Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2949666512> ?p ?o ?g. }
- W2949666512 endingPage "158" @default.
- W2949666512 startingPage "145" @default.
- W2949666512 abstract "Process Models (PM) are visual documentations of the business processes within or across enterprises. Activities (tasks) are arranged together into a model (i.e., similar to flowcharts). This study aimed at understanding the underlying structure of PM comprehension. Though standards for describing PM have been defined, the cognitive work load they evoke, their structure, and the efficacy of information transmission are only partially understood. Two studies were conducted to better differentiate the concept of visual literacy (VL) and logical reasoning in interpreting PM. Study I: A total of 1047 students from 52 school classes were assessed. Three different process models of increasing complexity were presented on tablets. Additionally, written labels of the models’ elements were randomly allocated to scholars in a 3-group between-subjects design. Comprehension of process models was assessed by a series of 3 × 4 (=12) dichotomous test items. Latent Class Analysis of solved items revealed 6 qualitatively differing solution patterns, suggesting that a single test score is insufficient to reflect participants’ performance. Study II: Overall, 21 experts and 15 novices with respect to visual literacy were presented the same set of PMs as in Study I, while wearing eye tracking glasses. The fixation duration on relevant parts of the PM and on questions were recorded, as well as the total time needed to solve all 12 test items. The number of gaze transitions between process model and comprehension questions was measured as well. Being an expert in visual literacy did not alter the capability of correctly understanding graphical logical PMs. Presenting PMs that are labelled by single letters had a significant influence on reducing the time spent on irrelevant model parts but did not affect the fixation duration on relevant areas of interest. Both samples’ participants required longer response times with increasing model complexity. The number of toggles (i.e., gaze transitions between model and statement area of interest) was predictive for membership in one of the latent classes. Contrary to expectations, denoting the PM events and decisions not with real-world descriptions, but with single letters, led to lower cognitive workload in responding to comprehension questions and to better results. Visual Literacy experts could neither outperform novices nor high-school students in comprehending PM." @default.
- W2949666512 created "2019-06-27" @default.
- W2949666512 creator A5007338190 @default.
- W2949666512 creator A5014789737 @default.
- W2949666512 creator A5015213318 @default.
- W2949666512 creator A5027602541 @default.
- W2949666512 creator A5034826290 @default.
- W2949666512 creator A5057899110 @default.
- W2949666512 creator A5075861532 @default.
- W2949666512 date "2019-12-01" @default.
- W2949666512 modified "2023-09-30" @default.
- W2949666512 title "Comprehension of business process models: Insight into cognitive strategies via eye tracking" @default.
- W2949666512 cites W1985493405 @default.
- W2949666512 cites W1985614661 @default.
- W2949666512 cites W1987675072 @default.
- W2949666512 cites W1994331787 @default.
- W2949666512 cites W1999127676 @default.
- W2949666512 cites W2009040334 @default.
- W2949666512 cites W2017410258 @default.
- W2949666512 cites W2024388174 @default.
- W2949666512 cites W2024456099 @default.
- W2949666512 cites W2048446386 @default.
- W2949666512 cites W2049579898 @default.
- W2949666512 cites W2050674259 @default.
- W2949666512 cites W2063907469 @default.
- W2949666512 cites W2065740937 @default.
- W2949666512 cites W2077829240 @default.
- W2949666512 cites W2083515851 @default.
- W2949666512 cites W2094608307 @default.
- W2949666512 cites W2094835394 @default.
- W2949666512 cites W2105539942 @default.
- W2949666512 cites W2107878864 @default.
- W2949666512 cites W2122143462 @default.
- W2949666512 cites W2131057562 @default.
- W2949666512 cites W2135995390 @default.
- W2949666512 cites W2136988047 @default.
- W2949666512 cites W2139357690 @default.
- W2949666512 cites W2153749840 @default.
- W2949666512 cites W2177345101 @default.
- W2949666512 cites W2204964561 @default.
- W2949666512 cites W2336445786 @default.
- W2949666512 cites W2466105807 @default.
- W2949666512 cites W2483275357 @default.
- W2949666512 cites W2567481661 @default.
- W2949666512 cites W2594780739 @default.
- W2949666512 cites W2620879918 @default.
- W2949666512 cites W2655457 @default.
- W2949666512 cites W2771386160 @default.
- W2949666512 cites W2791768395 @default.
- W2949666512 cites W2809024232 @default.
- W2949666512 cites W63499693 @default.
- W2949666512 cites W99471992 @default.
- W2949666512 doi "https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2019.06.032" @default.
- W2949666512 hasPublicationYear "2019" @default.
- W2949666512 type Work @default.
- W2949666512 sameAs 2949666512 @default.
- W2949666512 citedByCount "10" @default.
- W2949666512 countsByYear W29496665122020 @default.
- W2949666512 countsByYear W29496665122021 @default.
- W2949666512 countsByYear W29496665122022 @default.
- W2949666512 countsByYear W29496665122023 @default.
- W2949666512 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
- W2949666512 hasAuthorship W2949666512A5007338190 @default.
- W2949666512 hasAuthorship W2949666512A5014789737 @default.
- W2949666512 hasAuthorship W2949666512A5015213318 @default.
- W2949666512 hasAuthorship W2949666512A5027602541 @default.
- W2949666512 hasAuthorship W2949666512A5034826290 @default.
- W2949666512 hasAuthorship W2949666512A5057899110 @default.
- W2949666512 hasAuthorship W2949666512A5075861532 @default.
- W2949666512 hasBestOaLocation W29496665122 @default.
- W2949666512 hasConcept C111919701 @default.
- W2949666512 hasConcept C144024400 @default.
- W2949666512 hasConcept C146249460 @default.
- W2949666512 hasConcept C149923435 @default.
- W2949666512 hasConcept C151730666 @default.
- W2949666512 hasConcept C153050134 @default.
- W2949666512 hasConcept C154945302 @default.
- W2949666512 hasConcept C15744967 @default.
- W2949666512 hasConcept C169760540 @default.
- W2949666512 hasConcept C169900460 @default.
- W2949666512 hasConcept C177264268 @default.
- W2949666512 hasConcept C180747234 @default.
- W2949666512 hasConcept C199360897 @default.
- W2949666512 hasConcept C204321447 @default.
- W2949666512 hasConcept C2777212361 @default.
- W2949666512 hasConcept C2777267654 @default.
- W2949666512 hasConcept C2908647359 @default.
- W2949666512 hasConcept C41008148 @default.
- W2949666512 hasConcept C511192102 @default.
- W2949666512 hasConcept C56461940 @default.
- W2949666512 hasConcept C72041958 @default.
- W2949666512 hasConcept C86803240 @default.
- W2949666512 hasConcept C98045186 @default.
- W2949666512 hasConceptScore W2949666512C111919701 @default.
- W2949666512 hasConceptScore W2949666512C144024400 @default.
- W2949666512 hasConceptScore W2949666512C146249460 @default.
- W2949666512 hasConceptScore W2949666512C149923435 @default.
- W2949666512 hasConceptScore W2949666512C151730666 @default.