126838900 @default.
• W2941014732 hasConceptScore W2941014732C141071460 @default.
• W2941014732 hasConceptScore W2941014732C143409427 @default.
• W2941014732 hasConceptScore W2941014732C143753070 @default.
• W2941014732 hasConceptScore W2941014732C1862650 @default.
• W2941014732 hasConceptScore W2941014732C2775885956 @default.
• W2941014732 hasConceptScore W2941014732C2776511800 @default.
• W2941014732 hasConceptScore W2941014732C2778275304 @default.
• W2941014732 hasConceptScore W2941014732C43893838 @default.
• W2941014732 hasConceptScore W2941014732C68312169 @default.
• W2941014732 hasConceptScore W2941014732C71924100 @default.
• W2941014732 hasIssue "2" @default.
• W2941014732 hasLocation W29410147321 @default.
• W2941014732 hasLocation W29410147322 @default.
• W2941014732 hasLocation W29410147323 @default.
• W2941014732 hasLocation W29410147324 @default.
• W2941014732 hasOpenAccess W2941014732 @default.
• W2941014732 hasPrimaryLocation W29410147321 @default.
• W2941014732 hasRelatedWork W1984825655 @default.
• W2941014732 hasRelatedWork W2014706815 @default.
• W2941014732 hasRelatedWork W2051672153 @default.
• W2941014732 hasRelatedWork W2076599704 @default.
• W2941014732 hasRelatedWork W2397287555 @default.

• next