FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2949379172> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2949379172 endingPage "e13997" @default.
• W2949379172 startingPage "e13997" @default.
• W2949379172 abstract "Microlearning, the acquisition of knowledge or skills in the form of small units, is endorsed by health professions educators as a means of facilitating student learning, training, and continuing education, but it is difficult to define in terms of its features and outcomes.This review aimed to conduct a systematic search of the literature on microlearning in health professions education to identify key concepts, characterize microlearning as an educational strategy, and evaluate pedagogical outcomes experienced by health professions students.A scoping review was performed using the bibliographic databases PubMed (MEDLINE), CINAHL, Education Resources Information Center, EMBASE, PsycINFO, Education Full Text (HW Wilson), and ProQuest Dissertations and Theses Global. A combination of keywords and subject headings related to microlearning, electronic learning, or just-in-time learning combined with health professions education was used. No date limits were placed on the search, but inclusion was limited to materials published in English. Pedagogical outcomes were evaluated according to the 4-level Kirkpatrick model.A total of 3096 references were retrieved, of which 17 articles were selected after applying the inclusion and exclusion criteria. Articles that met the criteria were published between 2011 and 2018, and their authors were from a range of countries, including the United States, China, India, Australia, Canada, Iran, Netherlands, Taiwan, and the United Kingdom. The 17 studies reviewed included various health-related disciplines, such as medicine, nursing, pharmacy, dentistry, and allied health. Although microlearning appeared in a variety of subject areas, different technologies, such as podcast, short messaging service, microblogging, and social networking service, were also used. On the basis of Buchem and Hamelmann's 10 microlearning concepts, each study satisfied at least 40% of the characteristics, whereas all studies featured concepts of maximum time spent less than 15 min as well as content aggregation. According to our assessment of each article using the Kirkpatrick model, 94% (16/17) assessed student reactions to the microlearning (level 1), 82% (14/17) evaluated knowledge or skill acquisition (level 2), 29% (5/17) measured the effect of the microlearning on student behavior (level 3), and no studies were found at the highest level.Microlearning as an educational strategy has demonstrated a positive effect on the knowledge and confidence of health professions students in performing procedures, retaining knowledge, studying, and engaging in collaborative learning. However, downsides to microlearning include pedagogical discomfort, technology inequalities, and privacy concerns. Future research should look at higher-level outcomes, including benefits to patients or practice changes. The findings of this scoping review will inform education researchers, faculty, and academic administrators on the application of microlearning, pinpoint gaps in the literature, and help identify opportunities for instructional designers and subject matter experts to improve course content in didactic and clinical settings." @default.
• W2949379172 created "2019-06-27" @default.
• W2949379172 creator A5004483055 @default.
• W2949379172 creator A5025873467 @default.
• W2949379172 creator A5045203074 @default.
• W2949379172 creator A5054777829 @default.
• W2949379172 creator A5070353502 @default.
• W2949379172 creator A5077233835 @default.
• W2949379172 date "2019-07-23" @default.
• W2949379172 modified "2023-10-18" @default.
• W2949379172 title "Microlearning in Health Professions Education: Scoping Review" @default.
• W2949379172 cites W1140332532 @default.
• W2949379172 cites W1971876491 @default.
• W2949379172 cites W1984821133 @default.
• W2949379172 cites W2008173117 @default.
• W2949379172 cites W2017725527 @default.
• W2949379172 cites W2028041800 @default.
• W2949379172 cites W2069080391 @default.
• W2949379172 cites W2075950485 @default.
• W2949379172 cites W2105353665 @default.
• W2949379172 cites W2113140482 @default.
• W2949379172 cites W2138294124 @default.
• W2949379172 cites W2143252620 @default.
• W2949379172 cites W2161356685 @default.
• W2949379172 cites W2170094446 @default.
• W2949379172 cites W2310012345 @default.
• W2949379172 cites W2323449023 @default.
• W2949379172 cites W2323590388 @default.
• W2949379172 cites W2326239949 @default.
• W2949379172 cites W2329309544 @default.
• W2949379172 cites W2408667333 @default.
• W2949379172 cites W2430139996 @default.
• W2949379172 cites W2520609142 @default.
• W2949379172 cites W2522242191 @default.
• W2949379172 cites W2611799259 @default.
• W2949379172 cites W2624035588 @default.
• W2949379172 cites W2651878796 @default.
• W2949379172 cites W2754495424 @default.
• W2949379172 cites W2755365308 @default.
• W2949379172 cites W2756149177 @default.
• W2949379172 cites W2791673703 @default.
• W2949379172 cites W2794061542 @default.
• W2949379172 cites W2886819360 @default.
• W2949379172 cites W2891378911 @default.
• W2949379172 cites W2903251702 @default.
• W2949379172 cites W2904963243 @default.
• W2949379172 cites W2908210809 @default.
• W2949379172 cites W2915321236 @default.
• W2949379172 cites W4233344291 @default.
• W2949379172 cites W4234506655 @default.
• W2949379172 cites W4238538096 @default.
• W2949379172 doi "https://doi.org/10.2196/13997" @default.
• W2949379172 hasPubMedCentralId "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/6683654" @default.
• W2949379172 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/31339105" @default.
• W2949379172 hasPublicationYear "2019" @default.
• W2949379172 type Work @default.
• W2949379172 sameAs 2949379172 @default.
• W2949379172 citedByCount "81" @default.
• W2949379172 countsByYear W29493791722019 @default.
• W2949379172 countsByYear W29493791722020 @default.
• W2949379172 countsByYear W29493791722021 @default.
• W2949379172 countsByYear W29493791722022 @default.
• W2949379172 countsByYear W29493791722023 @default.
• W2949379172 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2949379172 hasAuthorship W2949379172A5004483055 @default.
• W2949379172 hasAuthorship W2949379172A5025873467 @default.
• W2949379172 hasAuthorship W2949379172A5045203074 @default.
• W2949379172 hasAuthorship W2949379172A5054777829 @default.
• W2949379172 hasAuthorship W2949379172A5070353502 @default.
• W2949379172 hasAuthorship W2949379172A5077233835 @default.
• W2949379172 hasBestOaLocation W29493791721 @default.
• W2949379172 hasConcept C109359841 @default.
• W2949379172 hasConcept C15744967 @default.
• W2949379172 hasConcept C159110408 @default.
• W2949379172 hasConcept C160735492 @default.
• W2949379172 hasConcept C161191863 @default.
• W2949379172 hasConcept C17744445 @default.
• W2949379172 hasConcept C199539241 @default.
• W2949379172 hasConcept C27415008 @default.
• W2949379172 hasConcept C2777855551 @default.
• W2949379172 hasConcept C2779473830 @default.
• W2949379172 hasConcept C2779549880 @default.
• W2949379172 hasConcept C2779557268 @default.
• W2949379172 hasConcept C2781145037 @default.
• W2949379172 hasConcept C41008148 @default.
• W2949379172 hasConcept C509550671 @default.
• W2949379172 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W2949379172 hasConcept C77805123 @default.
• W2949379172 hasConceptScore W2949379172C109359841 @default.
• W2949379172 hasConceptScore W2949379172C15744967 @default.
• W2949379172 hasConceptScore W2949379172C159110408 @default.
• W2949379172 hasConceptScore W2949379172C160735492 @default.
• W2949379172 hasConceptScore W2949379172C161191863 @default.
• W2949379172 hasConceptScore W2949379172C17744445 @default.
• W2949379172 hasConceptScore W2949379172C199539241 @default.
• W2949379172 hasConceptScore W2949379172C27415008 @default.
• W2949379172 hasConceptScore W2949379172C2777855551 @default.
• W2949379172 hasConceptScore W2949379172C2779473830 @default.

• next