FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2946959093> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2946959093 abstract "Background: In view of the limited utility of pelvic radiography to recognize sacroiliitis in its earliest stages, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) has been considered as a reliable imaging modality to detect acute subchondral inflammation at disease onset. However, several recent studies reported a high proportion of false-positive of sacroiliac joints (SIJ) MRI. Other studies demonstrated that computed tomography (CT), by its ability to detect early structural damage, may be helpful. Consequently, strengths and limitations of each imaging technique need to be considered when choosing the most appropriate first-line modality in clinical practice. Objectives: We aimed to assess the performance of CT scanning and MRI for detecting sacroiliitis in early SpA by estimating the sensitivity and the specificity of each imaging technique. Methods: Consecutive patients, aged 16 years and over, referred for symptoms suggestive of SpA from February 2014 to February 2017 were enrolled in this cohort. After excluding patients whose conventional radiography showed a confirmed sacroiliitis, eligible patients underwent SIJ CT and/or MRI. The CT and MR images were reviewed by 2 musculoskeletal radiologists blinded to clinical findings. Then, 2 rheumatologists recorded from the clinical files if patients fulfilled the ASAS (Assessment of Spondyloarthritis international Society) classification criteria for SpA. This classification was considered as the gold standard of this study. Results: Fifty-three patients were included: 14 men and 39 women. The mean age was 36 years. The prevalences of HLA–B27 and elevated CRP were 27.6% and 16%, respectively. Fifty-eight percent of the patients (n=31) fulfilled the ASAS criteria for axial SpA. Among these patients, 30 patients underwent SIJ CT and 27 underwent SIJ MRI. Sacroiliitis was visualized by CT in 28 out of 30 patients (93.3%) and by MRI in 17 out of 27 patients (63%). Among the 22 patients who did not fulfill the ASAS criteria for SpA, 21 patients underwent SIJ CT and 20 underwent SIJ MRI. Sacroiliitis was not visualized by CT in any patients and was visualized by MRI in 2 out of 20 patients (10%). Sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative likelihood ratio of CT calculated with ASAS classification as golden standard were respectively estimated at 93.3%, 100%, 100% and 91.3%. Youden index was estimated at 0.93 and Q Yule coefficient at 1. Sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative likelihood ratio of MRI calculated with ASAS classification as golden standard were respectively estimated at 62.9%, 90%, 89.5% and 64.3%. Youden index was estimated at 0.53 and Q Yule coefficient at 0.88. Conclusion: In our study, the evaluation of sacroiliitis by CT, in comparison with MRI, has shown to be more sensitive and more specific. However, other factors should also be taken into account while comparing CT and MRI such as the high radiation exposure of CT scanning in the one hand and the cost and the restricted accessibility of MRI in the other hand. Disclosure of Interests: None declared" @default.
• W2946959093 created "2019-06-07" @default.
• W2946959093 creator A5003999530 @default.
• W2946959093 creator A5006415769 @default.
• W2946959093 creator A5012492123 @default.
• W2946959093 creator A5028940407 @default.
• W2946959093 creator A5031715739 @default.
• W2946959093 creator A5032242674 @default.
• W2946959093 creator A5068773826 @default.
• W2946959093 date "2019-06-01" @default.
• W2946959093 modified "2023-10-16" @default.
• W2946959093 title "THU0384 IMAGING OF SACROILIAC JOINTS IN EARLY SPONDYLOARTHRITIS: SHOULD WE CHOOSE COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY OR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING?" @default.
• W2946959093 doi "https://doi.org/10.1136/annrheumdis-2019-eular.6460" @default.
• W2946959093 hasPublicationYear "2019" @default.
• W2946959093 type Work @default.
• W2946959093 sameAs 2946959093 @default.
• W2946959093 citedByCount "0" @default.
• W2946959093 crossrefType "proceedings-article" @default.
• W2946959093 hasAuthorship W2946959093A5003999530 @default.
• W2946959093 hasAuthorship W2946959093A5006415769 @default.
• W2946959093 hasAuthorship W2946959093A5012492123 @default.
• W2946959093 hasAuthorship W2946959093A5028940407 @default.
• W2946959093 hasAuthorship W2946959093A5031715739 @default.
• W2946959093 hasAuthorship W2946959093A5032242674 @default.
• W2946959093 hasAuthorship W2946959093A5068773826 @default.
• W2946959093 hasBestOaLocation W29469590931 @default.
• W2946959093 hasConcept C126322002 @default.
• W2946959093 hasConcept C126838900 @default.
• W2946959093 hasConcept C143409427 @default.
• W2946959093 hasConcept C2778579456 @default.
• W2946959093 hasConcept C2778614933 @default.
• W2946959093 hasConcept C3019088015 @default.
• W2946959093 hasConcept C36454342 @default.
• W2946959093 hasConcept C40993552 @default.
• W2946959093 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W2946959093 hasConcept C72563966 @default.
• W2946959093 hasConceptScore W2946959093C126322002 @default.
• W2946959093 hasConceptScore W2946959093C126838900 @default.
• W2946959093 hasConceptScore W2946959093C143409427 @default.
• W2946959093 hasConceptScore W2946959093C2778579456 @default.
• W2946959093 hasConceptScore W2946959093C2778614933 @default.
• W2946959093 hasConceptScore W2946959093C3019088015 @default.
• W2946959093 hasConceptScore W2946959093C36454342 @default.
• W2946959093 hasConceptScore W2946959093C40993552 @default.
• W2946959093 hasConceptScore W2946959093C71924100 @default.
• W2946959093 hasConceptScore W2946959093C72563966 @default.
• W2946959093 hasLocation W29469590931 @default.
• W2946959093 hasOpenAccess W2946959093 @default.
• W2946959093 hasPrimaryLocation W29469590931 @default.
• W2946959093 hasRelatedWork W1531282033 @default.
• W2946959093 hasRelatedWork W1550429563 @default.
• W2946959093 hasRelatedWork W1988661559 @default.
• W2946959093 hasRelatedWork W2028826297 @default.
• W2946959093 hasRelatedWork W2322760244 @default.
• W2946959093 hasRelatedWork W2327313988 @default.
• W2946959093 hasRelatedWork W2401428910 @default.
• W2946959093 hasRelatedWork W2527200304 @default.
• W2946959093 hasRelatedWork W2549544722 @default.
• W2946959093 hasRelatedWork W2754306040 @default.
• W2946959093 hasRelatedWork W2755285212 @default.
• W2946959093 hasRelatedWork W2808493848 @default.
• W2946959093 hasRelatedWork W2887209502 @default.
• W2946959093 hasRelatedWork W2909652654 @default.
• W2946959093 hasRelatedWork W3035317707 @default.
• W2946959093 hasRelatedWork W3089473057 @default.
• W2946959093 hasRelatedWork W3124768173 @default.
• W2946959093 hasRelatedWork W3197142070 @default.
• W2946959093 hasRelatedWork W653592617 @default.
• W2946959093 hasRelatedWork W3093233393 @default.
• W2946959093 isParatext "false" @default.
• W2946959093 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W2946959093 magId "2946959093" @default.
• W2946959093 workType "article" @default.