FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2950283400> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2950283400 abstract "In 1985, the case of Gillick v West Norfolk and Wisbech Area Health Authority confirmed that it was lawful for a child under the age of sixteen to validly consent to their own medical treatment without parental knowledge or permission, provided that they had ‘sufficient understanding and intelligence to understand the nature and implications of the proposed treatment’. Hailed as a landmark case, Gillick has been explored extensively. Scholars have generally based their investigations on the narrative of the case that is provided in the published law reports. However, there is a more detailed story to be told, which can only be uncovered by examining the context in greater depth. Using ‘legal archaeology’, a methodology which as far as the author is aware, has not previously been used to study Gillick, this thesis conducts an analysis of the social and historic background of the litigation through an analysis of primary and secondary sources, including materials that have never previously been examined. The purpose of the analysis undertaken in this thesis is threefold. First, it offers new information on how the case of Gillick came about, through the incorporation of new information from primary materials into the historical record. It enriches the existing understanding of how this well-known landmark case reached the courts as a result of a strategic agenda to progress the campaign against ‘secret schoolgirl contraception’ and to ensure that society would protect traditional family values. Moreover, this thesis confirms that Gillick should be viewed as a ‘test case’ (for the purpose of this thesis the term ‘test case’ is treated as synonymous with strategic litigation and public interest litigation). Second, the examination of Gillick contributes to existing discussions of ‘test case’ litigation and provides an assessment of the key characteristics of a ‘test case’, as well as the role and function of ‘test cases’ in the English legal system. Finally, this analysis of Gillick adds to the current understandings of ‘legal archaeology’ which, at present, is not widely used, and thus its methodological potential has not yet been fully explored. This thesis draws conclusions about the process of conducting a 'legal archaeology' project, including its advantages and disadvantages. It advocates utilising ‘legal archaeology’ as an approach for the micro-level study of individual cases. It argues that ‘legal archaeology’ is well-suited to examining cases that are thought to be ‘test cases’ because of the emphasis that this methodology places on building an accurate narrative of how and why a particular case came into existence. This thesis further suggests that 'legal archaeology' should be adopted by scholars who wish to better understand the wider context of an individual case, as well as by those who wish to respond to macro-level questions, including those about the way cases are constructed, and the role ‘test case’ litigation plays in the English legal system." @default.
• W2950283400 created "2019-06-27" @default.
• W2950283400 creator A5023330109 @default.
• W2950283400 date "2018-07-01" @default.
• W2950283400 modified "2023-09-27" @default.
• W2950283400 title "Gillick v West Norfolk and Wisbech Area Health Authority [1986] AC 112 : an archaeological study of a test case" @default.
• W2950283400 hasPublicationYear "2018" @default.
• W2950283400 type Work @default.
• W2950283400 sameAs 2950283400 @default.
• W2950283400 citedByCount "0" @default.
• W2950283400 crossrefType "dissertation" @default.
• W2950283400 hasAuthorship W2950283400A5023330109 @default.
• W2950283400 hasConcept C124952713 @default.
• W2950283400 hasConcept C142362112 @default.
• W2950283400 hasConcept C144024400 @default.
• W2950283400 hasConcept C151730666 @default.
• W2950283400 hasConcept C166957645 @default.
• W2950283400 hasConcept C17744445 @default.
• W2950283400 hasConcept C199033989 @default.
• W2950283400 hasConcept C199539241 @default.
• W2950283400 hasConcept C2777267654 @default.
• W2950283400 hasConcept C2779343474 @default.
• W2950283400 hasConcept C53553401 @default.
• W2950283400 hasConcept C86803240 @default.
• W2950283400 hasConcept C95457728 @default.
• W2950283400 hasConceptScore W2950283400C124952713 @default.
• W2950283400 hasConceptScore W2950283400C142362112 @default.
• W2950283400 hasConceptScore W2950283400C144024400 @default.
• W2950283400 hasConceptScore W2950283400C151730666 @default.
• W2950283400 hasConceptScore W2950283400C166957645 @default.
• W2950283400 hasConceptScore W2950283400C17744445 @default.
• W2950283400 hasConceptScore W2950283400C199033989 @default.
• W2950283400 hasConceptScore W2950283400C199539241 @default.
• W2950283400 hasConceptScore W2950283400C2777267654 @default.
• W2950283400 hasConceptScore W2950283400C2779343474 @default.
• W2950283400 hasConceptScore W2950283400C53553401 @default.
• W2950283400 hasConceptScore W2950283400C86803240 @default.
• W2950283400 hasConceptScore W2950283400C95457728 @default.
• W2950283400 hasLocation W29502834001 @default.
• W2950283400 hasOpenAccess W2950283400 @default.
• W2950283400 hasPrimaryLocation W29502834001 @default.
• W2950283400 hasRelatedWork W104757718 @default.
• W2950283400 hasRelatedWork W1420628758 @default.
• W2950283400 hasRelatedWork W1482448585 @default.
• W2950283400 hasRelatedWork W1494639905 @default.
• W2950283400 hasRelatedWork W1572217843 @default.
• W2950283400 hasRelatedWork W188948702 @default.
• W2950283400 hasRelatedWork W2150445902 @default.
• W2950283400 hasRelatedWork W2195011417 @default.
• W2950283400 hasRelatedWork W2521753986 @default.
• W2950283400 hasRelatedWork W2615608448 @default.
• W2950283400 hasRelatedWork W2785162078 @default.
• W2950283400 hasRelatedWork W2790705031 @default.
• W2950283400 hasRelatedWork W3123355382 @default.
• W2950283400 hasRelatedWork W3123815846 @default.
• W2950283400 hasRelatedWork W3124107076 @default.
• W2950283400 hasRelatedWork W3124811846 @default.
• W2950283400 hasRelatedWork W622061114 @default.
• W2950283400 hasRelatedWork W651922756 @default.
• W2950283400 hasRelatedWork W986480453 @default.
• W2950283400 hasRelatedWork W3124900955 @default.
• W2950283400 isParatext "false" @default.
• W2950283400 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W2950283400 magId "2950283400" @default.
• W2950283400 workType "dissertation" @default.