FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2948528372> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2948528372 endingPage "318" @default.
• W2948528372 startingPage "311" @default.
• W2948528372 abstract "Background There is lack of consensus regarding the use of breast MRI for routine surveillance for second breast cancer events in women with a personal history of breast cancer. Purpose To compare performance of surveillance mammography with breast MRI. Materials and Methods This observational cohort study used prospectively collected data and included 13 266 women age 18 years and older (mean age, 60 years ± 13) with stage 0–III breast cancer who underwent 33 938 mammographic examinations and 2506 breast MRI examinations from 2005 to 2012 in the Breast Cancer Surveillance Consortium. Women were categorized into two groups: mammography alone (n = 11 745) or breast MRI (n = 1521). Performance measures were calculated by using end-of-day assessment and occurrence of second breast cancer events within 1 year of imaging. Logistic regression was used to compare performance for breast MRI versus mammography alone, adjusting for women, examination, and primary breast cancer characteristics. Analysis was conducted on a per-examination basis. Results Breast MRI was associated with younger age at diagnosis, chemotherapy, and higher education and income. Raw performance measures for breast MRI versus mammography were as follows, respectively: cancer detection rates, 10.8 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 6.7, 14.8) versus 8.2 (95% CI: 7.3, 9.2) per 1000 examinations; sensitivity, 61.4% (27 of 44; 95% CI: 46.5%, 76.2%) versus 70.3% (279 of 397; 95% CI: 65.8%, 74.8%); and biopsy rate, 10.1% (253 of 2506; 95% CI: 8.9%, 11.3%) versus 4.0% (1343 of 33 938; 95% CI: 3.7%, 4.2%). In multivariable models, breast MRI was associated with higher biopsy rate (odds ratio [OR], 2.2; 95% CI: 1.9, 2.7; P < .001) and cancer detection rate (OR, 1.7; 95% CI: 1.1, 2.7; P = .03) than mammography alone. However, there were no differences in sensitivity (OR, 1.1; 95% CI: 0.4, 2.9; P = .84) or interval cancer rate (OR, 1.1; 95% CI: 0.6, 2.2; P = .70). Conclusion Comparison of the performance of surveillance breast MRI with mammography must account for patient characteristics. Whereas breast MRI leads to higher biopsy and cancer detection rates, there were no significant differences in sensitivity or interval cancers compared with mammography. © RSNA, 2019 Online supplemental material is available for this article. See also the editorial by Newell in this issue." @default.
• W2948528372 created "2019-06-14" @default.
• W2948528372 creator A5001077788 @default.
• W2948528372 creator A5001530469 @default.
• W2948528372 creator A5004918315 @default.
• W2948528372 creator A5008335692 @default.
• W2948528372 creator A5020615352 @default.
• W2948528372 creator A5029752677 @default.
• W2948528372 creator A5034788914 @default.
• W2948528372 creator A5049271778 @default.
• W2948528372 creator A5050357899 @default.
• W2948528372 creator A5069592105 @default.
• W2948528372 creator A5075750233 @default.
• W2948528372 creator A5077710776 @default.
• W2948528372 creator A5085257013 @default.
• W2948528372 creator A5087244073 @default.
• W2948528372 date "2019-08-01" @default.
• W2948528372 modified "2023-10-18" @default.
• W2948528372 title "Surveillance Breast MRI and Mammography: Comparison in Women with a Personal History of Breast Cancer" @default.
• W2948528372 cites W1858836658 @default.
• W2948528372 cites W1989289006 @default.
• W2948528372 cites W2044114600 @default.
• W2948528372 cites W2044513722 @default.
• W2948528372 cites W2061411194 @default.
• W2948528372 cites W2062594082 @default.
• W2948528372 cites W2080749309 @default.
• W2948528372 cites W2098446709 @default.
• W2948528372 cites W2098945202 @default.
• W2948528372 cites W2103327180 @default.
• W2948528372 cites W2111092438 @default.
• W2948528372 cites W2111100627 @default.
• W2948528372 cites W2124653673 @default.
• W2948528372 cites W2130684802 @default.
• W2948528372 cites W2143037181 @default.
• W2948528372 cites W2148516878 @default.
• W2948528372 cites W2149860264 @default.
• W2948528372 cites W2150354607 @default.
• W2948528372 cites W2156795189 @default.
• W2948528372 cites W2191632272 @default.
• W2948528372 cites W2207721691 @default.
• W2948528372 cites W2237958539 @default.
• W2948528372 cites W2514309256 @default.
• W2948528372 cites W2560617851 @default.
• W2948528372 cites W2573593257 @default.
• W2948528372 cites W2585787347 @default.
• W2948528372 cites W2623786136 @default.
• W2948528372 cites W2644595080 @default.
• W2948528372 cites W2783194010 @default.
• W2948528372 cites W2792931869 @default.
• W2948528372 cites W4294553991 @default.
• W2948528372 cites W4297820480 @default.
• W2948528372 cites W786176465 @default.
• W2948528372 doi "https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.2019182475" @default.
• W2948528372 hasPubMedCentralId "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/6694722" @default.
• W2948528372 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/31161975" @default.
• W2948528372 hasPublicationYear "2019" @default.
• W2948528372 type Work @default.
• W2948528372 sameAs 2948528372 @default.
• W2948528372 citedByCount "42" @default.
• W2948528372 countsByYear W29485283722019 @default.
• W2948528372 countsByYear W29485283722020 @default.
• W2948528372 countsByYear W29485283722021 @default.
• W2948528372 countsByYear W29485283722022 @default.
• W2948528372 countsByYear W29485283722023 @default.
• W2948528372 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2948528372 hasAuthorship W2948528372A5001077788 @default.
• W2948528372 hasAuthorship W2948528372A5001530469 @default.
• W2948528372 hasAuthorship W2948528372A5004918315 @default.
• W2948528372 hasAuthorship W2948528372A5008335692 @default.
• W2948528372 hasAuthorship W2948528372A5020615352 @default.
• W2948528372 hasAuthorship W2948528372A5029752677 @default.
• W2948528372 hasAuthorship W2948528372A5034788914 @default.
• W2948528372 hasAuthorship W2948528372A5049271778 @default.
• W2948528372 hasAuthorship W2948528372A5050357899 @default.
• W2948528372 hasAuthorship W2948528372A5069592105 @default.
• W2948528372 hasAuthorship W2948528372A5075750233 @default.
• W2948528372 hasAuthorship W2948528372A5077710776 @default.
• W2948528372 hasAuthorship W2948528372A5085257013 @default.
• W2948528372 hasAuthorship W2948528372A5087244073 @default.
• W2948528372 hasBestOaLocation W29485283721 @default.
• W2948528372 hasConcept C121608353 @default.
• W2948528372 hasConcept C126322002 @default.
• W2948528372 hasConcept C126838900 @default.
• W2948528372 hasConcept C151956035 @default.
• W2948528372 hasConcept C201903717 @default.
• W2948528372 hasConcept C2777111374 @default.
• W2948528372 hasConcept C2777432617 @default.
• W2948528372 hasConcept C2780472235 @default.
• W2948528372 hasConcept C29456083 @default.
• W2948528372 hasConcept C44249647 @default.
• W2948528372 hasConcept C530470458 @default.
• W2948528372 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W2948528372 hasConceptScore W2948528372C121608353 @default.
• W2948528372 hasConceptScore W2948528372C126322002 @default.
• W2948528372 hasConceptScore W2948528372C126838900 @default.
• W2948528372 hasConceptScore W2948528372C151956035 @default.
• W2948528372 hasConceptScore W2948528372C201903717 @default.
• W2948528372 hasConceptScore W2948528372C2777111374 @default.

• next