FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2948693419> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2948693419 endingPage "1093" @default.
• W2948693419 startingPage "1087" @default.
• W2948693419 abstract "Computed tomography (CT) imaging has traditionally been considered the gold standard for evaluation of syndesmostic reduction, but there is no uniformly accepted method to assess reduction. The aim of this study was to evaluate the intra- and interobserver reliability of published measurement techniques for evaluation of syndesmotic reduction on weightbearing CT scan (WBCT) in hopes of determining which method is best.Medical records were reviewed to identify patients who underwent operative stabilization of unilateral syndesmotic injuries. Exclusion criteria included patients younger than 18 years, ipsilateral fractures extending to the tibial plafond, any contralateral ankle fracture or syndesmotic injury, and body mass index greater than 40 kg/m2. Twenty eligible patients underwent WBCT evaluation of both ankles at an average of 3 years after syndesmotic fixation. The anatomic accuracy of syndesmotic reduction was evaluated by 2 observers using axial CT images at a level 1 cm proximal to the tibial plafond using 9 previously published radiological measurement techniques. Inter- and intraobserver reliability were assessed for each evaluation method.The syndesmotic area calculation showed the highest interobserver reliability (0.96), the highest intraobserver reliability for observer 2 (0.97), and the second highest intraobserver reliability for observer 1 (0.92). Fibular rotation had the second highest interobserver reliability in our results (0.84), with intraobserver reliability of 0.91 and 0.8 for first and second observers, respectively. The intraobserver reliability of the side-by-side method was 0.49 and 0.24 for the first and second observers, respectively, and the interobserver reliability was 0.26.Qualitatively assessing syndesmotic reduction via side-by-side comparison with the uninjured ankle had the least intra- and interobserver reliability and should not be relied on to determine syndesmotic reduction quality. In contradistinction, syndesmotic area calculation demonstrated the highest reliability when evaluating syndesmotic reduction, followed by fibular rotation. Given that syndesmotic area measurement techniques are not readily available on standard image viewers, technologically updating image viewers to allow such calculation would make this approach more accessible in clinical practice.Level IV, case series." @default.
• W2948693419 created "2019-06-14" @default.
• W2948693419 creator A5035683798 @default.
• W2948693419 creator A5037796270 @default.
• W2948693419 creator A5053318254 @default.
• W2948693419 creator A5060901257 @default.
• W2948693419 creator A5063442682 @default.
• W2948693419 creator A5078890008 @default.
• W2948693419 date "2019-06-04" @default.
• W2948693419 modified "2023-10-02" @default.
• W2948693419 title "Evaluation of Syndesmosis Reduction on CT Scan" @default.
• W2948693419 cites W1965768141 @default.
• W2948693419 cites W1990173828 @default.
• W2948693419 cites W1999339393 @default.
• W2948693419 cites W2014432636 @default.
• W2948693419 cites W2018628553 @default.
• W2948693419 cites W2018963114 @default.
• W2948693419 cites W2040200987 @default.
• W2948693419 cites W2045177870 @default.
• W2948693419 cites W2048953272 @default.
• W2948693419 cites W2049830942 @default.
• W2948693419 cites W2051155587 @default.
• W2948693419 cites W2060736347 @default.
• W2948693419 cites W2119310450 @default.
• W2948693419 cites W2119476599 @default.
• W2948693419 cites W2124451810 @default.
• W2948693419 cites W2140927451 @default.
• W2948693419 cites W2193810652 @default.
• W2948693419 cites W2278118136 @default.
• W2948693419 cites W2313466331 @default.
• W2948693419 cites W2328389688 @default.
• W2948693419 cites W2344588794 @default.
• W2948693419 cites W2516526110 @default.
• W2948693419 cites W2533241739 @default.
• W2948693419 cites W2588715353 @default.
• W2948693419 cites W2589288837 @default.
• W2948693419 cites W2888596817 @default.
• W2948693419 doi "https://doi.org/10.1177/1071100719849850" @default.
• W2948693419 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/31161809" @default.
• W2948693419 hasPublicationYear "2019" @default.
• W2948693419 type Work @default.
• W2948693419 sameAs 2948693419 @default.
• W2948693419 citedByCount "31" @default.
• W2948693419 countsByYear W29486934192020 @default.
• W2948693419 countsByYear W29486934192021 @default.
• W2948693419 countsByYear W29486934192022 @default.
• W2948693419 countsByYear W29486934192023 @default.
• W2948693419 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2948693419 hasAuthorship W2948693419A5035683798 @default.
• W2948693419 hasAuthorship W2948693419A5037796270 @default.
• W2948693419 hasAuthorship W2948693419A5053318254 @default.
• W2948693419 hasAuthorship W2948693419A5060901257 @default.
• W2948693419 hasAuthorship W2948693419A5063442682 @default.
• W2948693419 hasAuthorship W2948693419A5078890008 @default.
• W2948693419 hasConcept C106207104 @default.
• W2948693419 hasConcept C111335779 @default.
• W2948693419 hasConcept C121332964 @default.
• W2948693419 hasConcept C126838900 @default.
• W2948693419 hasConcept C141071460 @default.
• W2948693419 hasConcept C146249460 @default.
• W2948693419 hasConcept C163258240 @default.
• W2948693419 hasConcept C190892606 @default.
• W2948693419 hasConcept C2524010 @default.
• W2948693419 hasConcept C2777236700 @default.
• W2948693419 hasConcept C2778640784 @default.
• W2948693419 hasConcept C2780776439 @default.
• W2948693419 hasConcept C2908647359 @default.
• W2948693419 hasConcept C29694066 @default.
• W2948693419 hasConcept C2989005 @default.
• W2948693419 hasConcept C33923547 @default.
• W2948693419 hasConcept C40993552 @default.
• W2948693419 hasConcept C43214815 @default.
• W2948693419 hasConcept C62520636 @default.
• W2948693419 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W2948693419 hasConcept C99454951 @default.
• W2948693419 hasConceptScore W2948693419C106207104 @default.
• W2948693419 hasConceptScore W2948693419C111335779 @default.
• W2948693419 hasConceptScore W2948693419C121332964 @default.
• W2948693419 hasConceptScore W2948693419C126838900 @default.
• W2948693419 hasConceptScore W2948693419C141071460 @default.
• W2948693419 hasConceptScore W2948693419C146249460 @default.
• W2948693419 hasConceptScore W2948693419C163258240 @default.
• W2948693419 hasConceptScore W2948693419C190892606 @default.
• W2948693419 hasConceptScore W2948693419C2524010 @default.
• W2948693419 hasConceptScore W2948693419C2777236700 @default.
• W2948693419 hasConceptScore W2948693419C2778640784 @default.
• W2948693419 hasConceptScore W2948693419C2780776439 @default.
• W2948693419 hasConceptScore W2948693419C2908647359 @default.
• W2948693419 hasConceptScore W2948693419C29694066 @default.
• W2948693419 hasConceptScore W2948693419C2989005 @default.
• W2948693419 hasConceptScore W2948693419C33923547 @default.
• W2948693419 hasConceptScore W2948693419C40993552 @default.
• W2948693419 hasConceptScore W2948693419C43214815 @default.
• W2948693419 hasConceptScore W2948693419C62520636 @default.
• W2948693419 hasConceptScore W2948693419C71924100 @default.
• W2948693419 hasConceptScore W2948693419C99454951 @default.
• W2948693419 hasFunder F4320321654 @default.
• W2948693419 hasIssue "9" @default.

• next