FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2947950382> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2947950382 endingPage "947" @default.
• W2947950382 startingPage "943" @default.
• W2947950382 abstract "Purpose To evaluate the possible associations between the single-layer locked- and unlocked-uterine closure technique and closure area biometry, and cesarean scar healing in recurrent cesarean section.Material and methods In this randomized prospective study, elective second cesarean section of 120 singleton pregnant women were randomized into the single-layer locked- and unlocked-continuous uterus closure technique. During the operation, the upper and lower edge thickness of the uterine incision were measured. In order to evaluate the healing in the cesarean scar area, all women were examined with vaginal ultrasonography 6–8 months after the cesarean section. The possible associations between locked- and unlocked-uterine closure technique and closure area biometry and cesarean scar healing were evaluated.Results After the drop-outs, a total of 86 women, 45 in the locked-continuous closure group and 41 in the unlocked-continuous closure group were evaluated. There was no statistically significant difference between the groups in terms of demographic and clinical parameters, such as perioperative uterine closure area biometry, need for additional suture, duration of operation and amount of bleeding. However, a significantly greater number of additional sutures for hemostasis was necessary in the unlocked-continuous compared to the locked-continuous closure group. The rate of cesarean scar defect (CSD) and residual myometrium thickness were comparable whereas the healing rate was significantly higher in the locked-continuous closure group compared to the unlocked-continuous closure group (0.71 ± 0.90 vs. 0.64 ± 0.10, p = .032). In women with CSD, the lower edge was 4 mm thinner than the women without CSD (10.48 ± 6.13 mm vs. 14.53 ± 7.13 mm, p = .006). Moreover, the thickness difference between the lower and upper edge was significantly greater if CSD was present compared to the absence of CSD (5.88 ± 4.04 mm vs. 3.70 ± 3.00 mm, p = .006).Conclusions There was no association between CSD and locked versus unlocked suture technique used for the closure of uterine incision in the second cesarean section. The biometric evaluation of the scar area has shown that the thin lower wound edge and unevenness between the lower and the upper wound edges may play a role in incomplete healing of the uterine incision." @default.
• W2947950382 created "2019-06-07" @default.
• W2947950382 creator A5005921989 @default.
• W2947950382 creator A5021302291 @default.
• W2947950382 creator A5022099813 @default.
• W2947950382 creator A5023300114 @default.
• W2947950382 creator A5045939864 @default.
• W2947950382 creator A5067886807 @default.
• W2947950382 date "2019-05-30" @default.
• W2947950382 modified "2023-10-17" @default.
• W2947950382 title "Incomplete healing of the uterine incision after elective second cesarean section" @default.
• W2947950382 cites W1889078410 @default.
• W2947950382 cites W1990221356 @default.
• W2947950382 cites W2000224597 @default.
• W2947950382 cites W2004678477 @default.
• W2947950382 cites W2012693910 @default.
• W2947950382 cites W2018267420 @default.
• W2947950382 cites W2020012714 @default.
• W2947950382 cites W2043676706 @default.
• W2947950382 cites W2087168157 @default.
• W2947950382 cites W2088438003 @default.
• W2947950382 cites W2103895709 @default.
• W2947950382 cites W2105807384 @default.
• W2947950382 cites W2107286738 @default.
• W2947950382 cites W2107540456 @default.
• W2947950382 cites W2125441360 @default.
• W2947950382 cites W2147194424 @default.
• W2947950382 cites W2570998989 @default.
• W2947950382 cites W2623600558 @default.
• W2947950382 cites W2745582371 @default.
• W2947950382 cites W2806589032 @default.
• W2947950382 cites W4237677486 @default.
• W2947950382 cites W4243062986 @default.
• W2947950382 doi "https://doi.org/10.1080/14767058.2019.1622676" @default.
• W2947950382 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/31146610" @default.
• W2947950382 hasPublicationYear "2019" @default.
• W2947950382 type Work @default.
• W2947950382 sameAs 2947950382 @default.
• W2947950382 citedByCount "3" @default.
• W2947950382 countsByYear W29479503822022 @default.
• W2947950382 countsByYear W29479503822023 @default.
• W2947950382 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2947950382 hasAuthorship W2947950382A5005921989 @default.
• W2947950382 hasAuthorship W2947950382A5021302291 @default.
• W2947950382 hasAuthorship W2947950382A5022099813 @default.
• W2947950382 hasAuthorship W2947950382A5023300114 @default.
• W2947950382 hasAuthorship W2947950382A5045939864 @default.
• W2947950382 hasAuthorship W2947950382A5067886807 @default.
• W2947950382 hasConcept C141071460 @default.
• W2947950382 hasConcept C2777327002 @default.
• W2947950382 hasConcept C31174226 @default.
• W2947950382 hasConcept C42219234 @default.
• W2947950382 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W2947950382 hasConceptScore W2947950382C141071460 @default.
• W2947950382 hasConceptScore W2947950382C2777327002 @default.
• W2947950382 hasConceptScore W2947950382C31174226 @default.
• W2947950382 hasConceptScore W2947950382C42219234 @default.
• W2947950382 hasConceptScore W2947950382C71924100 @default.
• W2947950382 hasIssue "6" @default.
• W2947950382 hasLocation W29479503821 @default.
• W2947950382 hasOpenAccess W2947950382 @default.
• W2947950382 hasPrimaryLocation W29479503821 @default.
• W2947950382 hasRelatedWork W1506200166 @default.
• W2947950382 hasRelatedWork W1995515455 @default.
• W2947950382 hasRelatedWork W2048182022 @default.
• W2947950382 hasRelatedWork W2080531066 @default.
• W2947950382 hasRelatedWork W2604872355 @default.
• W2947950382 hasRelatedWork W2748952813 @default.
• W2947950382 hasRelatedWork W2899084033 @default.
• W2947950382 hasRelatedWork W3031052312 @default.
• W2947950382 hasRelatedWork W3032375762 @default.
• W2947950382 hasRelatedWork W3108674512 @default.
• W2947950382 hasVolume "34" @default.
• W2947950382 isParatext "false" @default.
• W2947950382 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W2947950382 magId "2947950382" @default.
• W2947950382 workType "article" @default.