FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2942131290> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2942131290 endingPage "111" @default.
• W2942131290 startingPage "111" @default.
• W2942131290 abstract "General anesthesia administration involves laryngoscopy and endotracheal intubation which are associated with the pressor response and can lead to tachycardia, hypertension, and arrhythmias, which can be deleterious in compromised patients and hence, this response needs to be suppressed.The aim of the study is to compare the effectiveness of intravenous (i.v) fentanyl and nalbuphine on the suppression of hemodynamic response in patients undergoing surgery under general anesthesia.This prospective comparative study was conducted in the department of anesthesiology of a tertiary care center, and patients posted for elective surgery under general anesthesia were included.A total of 100 patients of either sex in the age group of 20-50 years, belonging to the American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status classes I and II undergoing surgery under general anesthesia, were divided into two groups: Group N (n = 50) - who received injection nalbuphine 0.2 mg/kg diluted in 10 mL normal saline i.v and Group F (n = 50) - who received injection fentanyl 2 μg/kg diluted in 10 mL of normal saline i.v over 1 min, 5 min prior to intubation. Technique of anesthesia was standardized for all the patients in the study. Heart rate (HR), blood pressure (systolic, diastolic, and mean arterial pressure [SBP, DBP, and MAP]), and oxygen saturation were recorded at baseline, induction, and at 1, 3, 5, and 10 min after intubation.Descriptive statistics were done using mean with standard deviation for quantitative variables, and categorical variables were presented in frequencies along with respective percentages. The statistical comparisons for quantitative variables were done using Student's t-test and for categorical variables, Chi-square was used according to the data. All statistical analyses were performed using SPSS software (Version 22, SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA). All analyses were two tailed, and results were discussed on 5% level of significance, i.e., P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.The demographic characteristics were comparable in both groups. HR was statistically insignificant between the two groups at all intervals. Comparing SBP, DBP, and MAP between the two groups, there was a significant increase in nalbuphine group than fentanyl group postintubation and was statistically significant at all intervals of time. Maximum rise in SBP, DBP, and MAP was 5.49%, 6.03%, and 5.80% for fentanyl group and 12.88%, 9.37%, and 10.86% for nalbuphine group, respectively. Comparison of oxygen saturation in two groups was statistically insignificant.Fentanyl is better than nalbuphine in blunting the pressor response of laryngoscopy and endotracheal intubation." @default.
• W2942131290 created "2019-05-03" @default.
• W2942131290 creator A5011857044 @default.
• W2942131290 creator A5045943273 @default.
• W2942131290 creator A5058762658 @default.
• W2942131290 creator A5059120210 @default.
• W2942131290 creator A5083671931 @default.
• W2942131290 date "2019-01-01" @default.
• W2942131290 modified "2023-09-28" @default.
• W2942131290 title "Evaluation and comparison of fentanyl versus nalbuphine for attenuation of hemodynamic response to laryngoscopy and endotracheal intubation in general anesthesia" @default.
• W2942131290 cites W1796231401 @default.
• W2942131290 cites W1907065087 @default.
• W2942131290 cites W1932669501 @default.
• W2942131290 cites W197769510 @default.
• W2942131290 cites W2003696966 @default.
• W2942131290 cites W2004631881 @default.
• W2942131290 cites W2008329099 @default.
• W2942131290 cites W2034092183 @default.
• W2942131290 cites W2039232502 @default.
• W2942131290 cites W2064782835 @default.
• W2942131290 cites W2068351024 @default.
• W2942131290 cites W2069726169 @default.
• W2942131290 cites W2085118770 @default.
• W2942131290 cites W2085594371 @default.
• W2942131290 cites W2093903749 @default.
• W2942131290 cites W2094503842 @default.
• W2942131290 cites W2153376384 @default.
• W2942131290 cites W2415042626 @default.
• W2942131290 cites W2462681278 @default.
• W2942131290 cites W2475509861 @default.
• W2942131290 doi "https://doi.org/10.4103/aer.aer_16_19" @default.
• W2942131290 hasPubMedCentralId "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/6444961" @default.
• W2942131290 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/31031490" @default.
• W2942131290 hasPublicationYear "2019" @default.
• W2942131290 type Work @default.
• W2942131290 sameAs 2942131290 @default.
• W2942131290 citedByCount "4" @default.
• W2942131290 countsByYear W29421312902020 @default.
• W2942131290 countsByYear W29421312902021 @default.
• W2942131290 countsByYear W29421312902022 @default.
• W2942131290 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2942131290 hasAuthorship W2942131290A5011857044 @default.
• W2942131290 hasAuthorship W2942131290A5045943273 @default.
• W2942131290 hasAuthorship W2942131290A5058762658 @default.
• W2942131290 hasAuthorship W2942131290A5059120210 @default.
• W2942131290 hasAuthorship W2942131290A5083671931 @default.
• W2942131290 hasBestOaLocation W29421312902 @default.
• W2942131290 hasConcept C126322002 @default.
• W2942131290 hasConcept C170493617 @default.
• W2942131290 hasConcept C178853913 @default.
• W2942131290 hasConcept C2776277131 @default.
• W2942131290 hasConcept C2776452961 @default.
• W2942131290 hasConcept C2776888792 @default.
• W2942131290 hasConcept C2777953023 @default.
• W2942131290 hasConcept C2778716859 @default.
• W2942131290 hasConcept C2778977083 @default.
• W2942131290 hasConcept C2779526319 @default.
• W2942131290 hasConcept C2781063702 @default.
• W2942131290 hasConcept C2781072394 @default.
• W2942131290 hasConcept C42219234 @default.
• W2942131290 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W2942131290 hasConcept C84393581 @default.
• W2942131290 hasConceptScore W2942131290C126322002 @default.
• W2942131290 hasConceptScore W2942131290C170493617 @default.
• W2942131290 hasConceptScore W2942131290C178853913 @default.
• W2942131290 hasConceptScore W2942131290C2776277131 @default.
• W2942131290 hasConceptScore W2942131290C2776452961 @default.
• W2942131290 hasConceptScore W2942131290C2776888792 @default.
• W2942131290 hasConceptScore W2942131290C2777953023 @default.
• W2942131290 hasConceptScore W2942131290C2778716859 @default.
• W2942131290 hasConceptScore W2942131290C2778977083 @default.
• W2942131290 hasConceptScore W2942131290C2779526319 @default.
• W2942131290 hasConceptScore W2942131290C2781063702 @default.
• W2942131290 hasConceptScore W2942131290C2781072394 @default.
• W2942131290 hasConceptScore W2942131290C42219234 @default.
• W2942131290 hasConceptScore W2942131290C71924100 @default.
• W2942131290 hasConceptScore W2942131290C84393581 @default.
• W2942131290 hasIssue "1" @default.
• W2942131290 hasLocation W29421312901 @default.
• W2942131290 hasLocation W29421312902 @default.
• W2942131290 hasLocation W29421312903 @default.
• W2942131290 hasLocation W29421312904 @default.
• W2942131290 hasOpenAccess W2942131290 @default.
• W2942131290 hasPrimaryLocation W29421312901 @default.
• W2942131290 hasRelatedWork W1971507051 @default.
• W2942131290 hasRelatedWork W2031907937 @default.
• W2942131290 hasRelatedWork W2078291986 @default.
• W2942131290 hasRelatedWork W2083253124 @default.
• W2942131290 hasRelatedWork W2091856118 @default.
• W2942131290 hasRelatedWork W2149893317 @default.
• W2942131290 hasRelatedWork W2313693855 @default.
• W2942131290 hasRelatedWork W2536868682 @default.
• W2942131290 hasRelatedWork W4242086103 @default.
• W2942131290 hasRelatedWork W3088448758 @default.
• W2942131290 hasVolume "13" @default.
• W2942131290 isParatext "false" @default.
• W2942131290 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W2942131290 magId "2942131290" @default.

• next