Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2943673984> ?p ?o ?g. }
- W2943673984 endingPage "534" @default.
- W2943673984 startingPage "534" @default.
- W2943673984 abstract "Evaluating prefeed gastric residuals is considered routine care but has little supporting evidence.To determine the effect of omitting prefeed gastric residual evaluation on nutritional outcomes in extremely preterm infants.This single-center randomized clinical trial compared the omission of gastric residual evaluation with prefeed gastric residual evaluation. Infants were recruited from a level 4 neonatal intensive care unit and were enrolled from October 17, 2013, to October 8, 2016, and then followed up for 6 weeks after birth. Eligible participants were infants born at 32 or fewer weeks' gestation with a birth weight of 1250 g or less; they were enrolled within 72 hours after birth and within 24 hours after feeding initiation. All participants (N = 143) were included in the modified intent-to-treat analysis, which was conducted from March to July 2018.The residual group underwent prefeed gastric residual evaluation; the no residual group did not. Feeding decisions were made according to nutritional guidelines, and infants received only human milk.The primary outcome was weekly enteral nutrition intake in mL/kg for 6 weeks after birth.Of 143 infants, 74 (51.7%) were randomized to undergo gastric residual evaluation (residual group) and 69 (48.3%) to omitted gastric residual evaluation (no residual group). The residual group comprised an even number of male and female infants (37 [50.0%]) with a mean (SD) gestational age of 27.1 (2.4) weeks and a mean (SD) birth weight of 888.8 (206.6) grams, whereas the no residual group had more male infants (36 [52.17%]), a mean (SD) gestational age of 27 (1.2) weeks, and a mean (SD) birth weight of 915.2 (180) grams. The no residual group had feedings that advanced more quickly compared with the residual group (mean weekly increase, 20.7 mL/kg/d vs 17.9 mL/kg/d; P = .02) and consumed more feedings at weeks 5 (137.2 [95% CI, 128.6-145.8]; P = .03) and 6 (141.6 [95% CI, 133.2-150.0]; P = .03). Among the secondary outcomes, the no residual group had higher mean estimated log weights (7.01 [95% CI, 6.99-7.02] vs 6.98 [95% CI, 6.97-7.00]; P = .03), had fewer episodes of abdominal distention (0.59 [95% CI, 0.34-1.01] vs 1.79 [95% CI, 1.27-2.53]; P = .001), and were discharged 8 days earlier (4.21 [95% CI, 4.14-4.28] vs 4.28 [95% CI, 4.19-4.36]; P = .01). Odds for necrotizing enterocolitis (0.058 [95% CI, 0.018-0.190] vs 0.026 [95% CI, 0.006-0.109]), death (0.004 [95% CI, 0.0003-0.046] vs 0.012 [95% CI, 0.001-0.131]), late-onset sepsis (0.970 [95% CI, 0.67-1.40] vs 1.38 [95% CI, 0.97-1.94]), and ventilator-associated pneumonia (0.084 [95% CI, 0.033-0.214] vs 0.056 [95% CI, 0.019-0.168]) were similar between groups.Among extremely preterm infants, the omission of gastric residual evaluation increased the delivery of enteral nutrition as well as improved weight gain and led to earlier hospital discharge; these results may translate into evidence-based practice.ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT01863043." @default.
- W2943673984 created "2019-05-09" @default.
- W2943673984 creator A5006349507 @default.
- W2943673984 creator A5013693047 @default.
- W2943673984 creator A5015105154 @default.
- W2943673984 creator A5032659851 @default.
- W2943673984 creator A5067723376 @default.
- W2943673984 creator A5074084625 @default.
- W2943673984 creator A5086918074 @default.
- W2943673984 date "2019-06-01" @default.
- W2943673984 modified "2023-10-10" @default.
- W2943673984 title "Effect of Gastric Residual Evaluation on Enteral Intake in Extremely Preterm Infants" @default.
- W2943673984 cites W1570622790 @default.
- W2943673984 cites W1918066866 @default.
- W2943673984 cites W1963834719 @default.
- W2943673984 cites W1975824941 @default.
- W2943673984 cites W1988929176 @default.
- W2943673984 cites W1992162770 @default.
- W2943673984 cites W1997588258 @default.
- W2943673984 cites W2003030515 @default.
- W2943673984 cites W2010362409 @default.
- W2943673984 cites W2019830873 @default.
- W2943673984 cites W2020686017 @default.
- W2943673984 cites W2058310865 @default.
- W2943673984 cites W2061711354 @default.
- W2943673984 cites W2066273364 @default.
- W2943673984 cites W2067986102 @default.
- W2943673984 cites W2088081911 @default.
- W2943673984 cites W2089777065 @default.
- W2943673984 cites W2091161589 @default.
- W2943673984 cites W2096693448 @default.
- W2943673984 cites W2104279724 @default.
- W2943673984 cites W2126863035 @default.
- W2943673984 cites W2134388933 @default.
- W2943673984 cites W2150026666 @default.
- W2943673984 cites W2152950677 @default.
- W2943673984 cites W2159519210 @default.
- W2943673984 cites W2282212210 @default.
- W2943673984 cites W2334170915 @default.
- W2943673984 cites W2410745643 @default.
- W2943673984 cites W2410953492 @default.
- W2943673984 cites W2524857649 @default.
- W2943673984 cites W2584454916 @default.
- W2943673984 cites W2604198543 @default.
- W2943673984 cites W2622220706 @default.
- W2943673984 cites W2626692948 @default.
- W2943673984 cites W2731504634 @default.
- W2943673984 cites W2754809616 @default.
- W2943673984 cites W2758066387 @default.
- W2943673984 cites W2760784002 @default.
- W2943673984 cites W2791251323 @default.
- W2943673984 cites W2799646348 @default.
- W2943673984 cites W2805989935 @default.
- W2943673984 cites W2939622165 @default.
- W2943673984 cites W4235469056 @default.
- W2943673984 cites W4236911184 @default.
- W2943673984 cites W4255984878 @default.
- W2943673984 doi "https://doi.org/10.1001/jamapediatrics.2019.0800" @default.
- W2943673984 hasPubMedCentralId "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/6547072" @default.
- W2943673984 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/31034045" @default.
- W2943673984 hasPublicationYear "2019" @default.
- W2943673984 type Work @default.
- W2943673984 sameAs 2943673984 @default.
- W2943673984 citedByCount "45" @default.
- W2943673984 countsByYear W29436739842019 @default.
- W2943673984 countsByYear W29436739842020 @default.
- W2943673984 countsByYear W29436739842021 @default.
- W2943673984 countsByYear W29436739842022 @default.
- W2943673984 countsByYear W29436739842023 @default.
- W2943673984 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
- W2943673984 hasAuthorship W2943673984A5006349507 @default.
- W2943673984 hasAuthorship W2943673984A5013693047 @default.
- W2943673984 hasAuthorship W2943673984A5015105154 @default.
- W2943673984 hasAuthorship W2943673984A5032659851 @default.
- W2943673984 hasAuthorship W2943673984A5067723376 @default.
- W2943673984 hasAuthorship W2943673984A5074084625 @default.
- W2943673984 hasAuthorship W2943673984A5086918074 @default.
- W2943673984 hasBestOaLocation W29436739841 @default.
- W2943673984 hasConcept C11413529 @default.
- W2943673984 hasConcept C126322002 @default.
- W2943673984 hasConcept C155512373 @default.
- W2943673984 hasConcept C168563851 @default.
- W2943673984 hasConcept C187212893 @default.
- W2943673984 hasConcept C2777091541 @default.
- W2943673984 hasConcept C2778376644 @default.
- W2943673984 hasConcept C2779083892 @default.
- W2943673984 hasConcept C2779234561 @default.
- W2943673984 hasConcept C41008148 @default.
- W2943673984 hasConcept C44315111 @default.
- W2943673984 hasConcept C46973012 @default.
- W2943673984 hasConcept C54355233 @default.
- W2943673984 hasConcept C66322754 @default.
- W2943673984 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
- W2943673984 hasConcept C78722104 @default.
- W2943673984 hasConcept C86803240 @default.
- W2943673984 hasConceptScore W2943673984C11413529 @default.
- W2943673984 hasConceptScore W2943673984C126322002 @default.
- W2943673984 hasConceptScore W2943673984C155512373 @default.