FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2949687025> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2949687025 abstract "Correspondence21 June 2019free access Response by the author Michael Hill [email protected] Swiss National Science Foundation, Bern, Switzerland Search for more papers by this author Michael Hill [email protected] Swiss National Science Foundation, Bern, Switzerland Search for more papers by this author Author Information Michael Hill1 1Swiss National Science Foundation, Bern, Switzerland EMBO Rep (2019)20:e48587https://doi.org/10.15252/embr.201948587 Reply to: A Horowitz (August 2019) PDFDownload PDF of article text and main figures. ToolsAdd to favoritesDownload CitationsTrack CitationsPermissions ShareFacebookTwitterLinked InMendeleyWechatReddit Figures & Info I agree with the commentator that the quality of reviews is highly variable in both publication and grant peer review and that these circumstances can lead to substantial differences and unfair decisions that disadvantage those affected. I also second his opinion that the publication of peer reviews may be the most effective way of addressing the problem. The publication of journal article peer reviews seems to me a straightforward and good solution, which I personally would like to see adopted as a standard and included in the evaluation and communication of all quality journals. The publication of grant peer reviews is somewhat more challenging, however, as grant applications usually relate to proposed future research and scientists may fear that their ideas would get disseminated prematurely and scooped by others. Grant peer review publication would therefore probably need to be suitably embargoed to ensure that the applicant's interests are protected and that the reviews can still be published in a timely manner. A possible solution could be that, early on in the evaluation process, reviews are shared with the applicants to give them the opportunity to respond and comment. Both the original peer review and the applicant's response would then be considered during the final evaluation process. Such a procedure has, to my knowledge, already been implemented by some funding agencies, such as the Netherlands Organisation for Scientific Research. The fact that both peer reviews and the rebuttal would be published after a suitable embargo would provide strong incentive for courteous, balanced and professional communication. In my view, the advantages most likely outweigh its inherent risks but we do not know for sure until we try. Therefore, to me the most important point in this discussion is that we keep on experimenting with different review systems and innovations because, as the commentator rightfully pointed out, the stakes are high. Previous ArticleNext Article Read MoreAbout the coverClose modalView large imageVolume 20,Issue 8,August 2019Endothelial cell protrusions termed kugeln in the head vasculature of transgenic zebrafish. Kugeln were visualized with transgenic reporter lines visualizing the endothelial cell membrane using light sheet fluorescence microscopy. By Elisabeth Kugler, Paul Armitage, Timothy Chico and colleagues: Cerebrovascular endothelial cells form transient Notch-dependent cystic structures in zebrafish. Scientific image by Elisabeth Kugler from the Infection, Immunity and Cardiovascular Disease Department, The University of Sheffield, United Kingdom. Volume 20Issue 81 August 2019In this issue RelatedDetailsLoading ..." @default.
• W2949687025 created "2019-06-27" @default.
• W2949687025 creator A5072225910 @default.
• W2949687025 date "2019-06-21" @default.
• W2949687025 modified "2023-10-11" @default.
• W2949687025 title "Response by the author" @default.
• W2949687025 doi "https://doi.org/10.15252/embr.201948587" @default.
• W2949687025 hasPubMedCentralId "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/6680114" @default.
• W2949687025 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/31267681" @default.
• W2949687025 hasPublicationYear "2019" @default.
• W2949687025 type Work @default.
• W2949687025 sameAs 2949687025 @default.
• W2949687025 citedByCount "0" @default.
• W2949687025 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2949687025 hasAuthorship W2949687025A5072225910 @default.
• W2949687025 hasBestOaLocation W29496870251 @default.
• W2949687025 hasConcept C111472728 @default.
• W2949687025 hasConcept C127413603 @default.
• W2949687025 hasConcept C138368954 @default.
• W2949687025 hasConcept C138885662 @default.
• W2949687025 hasConcept C144024400 @default.
• W2949687025 hasConcept C161191863 @default.
• W2949687025 hasConcept C17744445 @default.
• W2949687025 hasConcept C199539241 @default.
• W2949687025 hasConcept C2777673361 @default.
• W2949687025 hasConcept C2779455604 @default.
• W2949687025 hasConcept C2779530757 @default.
• W2949687025 hasConcept C2780966255 @default.
• W2949687025 hasConcept C39549134 @default.
• W2949687025 hasConcept C41008148 @default.
• W2949687025 hasConcept C42475967 @default.
• W2949687025 hasConceptScore W2949687025C111472728 @default.
• W2949687025 hasConceptScore W2949687025C127413603 @default.
• W2949687025 hasConceptScore W2949687025C138368954 @default.
• W2949687025 hasConceptScore W2949687025C138885662 @default.
• W2949687025 hasConceptScore W2949687025C144024400 @default.
• W2949687025 hasConceptScore W2949687025C161191863 @default.
• W2949687025 hasConceptScore W2949687025C17744445 @default.
• W2949687025 hasConceptScore W2949687025C199539241 @default.
• W2949687025 hasConceptScore W2949687025C2777673361 @default.
• W2949687025 hasConceptScore W2949687025C2779455604 @default.
• W2949687025 hasConceptScore W2949687025C2779530757 @default.
• W2949687025 hasConceptScore W2949687025C2780966255 @default.
• W2949687025 hasConceptScore W2949687025C39549134 @default.
• W2949687025 hasConceptScore W2949687025C41008148 @default.
• W2949687025 hasConceptScore W2949687025C42475967 @default.
• W2949687025 hasIssue "8" @default.
• W2949687025 hasLocation W29496870251 @default.
• W2949687025 hasLocation W29496870252 @default.
• W2949687025 hasLocation W29496870253 @default.
• W2949687025 hasOpenAccess W2949687025 @default.
• W2949687025 hasPrimaryLocation W29496870251 @default.
• W2949687025 hasRelatedWork W1567783204 @default.
• W2949687025 hasRelatedWork W1966910563 @default.
• W2949687025 hasRelatedWork W2102225671 @default.
• W2949687025 hasRelatedWork W2151422200 @default.
• W2949687025 hasRelatedWork W2354071464 @default.
• W2949687025 hasRelatedWork W2368813765 @default.
• W2949687025 hasRelatedWork W2400788906 @default.
• W2949687025 hasRelatedWork W2748952813 @default.
• W2949687025 hasRelatedWork W2899084033 @default.
• W2949687025 hasRelatedWork W2177721280 @default.
• W2949687025 hasVolume "20" @default.
• W2949687025 isParatext "false" @default.
• W2949687025 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W2949687025 magId "2949687025" @default.
• W2949687025 workType "article" @default.