FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2941567468> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2941567468 abstract "You have accessJournal of UrologyStone Disease: Surgical Therapy V (PD59)1 Apr 2019PD59-04 EMERGENCY VERSUS ELECTIVE URETEROSCOPY: RETROSPECTIVE ANALYSIS OF 4 021 CASES Vigen Malkhasyan*, George Kasyan, Malika Dzhuraeva, Igor Semenyakin, Dmitriy Pushkar, and Vadim Ivanov Vigen Malkhasyan*Vigen Malkhasyan* More articles by this author , George KasyanGeorge Kasyan More articles by this author , Malika DzhuraevaMalika Dzhuraeva More articles by this author , Igor SemenyakinIgor Semenyakin More articles by this author , Dmitriy PushkarDmitriy Pushkar More articles by this author , and Vadim IvanovVadim Ivanov More articles by this author View All Author Informationhttps://doi.org/10.1097/01.JU.0000557234.60751.1dAboutPDF ToolsAdd to favoritesDownload CitationsTrack CitationsPermissionsReprints ShareFacebookLinked InTwitterEmail Abstract INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES: Renal colic caused by urinary stones is one of the most common emergencies in urology. During the last few decades, the number of patient admissions with renal colic has grown dramatically. The first line of therapy for patients with renal colic is appropriate pain relief. If pain management cannot be achieved through medication, decompression of the renal collecting system using percutaneous nephrostomy or a ureteric stent is indicated [1]. In this case, emergency ureteroscopy and shock wave lithotripsy (SWL) might be a feasible option for patients because it allows for proper analgesia and renders the patient stone free. There is a growing number of publications in the literature outlining the safety and efficacy of emergency ureteroscopy. However, it is still unclear which cases require the use of emergency ureteroscopy. In this study, we report our experience with emergency ureteroscopy compared to elective surgery in patients with renal colic. METHODS: We performed a retrospective analysis of 4021 records of renal colic patients admitted into our clinic who subsequently underwent ureteroscopy from 2001 to 2014. Patients were divided into 2 groups. Group A was composed of 838 (20.5%) patients who underwent ureteroscopy in the first 24 hours after admission (the emergency ureteroscopy group). The second group was composed of 3193 (79.5%) patients who underwent ureteroscopy electively after readmission (group B, or the elective ureteroscopy group). RESULTS: Median stone size did not differ significantly between groups (7.79±2.88 mm vs 7.71±2.92) (p=0.03). No statistically significant differences in efficacy or complication rates were identified between the two groups. Stone fragmentation and relief of obstruction was observed in 740 (88.3%) cases in group A and in 2943 (89.0%) patients in group B (p=0.58). Ureteroscopy failed in 3.3% of the cases in group A and 4.9% of cases in group B. Proximal migration of the stone was observed in 32 (4,3%) patients in group A and 89 (3,02%) patients in group B. The overall complication rates were 7.3% and 7.7% in the emergency ureteroscopy and elective ureteroscopy groups, respectively (p=0.976). Ureteric stenting was more common in the emergency ureteroscopy group (79.9% vs 73.5%, p < 0.001). The median hospital stay was shorter in the emergency ureteroscopy group than in the elective group (5 vs 7 days, p < 0,001). Grade 2-3 ureteral wall injury was observed in 0.5% of patients in group A and in 0.4% of patients in group B. Both groups had a 0.1% rate of avulsion of the ureter. Postoperative fever was observed in 6.4% of patients in group A and in 7.2% of patients in group B. CONCLUSIONS: Emergency ureteroscopy is an efficient and safe option for patients with renal colic. The method provides appropriate pain relief and renders the patient stone free. Nevertheless, further randomized studies are needed to recommend this method as a standard of care. Source of Funding: none Moscow, Russian Federation© 2019 by American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc.FiguresReferencesRelatedDetails Volume 201Issue Supplement 4April 2019Page: e1092-e1092 Advertisement Copyright & Permissions© 2019 by American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc.MetricsAuthor Information Vigen Malkhasyan* More articles by this author George Kasyan More articles by this author Malika Dzhuraeva More articles by this author Igor Semenyakin More articles by this author Dmitriy Pushkar More articles by this author Vadim Ivanov More articles by this author Expand All Advertisement PDF downloadLoading ..." @default.
• W2941567468 created "2019-05-03" @default.
• W2941567468 creator A5012597771 @default.
• W2941567468 creator A5013168754 @default.
• W2941567468 creator A5037946985 @default.
• W2941567468 creator A5060913778 @default.
• W2941567468 creator A5061644336 @default.
• W2941567468 creator A5079442612 @default.
• W2941567468 date "2019-04-01" @default.
• W2941567468 modified "2023-09-23" @default.
• W2941567468 title "PD59-04 EMERGENCY VERSUS ELECTIVE URETEROSCOPY: RETROSPECTIVE ANALYSIS OF 4 021 CASES" @default.
• W2941567468 doi "https://doi.org/10.1097/01.ju.0000557234.60751.1d" @default.
• W2941567468 hasPublicationYear "2019" @default.
• W2941567468 type Work @default.
• W2941567468 sameAs 2941567468 @default.
• W2941567468 citedByCount "0" @default.
• W2941567468 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2941567468 hasAuthorship W2941567468A5012597771 @default.
• W2941567468 hasAuthorship W2941567468A5013168754 @default.
• W2941567468 hasAuthorship W2941567468A5037946985 @default.
• W2941567468 hasAuthorship W2941567468A5060913778 @default.
• W2941567468 hasAuthorship W2941567468A5061644336 @default.
• W2941567468 hasAuthorship W2941567468A5079442612 @default.
• W2941567468 hasBestOaLocation W29415674681 @default.
• W2941567468 hasConcept C141071460 @default.
• W2941567468 hasConcept C142724271 @default.
• W2941567468 hasConcept C204787440 @default.
• W2941567468 hasConcept C2776664737 @default.
• W2941567468 hasConcept C2779675326 @default.
• W2941567468 hasConcept C2780653459 @default.
• W2941567468 hasConcept C2780813298 @default.
• W2941567468 hasConcept C2780885103 @default.
• W2941567468 hasConcept C61434518 @default.
• W2941567468 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W2941567468 hasConceptScore W2941567468C141071460 @default.
• W2941567468 hasConceptScore W2941567468C142724271 @default.
• W2941567468 hasConceptScore W2941567468C204787440 @default.
• W2941567468 hasConceptScore W2941567468C2776664737 @default.
• W2941567468 hasConceptScore W2941567468C2779675326 @default.
• W2941567468 hasConceptScore W2941567468C2780653459 @default.
• W2941567468 hasConceptScore W2941567468C2780813298 @default.
• W2941567468 hasConceptScore W2941567468C2780885103 @default.
• W2941567468 hasConceptScore W2941567468C61434518 @default.
• W2941567468 hasConceptScore W2941567468C71924100 @default.
• W2941567468 hasIssue "Supplement 4" @default.
• W2941567468 hasLocation W29415674681 @default.
• W2941567468 hasOpenAccess W2941567468 @default.
• W2941567468 hasPrimaryLocation W29415674681 @default.
• W2941567468 hasRelatedWork W1972987290 @default.
• W2941567468 hasRelatedWork W2053659464 @default.
• W2941567468 hasRelatedWork W2056942626 @default.
• W2941567468 hasRelatedWork W2097432729 @default.
• W2941567468 hasRelatedWork W2358002439 @default.
• W2941567468 hasRelatedWork W2368024737 @default.
• W2941567468 hasRelatedWork W2384318289 @default.
• W2941567468 hasRelatedWork W2977919527 @default.
• W2941567468 hasRelatedWork W3032124713 @default.
• W2941567468 hasRelatedWork W4280649273 @default.
• W2941567468 hasVolume "201" @default.
• W2941567468 isParatext "false" @default.
• W2941567468 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W2941567468 magId "2941567468" @default.
• W2941567468 workType "article" @default.