FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2945570021> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2945570021 abstract "This paper aims to review the scale development research published in Turkey between 2006 and 2016 with regard to their processes of exploratory (EFA) and confirmatory factor analysis (CFA). Within this scope, the distribution of the studies according to years and factor analyses, the extent to which their hypotheses came through for both analysis methods, and the distribution of EFA and CFA results according to the published papers were investigated. In this way, we aimed to infer significant results on the practical application of EFA and CFA which are frequently referred in theory. Hence, the present research incorporates a descriptive document analysis on 131 scale development studies published in the fields of education and social sciences in the journals indexed in The Scientific and Technological Research Council of Turkey (TÜBİTAK) TR Dizin data base between 2006 and 2016. Frequency tables, column charts, histogram, line charts, and measures of central tendency were used to analyse the data. More than 70% of 131 scale development studies were carried out after 2013. The maximum number of studies was published in 2015, and the minimum number in 2008. Only EFA was used in 59 articles, only CFA was used in 4 articles, and both analysis methods were employed in 58 articles. The remaining 10 papers used none of the analyses and included only item analyses. The average sample sizes were 395 participants for EFA and 529 participants for CFA. Sample sizes were accordingly adequate in terms of the factor analyses. EFA and CFA were conducted over the same sample in 36 papers, whereas the analyses were based on different samples in 22 ones. In terms of estimation, 65% of 117 EFA using papers employed Principle Component Analysis (PCA), 2% used Maximum Likelihood Estimation (MLE), 1% used Parallel Analysis (PA), and 3% used Principle Axis Factoring (PAF), while 29% did not specify their method of estimation. The hypotheses of EFA analyses were examined in 93% of the papers. Scree plots were taken into consideration when determing the number of factors in 50% of the papers. Varimax rotation method was used in 67% of the EFA using papers. The total variance explained was 53.05%. The analytical hypotheses were not examined in 87% of the 62 studies conducted with CFA; 51 of them included track diagrams and 52 included factor loadings. 90% of the papers did not give any information on parameter estimation method. All indices, except the Parsimony Goodness of Fit Index (PGFI), were acceptable as model fit indices in the papers. The results from the papers examined were evaluated in the light of the relevant literature in the last section of the present paper, and some suggestions were made in reference to both theory and practice." @default.
• W2945570021 created "2019-05-29" @default.
• W2945570021 creator A5025747853 @default.
• W2945570021 creator A5027433606 @default.
• W2945570021 date "2019-04-22" @default.
• W2945570021 modified "2023-10-16" @default.
• W2945570021 title "The Use of Exploratory and Confirmatory Factor Analyses: A Document Analysis" @default.
• W2945570021 cites W1493632016 @default.
• W2945570021 cites W1496437928 @default.
• W2945570021 cites W1560371066 @default.
• W2945570021 cites W1598133101 @default.
• W2945570021 cites W1681695349 @default.
• W2945570021 cites W1748403502 @default.
• W2945570021 cites W196041357 @default.
• W2945570021 cites W1968427994 @default.
• W2945570021 cites W1971726054 @default.
• W2945570021 cites W1972806788 @default.
• W2945570021 cites W1977775666 @default.
• W2945570021 cites W1983981789 @default.
• W2945570021 cites W1986234982 @default.
• W2945570021 cites W1992193527 @default.
• W2945570021 cites W1994263489 @default.
• W2945570021 cites W2005092827 @default.
• W2945570021 cites W2005364767 @default.
• W2945570021 cites W2020661211 @default.
• W2945570021 cites W2026348057 @default.
• W2945570021 cites W2030741364 @default.
• W2945570021 cites W2033683658 @default.
• W2945570021 cites W2042539525 @default.
• W2945570021 cites W2056434135 @default.
• W2945570021 cites W2058513103 @default.
• W2945570021 cites W2066005979 @default.
• W2945570021 cites W2071666535 @default.
• W2945570021 cites W2097665571 @default.
• W2945570021 cites W2104709233 @default.
• W2945570021 cites W2133487567 @default.
• W2945570021 cites W2148812496 @default.
• W2945570021 cites W2149608872 @default.
• W2945570021 cites W2159466611 @default.
• W2945570021 cites W2163403362 @default.
• W2945570021 cites W2338491375 @default.
• W2945570021 cites W2481311847 @default.
• W2945570021 cites W2532344875 @default.
• W2945570021 cites W2548528780 @default.
• W2945570021 cites W2782268337 @default.
• W2945570021 cites W2903041137 @default.
• W2945570021 cites W2908934668 @default.
• W2945570021 cites W3144127399 @default.
• W2945570021 cites W69274875 @default.
• W2945570021 cites W2145642298 @default.
• W2945570021 cites W3004647199 @default.
• W2945570021 doi "https://doi.org/10.15390/eb.2019.7665" @default.
• W2945570021 hasPublicationYear "2019" @default.
• W2945570021 type Work @default.
• W2945570021 sameAs 2945570021 @default.
• W2945570021 citedByCount "28" @default.
• W2945570021 countsByYear W29455700212020 @default.
• W2945570021 countsByYear W29455700212021 @default.
• W2945570021 countsByYear W29455700212022 @default.
• W2945570021 countsByYear W29455700212023 @default.
• W2945570021 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2945570021 hasAuthorship W2945570021A5025747853 @default.
• W2945570021 hasAuthorship W2945570021A5027433606 @default.
• W2945570021 hasBestOaLocation W29455700211 @default.
• W2945570021 hasConcept C105795698 @default.
• W2945570021 hasConcept C129848803 @default.
• W2945570021 hasConcept C15744967 @default.
• W2945570021 hasConcept C165957694 @default.
• W2945570021 hasConcept C171606756 @default.
• W2945570021 hasConcept C17744445 @default.
• W2945570021 hasConcept C185592680 @default.
• W2945570021 hasConcept C198531522 @default.
• W2945570021 hasConcept C199539241 @default.
• W2945570021 hasConcept C205649164 @default.
• W2945570021 hasConcept C2778755073 @default.
• W2945570021 hasConcept C2779455604 @default.
• W2945570021 hasConcept C33923547 @default.
• W2945570021 hasConcept C39896193 @default.
• W2945570021 hasConcept C40722632 @default.
• W2945570021 hasConcept C43617362 @default.
• W2945570021 hasConcept C58640448 @default.
• W2945570021 hasConcept C70410870 @default.
• W2945570021 hasConcept C71104824 @default.
• W2945570021 hasConceptScore W2945570021C105795698 @default.
• W2945570021 hasConceptScore W2945570021C129848803 @default.
• W2945570021 hasConceptScore W2945570021C15744967 @default.
• W2945570021 hasConceptScore W2945570021C165957694 @default.
• W2945570021 hasConceptScore W2945570021C171606756 @default.
• W2945570021 hasConceptScore W2945570021C17744445 @default.
• W2945570021 hasConceptScore W2945570021C185592680 @default.
• W2945570021 hasConceptScore W2945570021C198531522 @default.
• W2945570021 hasConceptScore W2945570021C199539241 @default.
• W2945570021 hasConceptScore W2945570021C205649164 @default.
• W2945570021 hasConceptScore W2945570021C2778755073 @default.
• W2945570021 hasConceptScore W2945570021C2779455604 @default.
• W2945570021 hasConceptScore W2945570021C33923547 @default.
• W2945570021 hasConceptScore W2945570021C39896193 @default.
• W2945570021 hasConceptScore W2945570021C40722632 @default.
• W2945570021 hasConceptScore W2945570021C43617362 @default.
• W2945570021 hasConceptScore W2945570021C58640448 @default.

• next