FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2947010083> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2947010083 abstract "In countries where abortion is legally restricted or clandestine, estimates of abortion incidence are needed in order to bring attention to the reality of this practice. Innovations in methods for estimating stigmatized behaviors, coupled with changes in the conditions under which women obtain abortions, prompt us to review new approaches to estimating abortion incidence and propose innovations in this field. We discuss five approaches for yielding accurate estimates in countries with restrictive abortion laws. These include two prevailing approaches in the field (direct questioning of women about their abortions and the Abortion Incidence Complications Method (AICM)), one that has begun to be in use in recent years (the List Experiment) and two that are newly proposed by the authors (the Confidante Approach and a modification of the AICM). We discuss assumptions, strengths and weaknesses of each approach. Finally, we suggest strategies for assessing the validity of the findings in the absence of a gold standard. Though direct questioning has consistently been shown to miss many abortions, reporting can potentially be improved by normalizing or reframing the experience of abortion. The AICM has had the advantage of not relying on women’s reports about their abortions; however as self-induced abortion becomes more common, this strength becomes a weakness. The modified AICM, which uses women’s abortion reports to estimate the proportion of abortions that lead to treated complications, improves our chances of capturing self-induced abortions. The List Experiment preserves the woman’s anonymity (not just her confidentiality), but it can be cognitively challenging and the potential to make subgroup estimates is extremely limited. The Confidante Approach entails asking survey respondents about abortions among women who confide in them, rather than their own abortions. An adjustment factor can be applied to estimate the incidence of confidantes’ abortions that are unknown to respondents. This approach relies on the assumption that women know and will report whether their confidantes had an abortion. In the absence of a gold standard measure of abortion incidence, four strategies can be employed to compare and assess these approaches: (a) comparing the level of underreporting across methods susceptible to underreporting but not to overreporting, (2) validating components of abortion estimates against an objective measure, (3) testing whether these strategies accurately estimate other sensitive behaviors for which a gold standard exists, and 4) sensitivity analyses. Ultimately, it might be appropriate to employ more than one methodology when measuring abortion incidence." @default.
• W2947010083 created "2019-06-07" @default.
• W2947010083 creator A5019105057 @default.
• W2947010083 creator A5083322061 @default.
• W2947010083 date "2019-04-18" @default.
• W2947010083 modified "2023-10-18" @default.
• W2947010083 title "Novel approaches to estimating abortion incidence" @default.
• W2947010083 cites W1502668321 @default.
• W2947010083 cites W1935171624 @default.
• W2947010083 cites W1942516547 @default.
• W2947010083 cites W1976096657 @default.
• W2947010083 cites W2024992864 @default.
• W2947010083 cites W2030260735 @default.
• W2947010083 cites W2053914375 @default.
• W2947010083 cites W2076388729 @default.
• W2947010083 cites W2091353503 @default.
• W2947010083 cites W2096144234 @default.
• W2947010083 cites W2103819798 @default.
• W2947010083 cites W2139091542 @default.
• W2947010083 cites W2139737507 @default.
• W2947010083 cites W2322999071 @default.
• W2947010083 cites W2770462595 @default.
• W2947010083 cites W2795741177 @default.
• W2947010083 cites W2887514142 @default.
• W2947010083 doi "https://doi.org/10.1186/s12978-019-0702-0" @default.
• W2947010083 hasPubMedCentralId "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/6472065" @default.
• W2947010083 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/30999917" @default.
• W2947010083 hasPublicationYear "2019" @default.
• W2947010083 type Work @default.
• W2947010083 sameAs 2947010083 @default.
• W2947010083 citedByCount "35" @default.
• W2947010083 countsByYear W29470100832019 @default.
• W2947010083 countsByYear W29470100832020 @default.
• W2947010083 countsByYear W29470100832021 @default.
• W2947010083 countsByYear W29470100832022 @default.
• W2947010083 countsByYear W29470100832023 @default.
• W2947010083 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2947010083 hasAuthorship W2947010083A5019105057 @default.
• W2947010083 hasAuthorship W2947010083A5083322061 @default.
• W2947010083 hasBestOaLocation W29470100831 @default.
• W2947010083 hasConcept C15744967 @default.
• W2947010083 hasConcept C17744445 @default.
• W2947010083 hasConcept C187029079 @default.
• W2947010083 hasConcept C199539241 @default.
• W2947010083 hasConcept C2524010 @default.
• W2947010083 hasConcept C2776210078 @default.
• W2947010083 hasConcept C2778642596 @default.
• W2947010083 hasConcept C2779076696 @default.
• W2947010083 hasConcept C2779234561 @default.
• W2947010083 hasConcept C2908647359 @default.
• W2947010083 hasConcept C2986817661 @default.
• W2947010083 hasConcept C33923547 @default.
• W2947010083 hasConcept C54355233 @default.
• W2947010083 hasConcept C61511704 @default.
• W2947010083 hasConcept C71745522 @default.
• W2947010083 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W2947010083 hasConcept C77805123 @default.
• W2947010083 hasConcept C86803240 @default.
• W2947010083 hasConcept C99454951 @default.
• W2947010083 hasConceptScore W2947010083C15744967 @default.
• W2947010083 hasConceptScore W2947010083C17744445 @default.
• W2947010083 hasConceptScore W2947010083C187029079 @default.
• W2947010083 hasConceptScore W2947010083C199539241 @default.
• W2947010083 hasConceptScore W2947010083C2524010 @default.
• W2947010083 hasConceptScore W2947010083C2776210078 @default.
• W2947010083 hasConceptScore W2947010083C2778642596 @default.
• W2947010083 hasConceptScore W2947010083C2779076696 @default.
• W2947010083 hasConceptScore W2947010083C2779234561 @default.
• W2947010083 hasConceptScore W2947010083C2908647359 @default.
• W2947010083 hasConceptScore W2947010083C2986817661 @default.
• W2947010083 hasConceptScore W2947010083C33923547 @default.
• W2947010083 hasConceptScore W2947010083C54355233 @default.
• W2947010083 hasConceptScore W2947010083C61511704 @default.
• W2947010083 hasConceptScore W2947010083C71745522 @default.
• W2947010083 hasConceptScore W2947010083C71924100 @default.
• W2947010083 hasConceptScore W2947010083C77805123 @default.
• W2947010083 hasConceptScore W2947010083C86803240 @default.
• W2947010083 hasConceptScore W2947010083C99454951 @default.
• W2947010083 hasIssue "1" @default.
• W2947010083 hasLocation W29470100831 @default.
• W2947010083 hasLocation W29470100832 @default.
• W2947010083 hasLocation W29470100833 @default.
• W2947010083 hasLocation W29470100834 @default.
• W2947010083 hasLocation W29470100835 @default.
• W2947010083 hasOpenAccess W2947010083 @default.
• W2947010083 hasPrimaryLocation W29470100831 @default.
• W2947010083 hasRelatedWork W1580426574 @default.
• W2947010083 hasRelatedWork W1953405202 @default.
• W2947010083 hasRelatedWork W1984877488 @default.
• W2947010083 hasRelatedWork W2089620537 @default.
• W2947010083 hasRelatedWork W2275480158 @default.
• W2947010083 hasRelatedWork W2323950372 @default.
• W2947010083 hasRelatedWork W2371214482 @default.
• W2947010083 hasRelatedWork W2929987155 @default.
• W2947010083 hasRelatedWork W3095306390 @default.
• W2947010083 hasRelatedWork W4238089809 @default.
• W2947010083 hasVolume "16" @default.
• W2947010083 isParatext "false" @default.
• W2947010083 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W2947010083 magId "2947010083" @default.

• next