FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2949440898> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2949440898 abstract "The terrains of Poland, located north of the Carpathians and the Sudetes, have been almost completely abandoned during the period of the LGM sensustricte. The reoccupation of Polish territories took place not until the end of LGM. These areas were then settled by the societies of the Magdalenian complex – a tradition that included upland areas of Western and Central Europe. On the basis of today's state of knowledge, it can be concluded that the eastern borders of Poland are at the same time the eastern boundary of the Magdalenien settlement. Five Magdalenian sites from the areas of today's Podkarpackie Voivodship are known (fig. 1). In the 1940s, a single-row harpoon linked to Magdalenian was found in Przemyśl. Further discoveries of sites fall into the turn of the 20th and 21st centuries. Four of the mhave been discovered up to this day: in Hłomcza, Grodzisko Dolne, Wierzawice and Łąka. This sites are only short-lived campsprovided small inventories. So far, no traces of large, longer settled base camp types have been found. If this situation is not only the result of the current state of research, then it may suggest that the areas of south-eastern Poland were part of a larger territory exploited by some Magdalenian community. On the basis of the analysis, it may be assumed that this territory may have covered the areas of eastern Poland. Magdalenian settlement in eastern Poland continues throughout the presence of Late Magdalenian societies in Central Europe, from Dryas I to Alleröd. It means that the population, or traditions of this culture, reached the eastern periphery relatively quickly and for a long time. The question arises if the Magdalenian population, functioning in the eastern borderlands, occupied areas not covered by any previous settlement, and whether were there contacts between them and representatives of other traditions – Epigravettian, whose settlement extends east of today's Polish borders on the territory of Ukraine. Finally, the last question is whether the line of the San is the final eastern limit of Magdalenian. This last question should be answered in the affirmatively, though not categorically. So far, we do not know of any Magdalenian sites from the areas east of Poland. The answer to the remaining questions is difficult. A certain light is being shed on them by the discovery of the site in Święte. The part of the site studied so far provided a small concentration of lithic artefacts – flakes and blades as well as several tools. These materials were described as Epigravettian. The TL dates obtained from the profile indicate that it is contemporary to the Magdalenian settlement. Perhaps, therefore the Magdalenian population who came to this area inhabited the areas that were occupied by the “Epigravettian” population? Perhaps we are also dealing with a zone penetrated by both these communities? So far, we know only one Epigravettian site from this area, which is contemporary to the Magdalenian settlement, but its significance in the discussion of Magdalenien-Epigravettian relations is very important. To what extent this borderland was the area of contacts and what the consequences could have been is unexplained yet. Apart from the few possible imports of Volhynian flint in Magdalenian inventories (Wierzawice, Grodzisko Dolne?), there are no other elements that could be a material confirmation of such contacts. An in-depth analysis of possible contacts on the west-east axis is also hindered by the poor level of recognition of the Polish-Ukrainian borderland on the Ukrainian side. Research conducted in the south-east of Poland shows that the Polish-Ukrainian borderland is an important area through which the border between two cultural traditions passes at the beginning of the Late Pleistocene. This is an extremely important area in discussion on the relationship between Magdalenian and Epigravettian. Today's knowledge and questions set the prospects for further work. Key words: Epigravettian, Magdalenian, Upper Paleolithic, South-Eastern Poland, Polish-Ukrainian borderland, cultural contacts, imports." @default.
• W2949440898 created "2019-06-27" @default.
• W2949440898 creator A5014588856 @default.
• W2949440898 creator A5033442729 @default.
• W2949440898 date "2018-12-11" @default.
• W2949440898 modified "2023-09-24" @default.
• W2949440898 title "BETWEEN MAGDALENIAN AND EPIGRAVETTIAN. A CONTRIBUTION TO THE STUDY OF THE PALAEOLITHIC ON THE POLISH-UKRAINIAN BORDER" @default.
• W2949440898 cites W1973783425 @default.
• W2949440898 cites W1973805865 @default.
• W2949440898 cites W2084850150 @default.
• W2949440898 cites W2484534170 @default.
• W2949440898 cites W2550753007 @default.
• W2949440898 cites W2614516141 @default.
• W2949440898 cites W2891515768 @default.
• W2949440898 doi "https://doi.org/10.33402/mdapv.2018-22-42-53" @default.
• W2949440898 hasPublicationYear "2018" @default.
• W2949440898 type Work @default.
• W2949440898 sameAs 2949440898 @default.
• W2949440898 citedByCount "1" @default.
• W2949440898 countsByYear W29494408982022 @default.
• W2949440898 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2949440898 hasAuthorship W2949440898A5014588856 @default.
• W2949440898 hasAuthorship W2949440898A5033442729 @default.
• W2949440898 hasBestOaLocation W29494408981 @default.
• W2949440898 hasConcept C138885662 @default.
• W2949440898 hasConcept C166957645 @default.
• W2949440898 hasConcept C171878925 @default.
• W2949440898 hasConcept C205649164 @default.
• W2949440898 hasConcept C21931767 @default.
• W2949440898 hasConcept C2776549017 @default.
• W2949440898 hasConcept C41895202 @default.
• W2949440898 hasConcept C95457728 @default.
• W2949440898 hasConceptScore W2949440898C138885662 @default.
• W2949440898 hasConceptScore W2949440898C166957645 @default.
• W2949440898 hasConceptScore W2949440898C171878925 @default.
• W2949440898 hasConceptScore W2949440898C205649164 @default.
• W2949440898 hasConceptScore W2949440898C21931767 @default.
• W2949440898 hasConceptScore W2949440898C2776549017 @default.
• W2949440898 hasConceptScore W2949440898C41895202 @default.
• W2949440898 hasConceptScore W2949440898C95457728 @default.
• W2949440898 hasLocation W29494408981 @default.
• W2949440898 hasOpenAccess W2949440898 @default.
• W2949440898 hasPrimaryLocation W29494408981 @default.
• W2949440898 hasRelatedWork W1068579054 @default.
• W2949440898 hasRelatedWork W1972813760 @default.
• W2949440898 hasRelatedWork W1979366578 @default.
• W2949440898 hasRelatedWork W1996209729 @default.
• W2949440898 hasRelatedWork W2065971755 @default.
• W2949440898 hasRelatedWork W2172411162 @default.
• W2949440898 hasRelatedWork W2209768637 @default.
• W2949440898 hasRelatedWork W2322186225 @default.
• W2949440898 hasRelatedWork W2491128293 @default.
• W2949440898 hasRelatedWork W2497510627 @default.
• W2949440898 hasRelatedWork W2598173205 @default.
• W2949440898 hasRelatedWork W2727856667 @default.
• W2949440898 hasRelatedWork W2781181865 @default.
• W2949440898 hasRelatedWork W2797540120 @default.
• W2949440898 hasRelatedWork W2923217749 @default.
• W2949440898 hasRelatedWork W2969364969 @default.
• W2949440898 hasRelatedWork W3211332589 @default.
• W2949440898 hasRelatedWork W845368464 @default.
• W2949440898 hasRelatedWork W877994298 @default.
• W2949440898 hasRelatedWork W3088182078 @default.
• W2949440898 isParatext "false" @default.
• W2949440898 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W2949440898 magId "2949440898" @default.
• W2949440898 workType "article" @default.