FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2947444773> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2947444773 endingPage "969" @default.
• W2947444773 startingPage "943" @default.
• W2947444773 abstract "In the recent years there has been increasing interest in the effects of attentional control on syntactic comprehension, as measured in garden path sentence resolution. Persons with aphasia (PWA) experience greater penalties in garden path sentences compared to language-unimpaired adults but the origin of this deficit remains a controversial issue. One of the possible deficits has been claimed to be disambiguation of lexical cues in the sentence. However, in languages such as English with little morphological variation this connection is hard to establish. To test this hypothesis we used garden path sentences in a morphologically rich language, Greek, where morphological cues may resolve garden path at the lexical level. We further tested whether domain-general attentional control abilities and in particular shifts in attentional control predict garden path resolution in PWA and age- and education-matched controls.This study aimed to determine whether PWA were able to integrate disambiguating morphological (Case) cues while processing garden path sentences. In addition, we tested whether domain-general attentional control and in particular attentional shift from global to local and local to global information (as defined by Navon, 1977) correlates directly with garden path resolution in PWA and healthy controls.Fifteen participants with non-fluent/agrammatic aphasia along with fifteen age- and education-matched language-unimpaired adults performed an online self-paced reading and grammaticality judgment task that included object/subject ambiguous sentences. Syntactic ambiguity was created by the optional transitivity of verbs, while the garden path effect was resolved by morphological Case. The individuals' executive attention skills were tested through an online non-verbal global-local attention shifting task that measured costs stemming from shifting attention from the global to the local level, and vice versa.PWA were slower and more erroneous than controls in integrating Case cues to disambiguate garden path sentences as manifested in the self-paced reading and grammaticality judgment task. In the global local task, PWA exhibited greater global-to-local (vs. local-to-global) attention shifting costs, while controls did not exhibit dissociation. In the regression analysis, garden path resolution in PWA was significantly predicted by global-to-local attention shifting costs, while controls' garden path resolution was significantly predicted by local-to-global attention shift costs.The present study showed for the first time that morphological cues can shed light in sentence comprehension deficits exhibited by PWA. Furthermore, domain-general attentional control abilities were significantly associated with sentence comprehension abilities in both healthy controls and PWA." @default.
• W2947444773 created "2019-06-07" @default.
• W2947444773 creator A5020623639 @default.
• W2947444773 creator A5020832573 @default.
• W2947444773 creator A5062067378 @default.
• W2947444773 creator A5068355811 @default.
• W2947444773 date "2019-05-31" @default.
• W2947444773 modified "2023-10-10" @default.
• W2947444773 title "Effects of executive attention on sentence processing in aphasia" @default.
• W2947444773 cites W1735489737 @default.
• W2947444773 cites W1966576102 @default.
• W2947444773 cites W1968804225 @default.
• W2947444773 cites W1971403573 @default.
• W2947444773 cites W1984100851 @default.
• W2947444773 cites W1985086416 @default.
• W2947444773 cites W1988108189 @default.
• W2947444773 cites W1993837231 @default.
• W2947444773 cites W1995603399 @default.
• W2947444773 cites W2000352808 @default.
• W2947444773 cites W2006555109 @default.
• W2947444773 cites W2010687382 @default.
• W2947444773 cites W2015525744 @default.
• W2947444773 cites W2016967190 @default.
• W2947444773 cites W2018263320 @default.
• W2947444773 cites W2021242263 @default.
• W2947444773 cites W2054092479 @default.
• W2947444773 cites W2060142135 @default.
• W2947444773 cites W2066380143 @default.
• W2947444773 cites W2077117307 @default.
• W2947444773 cites W2077428814 @default.
• W2947444773 cites W2083384085 @default.
• W2947444773 cites W2094735965 @default.
• W2947444773 cites W2101039105 @default.
• W2947444773 cites W2105289241 @default.
• W2947444773 cites W2119150045 @default.
• W2947444773 cites W2125510631 @default.
• W2947444773 cites W2135132052 @default.
• W2947444773 cites W2138618499 @default.
• W2947444773 cites W2153220657 @default.
• W2947444773 cites W2153509446 @default.
• W2947444773 cites W2219686086 @default.
• W2947444773 cites W2346489444 @default.
• W2947444773 cites W2476927623 @default.
• W2947444773 cites W2605206321 @default.
• W2947444773 cites W2765181342 @default.
• W2947444773 doi "https://doi.org/10.1080/02687038.2019.1622647" @default.
• W2947444773 hasPubMedCentralId "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/7500515" @default.
• W2947444773 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32952261" @default.
• W2947444773 hasPublicationYear "2019" @default.
• W2947444773 type Work @default.
• W2947444773 sameAs 2947444773 @default.
• W2947444773 citedByCount "3" @default.
• W2947444773 countsByYear W29474447732021 @default.
• W2947444773 countsByYear W29474447732023 @default.
• W2947444773 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2947444773 hasAuthorship W2947444773A5020623639 @default.
• W2947444773 hasAuthorship W2947444773A5020832573 @default.
• W2947444773 hasAuthorship W2947444773A5062067378 @default.
• W2947444773 hasAuthorship W2947444773A5068355811 @default.
• W2947444773 hasBestOaLocation W29474447732 @default.
• W2947444773 hasConcept C119279833 @default.
• W2947444773 hasConcept C138496976 @default.
• W2947444773 hasConcept C138885662 @default.
• W2947444773 hasConcept C154945302 @default.
• W2947444773 hasConcept C15744967 @default.
• W2947444773 hasConcept C169760540 @default.
• W2947444773 hasConcept C169900460 @default.
• W2947444773 hasConcept C180747234 @default.
• W2947444773 hasConcept C26022165 @default.
• W2947444773 hasConcept C2775924081 @default.
• W2947444773 hasConcept C2777530160 @default.
• W2947444773 hasConcept C2779422653 @default.
• W2947444773 hasConcept C2779525943 @default.
• W2947444773 hasConcept C2780378701 @default.
• W2947444773 hasConcept C41008148 @default.
• W2947444773 hasConcept C41895202 @default.
• W2947444773 hasConcept C511192102 @default.
• W2947444773 hasConceptScore W2947444773C119279833 @default.
• W2947444773 hasConceptScore W2947444773C138496976 @default.
• W2947444773 hasConceptScore W2947444773C138885662 @default.
• W2947444773 hasConceptScore W2947444773C154945302 @default.
• W2947444773 hasConceptScore W2947444773C15744967 @default.
• W2947444773 hasConceptScore W2947444773C169760540 @default.
• W2947444773 hasConceptScore W2947444773C169900460 @default.
• W2947444773 hasConceptScore W2947444773C180747234 @default.
• W2947444773 hasConceptScore W2947444773C26022165 @default.
• W2947444773 hasConceptScore W2947444773C2775924081 @default.
• W2947444773 hasConceptScore W2947444773C2777530160 @default.
• W2947444773 hasConceptScore W2947444773C2779422653 @default.
• W2947444773 hasConceptScore W2947444773C2779525943 @default.
• W2947444773 hasConceptScore W2947444773C2780378701 @default.
• W2947444773 hasConceptScore W2947444773C41008148 @default.
• W2947444773 hasConceptScore W2947444773C41895202 @default.
• W2947444773 hasConceptScore W2947444773C511192102 @default.
• W2947444773 hasIssue "8" @default.
• W2947444773 hasLocation W29474447731 @default.
• W2947444773 hasLocation W29474447732 @default.
• W2947444773 hasLocation W29474447733 @default.

• next