FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2946934963> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2946934963 endingPage "270" @default.
• W2946934963 startingPage "263" @default.
• W2946934963 abstract "No means exists to classify the overall credibility of physical torture allegations, which relies on qualitative forensic medical criteria. To develop procedures for processing physical data from torture allegations in order to achieve robust credibility assessments. To assess inter-observer variation in semi-quantitative evaluations. To analyse the importance of physical aspects for the overall assessment of allegations of torture. To assess the correlation between a quantitative description of physical aspects of torture and the appraisal of credibility based on the semi-quantitative model. We developed a semi-quantitative model to assess credibility of physical torture allegations and a model to describe allegations quantitatively. Information about physical aspects of ill-treatment in 202 extensive reports made by psychologists (part of a Basque Country Governmental project) was appraised individually and jointly by the two authors in the semi-quantitative model. Inter-observer variation was appraised. The assessed credibility based on physical details was compared with the psychologists’ overall assessments and with the quantitative scoring of physical data. The inter-observer agreement was substantial with kappa values of 0.64–0.77. Peer-reviewing revealed an error; using the defined criteria in the models facilitated achievement of common opinions. Comparison of credibility assessments found by different means suggests that physical data may be given a low priority in the overall assessment of torture allegations. There was a strong correlation (r = 0,86, p < 0.001) between the semi-quantitative credibility assessment and the quantitative scoring of physical aspects of torture, reinforcing the validity of both means. Peer-reviewing of physical aspects of torture based on a qualitative /semi-quantitative /quantitative multi-step analysis leads to robust assessments of credibility. A procedure is needed on how to merge the credibility assessments of the psychological and the physical data into an overall conclusion. We suggest that the highest level of the two evaluations should constitute the overall credibility assessment. The examinations were done years after the detentions, they were not focused on physical details and the data we used was retrieved retrospectively." @default.
• W2946934963 created "2019-06-07" @default.
• W2946934963 creator A5049819059 @default.
• W2946934963 creator A5081007547 @default.
• W2946934963 date "2019-08-01" @default.
• W2946934963 modified "2023-10-11" @default.
• W2946934963 title "Assessing the level of credibility of allegations of physical torture" @default.
• W2946934963 cites W1980456915 @default.
• W2946934963 cites W2058404662 @default.
• W2946934963 cites W105716670 @default.
• W2946934963 doi "https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forsciint.2019.05.043" @default.
• W2946934963 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/31185439" @default.
• W2946934963 hasPublicationYear "2019" @default.
• W2946934963 type Work @default.
• W2946934963 sameAs 2946934963 @default.
• W2946934963 citedByCount "8" @default.
• W2946934963 countsByYear W29469349632020 @default.
• W2946934963 countsByYear W29469349632021 @default.
• W2946934963 countsByYear W29469349632023 @default.
• W2946934963 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2946934963 hasAuthorship W2946934963A5049819059 @default.
• W2946934963 hasAuthorship W2946934963A5081007547 @default.
• W2946934963 hasConcept C121332964 @default.
• W2946934963 hasConcept C15744967 @default.
• W2946934963 hasConcept C169437150 @default.
• W2946934963 hasConcept C17744445 @default.
• W2946934963 hasConcept C199539241 @default.
• W2946934963 hasConcept C2780224610 @default.
• W2946934963 hasConcept C2780704645 @default.
• W2946934963 hasConcept C3017944768 @default.
• W2946934963 hasConcept C544040105 @default.
• W2946934963 hasConcept C62520636 @default.
• W2946934963 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W2946934963 hasConcept C75630572 @default.
• W2946934963 hasConcept C77805123 @default.
• W2946934963 hasConcept C99454951 @default.
• W2946934963 hasConceptScore W2946934963C121332964 @default.
• W2946934963 hasConceptScore W2946934963C15744967 @default.
• W2946934963 hasConceptScore W2946934963C169437150 @default.
• W2946934963 hasConceptScore W2946934963C17744445 @default.
• W2946934963 hasConceptScore W2946934963C199539241 @default.
• W2946934963 hasConceptScore W2946934963C2780224610 @default.
• W2946934963 hasConceptScore W2946934963C2780704645 @default.
• W2946934963 hasConceptScore W2946934963C3017944768 @default.
• W2946934963 hasConceptScore W2946934963C544040105 @default.
• W2946934963 hasConceptScore W2946934963C62520636 @default.
• W2946934963 hasConceptScore W2946934963C71924100 @default.
• W2946934963 hasConceptScore W2946934963C75630572 @default.
• W2946934963 hasConceptScore W2946934963C77805123 @default.
• W2946934963 hasConceptScore W2946934963C99454951 @default.
• W2946934963 hasLocation W29469349631 @default.
• W2946934963 hasLocation W29469349632 @default.
• W2946934963 hasOpenAccess W2946934963 @default.
• W2946934963 hasPrimaryLocation W29469349631 @default.
• W2946934963 hasRelatedWork W1999388728 @default.
• W2946934963 hasRelatedWork W2093852186 @default.
• W2946934963 hasRelatedWork W2493295273 @default.
• W2946934963 hasRelatedWork W2748952813 @default.
• W2946934963 hasRelatedWork W2899084033 @default.
• W2946934963 hasRelatedWork W2946934963 @default.
• W2946934963 hasRelatedWork W2955403871 @default.
• W2946934963 hasRelatedWork W3121894388 @default.
• W2946934963 hasRelatedWork W346122446 @default.
• W2946934963 hasRelatedWork W604382258 @default.
• W2946934963 hasVolume "301" @default.
• W2946934963 isParatext "false" @default.
• W2946934963 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W2946934963 magId "2946934963" @default.
• W2946934963 workType "article" @default.