FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2947812004> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2947812004 endingPage "e13717" @default.
• W2947812004 startingPage "e13717" @default.
• W2947812004 abstract "Background There is little research on the application of gamification to mental health and well-being. Furthermore, usage of gamification-related terminology is inconsistent. Current applications of gamification for health and well-being have also been critiqued for adopting a behaviorist approach that relies on positive reinforcement and extrinsic motivators. Objective This study aimed to analyze current applications of gamification for mental health and well-being by answering 3 research questions (RQs). RQ1: which gamification elements are most commonly applied to apps and technologies for improving mental health and well-being? RQ2: which mental health and well-being domains are most commonly targeted by these gamified apps and technologies? RQ3: what reasons do researchers give for applying gamification to these apps and technologies? A systematic review of the literature was conducted to answer these questions. Methods We searched ACM Digital Library, CINAHL, Cochrane Library, EMBASE, IEEE Explore, JMIR, MEDLINE, PsycINFO, PubMed, ScienceDirect, Scopus, and Web of Science for qualifying papers published between the years 2013 and 2018. To answer RQ1 and RQ2, papers were coded for gamification elements and mental health and well-being domains according to existing taxonomies in the game studies and medical literature. During the coding process, it was necessary to adapt our coding frame and revise these taxonomies. Thematic analysis was conducted to answer RQ3. Results The search and screening process identified 70 qualifying papers that collectively reported on 50 apps and technologies. The most commonly observed gamification elements were levels or progress feedback, points or scoring, rewards or prizes, narrative or theme, personalization, and customization; the least commonly observed elements were artificial assistance, unlockable content, social cooperation, exploratory or open-world approach, artificial challenge, and randomness. The most commonly observed mental health and well-being domains were anxiety disorders and well-being, whereas the least commonly observed domains were conduct disorder and bipolar disorders. Researchers’ justification for applying gamification to improving mental health and well-being was coded in 59% (41/70) of the papers and was broadly divided into 2 themes: (1) promoting engagement and (2) enhancing an intervention’s intended effects. Conclusions Our findings suggest that the current application of gamification to apps and technologies for improving mental health and well-being does not align with the trend of positive reinforcement critiqued in the greater health and well-being literature. We also observed overlap between the most commonly used gamification techniques and existing behavior change frameworks. Results also suggest that the application of gamification is not driven by health behavior change theory, and that many researchers may treat gamification as a black box without consideration for its underlying mechanisms. We call for the inclusion of more comprehensive and explicit descriptions of how gamification is applied and the standardization of applied games terminology within and across fields." @default.
• W2947812004 created "2019-06-07" @default.
• W2947812004 creator A5006515544 @default.
• W2947812004 creator A5024222363 @default.
• W2947812004 creator A5037088205 @default.
• W2947812004 creator A5069078473 @default.
• W2947812004 creator A5070503301 @default.
• W2947812004 date "2019-06-26" @default.
• W2947812004 modified "2023-10-16" @default.
• W2947812004 title "Gamification in Apps and Technologies for Improving Mental Health and Well-Being: Systematic Review" @default.
• W2947812004 cites W1410719325 @default.
• W2947812004 cites W1567103855 @default.
• W2947812004 cites W1936508772 @default.
• W2947812004 cites W1967591898 @default.
• W2947812004 cites W1979290264 @default.
• W2947812004 cites W1990318489 @default.
• W2947812004 cites W2009546847 @default.
• W2947812004 cites W2012969272 @default.
• W2947812004 cites W2023062420 @default.
• W2947812004 cites W2031924389 @default.
• W2947812004 cites W2037416608 @default.
• W2947812004 cites W2046874805 @default.
• W2947812004 cites W2057181385 @default.
• W2947812004 cites W2081655353 @default.
• W2947812004 cites W2112786892 @default.
• W2947812004 cites W2121188597 @default.
• W2947812004 cites W2125071906 @default.
• W2947812004 cites W2129887445 @default.
• W2947812004 cites W2136608905 @default.
• W2947812004 cites W2159253324 @default.
• W2947812004 cites W2164665633 @default.
• W2947812004 cites W2278135413 @default.
• W2947812004 cites W2289545039 @default.
• W2947812004 cites W2292607427 @default.
• W2947812004 cites W2341756679 @default.
• W2947812004 cites W2470783774 @default.
• W2947812004 cites W2479485957 @default.
• W2947812004 cites W2509863006 @default.
• W2947812004 cites W2513068937 @default.
• W2947812004 cites W2528385426 @default.
• W2947812004 cites W2547134104 @default.
• W2947812004 cites W2558472964 @default.
• W2947812004 cites W2571493223 @default.
• W2947812004 cites W2594386612 @default.
• W2947812004 cites W2616609740 @default.
• W2947812004 cites W2622215049 @default.
• W2947812004 cites W2725890240 @default.
• W2947812004 cites W2761819867 @default.
• W2947812004 cites W2772065767 @default.
• W2947812004 cites W2781979211 @default.
• W2947812004 cites W2785360246 @default.
• W2947812004 cites W2793828316 @default.
• W2947812004 cites W2795863578 @default.
• W2947812004 cites W2799305467 @default.
• W2947812004 cites W2804686563 @default.
• W2947812004 cites W2885892712 @default.
• W2947812004 cites W2886284872 @default.
• W2947812004 cites W2890428821 @default.
• W2947812004 doi "https://doi.org/10.2196/13717" @default.
• W2947812004 hasPubMedCentralId "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/6617915" @default.
• W2947812004 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/31244479" @default.
• W2947812004 hasPublicationYear "2019" @default.
• W2947812004 type Work @default.
• W2947812004 sameAs 2947812004 @default.
• W2947812004 citedByCount "114" @default.
• W2947812004 countsByYear W29478120042019 @default.
• W2947812004 countsByYear W29478120042020 @default.
• W2947812004 countsByYear W29478120042021 @default.
• W2947812004 countsByYear W29478120042022 @default.
• W2947812004 countsByYear W29478120042023 @default.
• W2947812004 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2947812004 hasAuthorship W2947812004A5006515544 @default.
• W2947812004 hasAuthorship W2947812004A5024222363 @default.
• W2947812004 hasAuthorship W2947812004A5037088205 @default.
• W2947812004 hasAuthorship W2947812004A5069078473 @default.
• W2947812004 hasAuthorship W2947812004A5070503301 @default.
• W2947812004 hasBestOaLocation W29478120041 @default.
• W2947812004 hasConcept C118552586 @default.
• W2947812004 hasConcept C126322002 @default.
• W2947812004 hasConcept C134362201 @default.
• W2947812004 hasConcept C138816342 @default.
• W2947812004 hasConcept C145642194 @default.
• W2947812004 hasConcept C15744967 @default.
• W2947812004 hasConcept C159110408 @default.
• W2947812004 hasConcept C17744445 @default.
• W2947812004 hasConcept C189708586 @default.
• W2947812004 hasConcept C199539241 @default.
• W2947812004 hasConcept C27415008 @default.
• W2947812004 hasConcept C2776478404 @default.
• W2947812004 hasConcept C2779473830 @default.
• W2947812004 hasConcept C2779549880 @default.
• W2947812004 hasConcept C2781145037 @default.
• W2947812004 hasConcept C41008148 @default.
• W2947812004 hasConcept C509550671 @default.
• W2947812004 hasConcept C542102704 @default.
• W2947812004 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W2947812004 hasConcept C75630572 @default.
• W2947812004 hasConcept C83867959 @default.

• next