FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2945469874> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2945469874 endingPage "123" @default.
• W2945469874 startingPage "108" @default.
• W2945469874 abstract "Purpose This paper aims to understand the emergence, operation and evolution of judge-centred models for the enforcement of competition law in Ireland and in Hong Kong SAR. The public enforcement model in Hong Kong chimes with the Irish regime where competence to adjudicate on competition law violations and to impose sanctions is intentionally reserved exclusively to judges. This design choice renders the Irish and Hong Kong regimes both similar to each other and atypical on the global stage, where in many jurisdictions an administrative competition agency investigates suspected infringements, makes determinations of infringements and may penalise infringers. Design/methodology/approach This paper starts by detailing the current competition law architecture in each jurisdiction. Then, it examines closely the discourse (expressed in consultations, experts’ reports and Parliamentary documents) in the lengthy period preceding their introduction. This approach aims, firstly, to understand why judicial models were chosen over more familiar administrative ones and, secondly, to unearth any similar concerns which had a bearing on the choice of atypical design. Next, it analyses some implications of the judicial model in operation for, firstly, parties; secondly, the administrative competition agencies; and, thirdly, the evolution of competition law. Findings It finds the existence of similar concerns surrounding due process/separation of power arose in each jurisdiction. Other similar strands include a sluggish political appetite which delayed reform. Each jurisdiction actively sought to inform itself about international experience but did not feel obliged to copy the enforcement dimension even where substantive prohibitions were persuasive. Research limitations/implications It shines a light on the independent response by two small Common Law jurisdictions, which does not converge with popular administrative international models of competition law enforcement. Practical implications It is hoped that the decades-long experience in Ireland may interest those involved in Hong Kong competition law, which is at a comparatively fledgling stage of development. Originality/value This is an original research and appears to be the first paper exploring the atypical approaches taken in Hong Kong SAR and Ireland to designing locally suited regimes for the enforcement of competition law." @default.
• W2945469874 created "2019-05-29" @default.
• W2945469874 creator A5049996565 @default.
• W2945469874 date "2019-06-17" @default.
• W2945469874 modified "2023-09-25" @default.
• W2945469874 title "Competition law enforcement in Hong Kong SAR and in Ireland: similar and atypical" @default.
• W2945469874 cites W2313906644 @default.
• W2945469874 cites W3124587027 @default.
• W2945469874 doi "https://doi.org/10.1108/jitlp-10-2018-0042" @default.
• W2945469874 hasPublicationYear "2019" @default.
• W2945469874 type Work @default.
• W2945469874 sameAs 2945469874 @default.
• W2945469874 citedByCount "12" @default.
• W2945469874 countsByYear W29454698742021 @default.
• W2945469874 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2945469874 hasAuthorship W2945469874A5049996565 @default.
• W2945469874 hasConcept C144133560 @default.
• W2945469874 hasConcept C162324750 @default.
• W2945469874 hasConcept C17744445 @default.
• W2945469874 hasConcept C18903297 @default.
• W2945469874 hasConcept C190253527 @default.
• W2945469874 hasConcept C199539241 @default.
• W2945469874 hasConcept C2776736423 @default.
• W2945469874 hasConcept C2776949292 @default.
• W2945469874 hasConcept C2778069335 @default.
• W2945469874 hasConcept C2779520724 @default.
• W2945469874 hasConcept C2779777834 @default.
• W2945469874 hasConcept C2781127519 @default.
• W2945469874 hasConcept C34447519 @default.
• W2945469874 hasConcept C86803240 @default.
• W2945469874 hasConcept C91306197 @default.
• W2945469874 hasConceptScore W2945469874C144133560 @default.
• W2945469874 hasConceptScore W2945469874C162324750 @default.
• W2945469874 hasConceptScore W2945469874C17744445 @default.
• W2945469874 hasConceptScore W2945469874C18903297 @default.
• W2945469874 hasConceptScore W2945469874C190253527 @default.
• W2945469874 hasConceptScore W2945469874C199539241 @default.
• W2945469874 hasConceptScore W2945469874C2776736423 @default.
• W2945469874 hasConceptScore W2945469874C2776949292 @default.
• W2945469874 hasConceptScore W2945469874C2778069335 @default.
• W2945469874 hasConceptScore W2945469874C2779520724 @default.
• W2945469874 hasConceptScore W2945469874C2779777834 @default.
• W2945469874 hasConceptScore W2945469874C2781127519 @default.
• W2945469874 hasConceptScore W2945469874C34447519 @default.
• W2945469874 hasConceptScore W2945469874C86803240 @default.
• W2945469874 hasConceptScore W2945469874C91306197 @default.
• W2945469874 hasIssue "2" @default.
• W2945469874 hasLocation W29454698741 @default.
• W2945469874 hasOpenAccess W2945469874 @default.
• W2945469874 hasPrimaryLocation W29454698741 @default.
• W2945469874 hasRelatedWork W1517190092 @default.
• W2945469874 hasRelatedWork W2189950441 @default.
• W2945469874 hasRelatedWork W2219765956 @default.
• W2945469874 hasRelatedWork W2302229807 @default.
• W2945469874 hasRelatedWork W2383469672 @default.
• W2945469874 hasRelatedWork W2749285007 @default.
• W2945469874 hasRelatedWork W2984077386 @default.
• W2945469874 hasRelatedWork W3124054656 @default.
• W2945469874 hasRelatedWork W3146593319 @default.
• W2945469874 hasRelatedWork W3210685783 @default.
• W2945469874 hasVolume "18" @default.
• W2945469874 isParatext "false" @default.
• W2945469874 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W2945469874 magId "2945469874" @default.
• W2945469874 workType "article" @default.