FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2943367873> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2943367873 abstract "An a priori design is essential to reduce the risk of bias in systematic reviews (SRs). To this end, authors can register their SR with PROSPERO, and/or publish a SR protocol in an academic journal. The latter has the advantage that the manuscript for the SR protocol is usually peer-reviewed. However, since authors ought not to begin/continue the SR before their protocol has been accepted for publication, it is crucial that SR protocols are processed in a timely manner. Our main aim was to descriptively analyse the peer review process of SR protocols published in ‘BMC Systematic Reviews’ from 2012 to 2017. We systematically searched MEDLINE via PubMed for all SR protocols published in ‘BMC Systematic Reviews’ between 2012 and 2017, except for protocols for overviews, scoping reviews or realist reviews. Data were extracted from the SR protocols and Open Peer Review reports. For each round of peer review, two researchers judged the extent of revision (minor/major) based on the reviewer reports. Their content was further investigated by two researchers in a random 10%-sample using PRISMA-P as a guideline. All data were analysed descriptively. We identified 544 eligible protocols published in ‘BMC Systematic Reviews’ between 2012 and 2017. Of those, 485 (89.2%) also registered the SR in PROSPERO, the majority (87.4%) before first submission of the manuscript for the SR protocol (median 49 days). The absolute number of published SR protocols increased from 2012 to 2017 (21 vs 145 protocols), as did the median processing time (61 vs 142 days from submission to acceptance) and the proportion of protocols requiring a major revision after first peer review (19.1% vs 52.4%). Reviewer comments most frequently addressed the PRISMA-P item ‘Eligibility criteria’. Overall, 76.0% of the reviewer comments suggested more transparency. The number of published SR protocols increased over the years, but so did the processing time. In 2017, it took several months from submission to acceptance, which is critical from an author’s perspective. New models of peer review such as post publication peer review for SR protocols should be investigated. This could probably be realized with PROSPERO." @default.
• W2943367873 created "2019-05-09" @default.
• W2943367873 creator A5006600606 @default.
• W2943367873 creator A5027099865 @default.
• W2943367873 creator A5057001720 @default.
• W2943367873 creator A5061145417 @default.
• W2943367873 creator A5086051380 @default.
• W2943367873 date "2019-03-13" @default.
• W2943367873 modified "2023-10-17" @default.
• W2943367873 title "A descriptive analysis of the characteristics and the peer review process of systematic review protocols published in an open peer review journal from 2012 to 2017" @default.
• W2943367873 cites W2026506934 @default.
• W2943367873 cites W2122274466 @default.
• W2943367873 cites W2141714716 @default.
• W2943367873 cites W2147545588 @default.
• W2943367873 cites W2147998509 @default.
• W2943367873 cites W2156100542 @default.
• W2943367873 cites W2161374186 @default.
• W2943367873 cites W2169205464 @default.
• W2943367873 cites W2396846174 @default.
• W2943367873 cites W2508504417 @default.
• W2943367873 cites W2551122076 @default.
• W2943367873 cites W2593758073 @default.
• W2943367873 cites W2756578555 @default.
• W2943367873 cites W2763072932 @default.
• W2943367873 cites W2766379990 @default.
• W2943367873 cites W2771455484 @default.
• W2943367873 cites W2772730498 @default.
• W2943367873 cites W2781942656 @default.
• W2943367873 cites W2783472197 @default.
• W2943367873 cites W2788728681 @default.
• W2943367873 doi "https://doi.org/10.1186/s12874-019-0698-8" @default.
• W2943367873 hasPubMedCentralId "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/6415341" @default.
• W2943367873 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/30866832" @default.
• W2943367873 hasPublicationYear "2019" @default.
• W2943367873 type Work @default.
• W2943367873 sameAs 2943367873 @default.
• W2943367873 citedByCount "11" @default.
• W2943367873 countsByYear W29433678732019 @default.
• W2943367873 countsByYear W29433678732020 @default.
• W2943367873 countsByYear W29433678732021 @default.
• W2943367873 countsByYear W29433678732022 @default.
• W2943367873 countsByYear W29433678732023 @default.
• W2943367873 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2943367873 hasAuthorship W2943367873A5006600606 @default.
• W2943367873 hasAuthorship W2943367873A5027099865 @default.
• W2943367873 hasAuthorship W2943367873A5057001720 @default.
• W2943367873 hasAuthorship W2943367873A5061145417 @default.
• W2943367873 hasAuthorship W2943367873A5086051380 @default.
• W2943367873 hasBestOaLocation W29433678731 @default.
• W2943367873 hasConcept C138368954 @default.
• W2943367873 hasConcept C142724271 @default.
• W2943367873 hasConcept C17744445 @default.
• W2943367873 hasConcept C189708586 @default.
• W2943367873 hasConcept C199539241 @default.
• W2943367873 hasConcept C204787440 @default.
• W2943367873 hasConcept C2779473830 @default.
• W2943367873 hasConcept C2780182762 @default.
• W2943367873 hasConcept C2780385302 @default.
• W2943367873 hasConcept C41008148 @default.
• W2943367873 hasConcept C41458344 @default.
• W2943367873 hasConcept C509550671 @default.
• W2943367873 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W2943367873 hasConceptScore W2943367873C138368954 @default.
• W2943367873 hasConceptScore W2943367873C142724271 @default.
• W2943367873 hasConceptScore W2943367873C17744445 @default.
• W2943367873 hasConceptScore W2943367873C189708586 @default.
• W2943367873 hasConceptScore W2943367873C199539241 @default.
• W2943367873 hasConceptScore W2943367873C204787440 @default.
• W2943367873 hasConceptScore W2943367873C2779473830 @default.
• W2943367873 hasConceptScore W2943367873C2780182762 @default.
• W2943367873 hasConceptScore W2943367873C2780385302 @default.
• W2943367873 hasConceptScore W2943367873C41008148 @default.
• W2943367873 hasConceptScore W2943367873C41458344 @default.
• W2943367873 hasConceptScore W2943367873C509550671 @default.
• W2943367873 hasConceptScore W2943367873C71924100 @default.
• W2943367873 hasIssue "1" @default.
• W2943367873 hasLocation W29433678731 @default.
• W2943367873 hasLocation W29433678732 @default.
• W2943367873 hasLocation W29433678733 @default.
• W2943367873 hasLocation W29433678734 @default.
• W2943367873 hasOpenAccess W2943367873 @default.
• W2943367873 hasPrimaryLocation W29433678731 @default.
• W2943367873 hasRelatedWork W2015816512 @default.
• W2943367873 hasRelatedWork W2034699312 @default.
• W2943367873 hasRelatedWork W2101005771 @default.
• W2943367873 hasRelatedWork W2471018431 @default.
• W2943367873 hasRelatedWork W2611995113 @default.
• W2943367873 hasRelatedWork W2739383797 @default.
• W2943367873 hasRelatedWork W2899084033 @default.
• W2943367873 hasRelatedWork W2901881702 @default.
• W2943367873 hasRelatedWork W3093012709 @default.
• W2943367873 hasRelatedWork W4255514511 @default.
• W2943367873 hasVolume "19" @default.
• W2943367873 isParatext "false" @default.
• W2943367873 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W2943367873 magId "2943367873" @default.
• W2943367873 workType "article" @default.