Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2951356588> ?p ?o ?g. }
- W2951356588 endingPage "904" @default.
- W2951356588 startingPage "904" @default.
- W2951356588 abstract "<h3>Importance</h3> Posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) is a prevalent mental disorder, with a high risk of chronicity, comorbidity, and functional impairment; PTSD is complicated to treat, and the debate on the best treatment approach is ongoing. <h3>Objective</h3> To examine comparative outcomes and acceptability of psychotherapeutic and pharmacological treatments and their combinations in adults with PTSD. <h3>Data Sources</h3> Embase, MEDLINE, PsycINFO, Cochrane Controlled Trials Register, and PSYNDEX were searched for studies published from January 1, 1980, to February 28, 2018. Reference lists of included studies and of previously published guidelines and systematic reviews were also searched. <h3>Study Selection</h3> Of 11 417 records identified, 12 published randomized clinical trials (RCTs) comprising 922 participants, contributing 23 direct comparisons between psychotherapeutic and pharmacological treatments or their combinations were included. <h3>Data Extraction and Synthesis</h3> Standardized mean differences (SMDs) and odds ratios were aggregated using random-effects network and pairwise meta-analyses. Risk of bias and indirectness was rated for each study, and network confidence was rated using the Confidence in Network Meta-Analysis framework. <h3>Main Outcomes and Measures</h3> The primary outcome was the comparative benefit between 2 treatment approaches to PTSD symptom improvement, and secondary outcome was the comparative acceptability of the treatment approaches, as indicated by patient dropout rates before treatment termination. <h3>Results</h3> No treatment approach was found to be superior at the end of treatment (for all, 95% CI included 0). At the last follow-up, psychotherapeutic treatments showed greater benefit than pharmacological treatments in both network (SMD, −0.83; 95% CI, −1.59 to −0.07) and pairwise (SMD, −0.63; 95% CI, −1.18 to −0.09, 3 RCTs) meta-analyses. No difference was found between combined treatments and psychotherapeutic treatments at long-term follow-up, and combined treatments were associated with better outcomes than pharmacological treatments in the network meta-analysis (SMD, −0.96; 95% CI, −1.87 to −0.04), but not in the pairwise meta-analysis, which included 2 RCTs (SMD, −1.02; 95% CI, −2.77 to 0.72). No evidence was found for differential acceptability of the 3 treatment approaches. <h3>Conclusions and Relevance</h3> These results suggest superiority of psychotherapeutic treatments over pharmacological treatments; network, but not pairwise, meta-analyses suggest superiority of combined treatments over pharmacological treatments in improving PTSD symptom severity in the long term. The scarcity of reported long-term findings hampers definite conclusions and demonstrates the need for robust evidence from large-scaled comparative trials providing long-term follow-up data." @default.
- W2951356588 created "2019-06-27" @default.
- W2951356588 creator A5024160962 @default.
- W2951356588 creator A5042138222 @default.
- W2951356588 creator A5084243012 @default.
- W2951356588 date "2019-09-01" @default.
- W2951356588 modified "2023-10-15" @default.
- W2951356588 title "Comparative Efficacy and Acceptability of Pharmacological, Psychotherapeutic, and Combination Treatments in Adults With Posttraumatic Stress Disorder" @default.
- W2951356588 cites W1596491085 @default.
- W2951356588 cites W1897149844 @default.
- W2951356588 cites W1964268681 @default.
- W2951356588 cites W1980195366 @default.
- W2951356588 cites W1991606546 @default.
- W2951356588 cites W2003146587 @default.
- W2951356588 cites W2004474087 @default.
- W2951356588 cites W2004968176 @default.
- W2951356588 cites W2006748124 @default.
- W2951356588 cites W2012067430 @default.
- W2951356588 cites W2024929735 @default.
- W2951356588 cites W2039999929 @default.
- W2951356588 cites W2046229376 @default.
- W2951356588 cites W2049571898 @default.
- W2951356588 cites W2056154948 @default.
- W2951356588 cites W2056245842 @default.
- W2951356588 cites W2057344941 @default.
- W2951356588 cites W2064058955 @default.
- W2951356588 cites W2074147400 @default.
- W2951356588 cites W2075496165 @default.
- W2951356588 cites W2081065660 @default.
- W2951356588 cites W2087502097 @default.
- W2951356588 cites W2089149909 @default.
- W2951356588 cites W2100497492 @default.
- W2951356588 cites W2114214919 @default.
- W2951356588 cites W2118809134 @default.
- W2951356588 cites W2123056011 @default.
- W2951356588 cites W2125435699 @default.
- W2951356588 cites W2128537320 @default.
- W2951356588 cites W2129821518 @default.
- W2951356588 cites W2137981069 @default.
- W2951356588 cites W2142253768 @default.
- W2951356588 cites W2144269887 @default.
- W2951356588 cites W2153287976 @default.
- W2951356588 cites W2157134953 @default.
- W2951356588 cites W2159331204 @default.
- W2951356588 cites W2160475412 @default.
- W2951356588 cites W2163031982 @default.
- W2951356588 cites W2165822653 @default.
- W2951356588 cites W2200670010 @default.
- W2951356588 cites W2232977717 @default.
- W2951356588 cites W2332955098 @default.
- W2951356588 cites W2344705609 @default.
- W2951356588 cites W2593514681 @default.
- W2951356588 cites W2659552866 @default.
- W2951356588 cites W2780453452 @default.
- W2951356588 cites W2806188084 @default.
- W2951356588 cites W2903489897 @default.
- W2951356588 cites W2951356588 @default.
- W2951356588 cites W4230536449 @default.
- W2951356588 cites W4236740054 @default.
- W2951356588 cites W4236916541 @default.
- W2951356588 cites W4239960582 @default.
- W2951356588 cites W4241294122 @default.
- W2951356588 cites W4247665917 @default.
- W2951356588 cites W4252684789 @default.
- W2951356588 cites W4253704736 @default.
- W2951356588 cites W4292855834 @default.
- W2951356588 cites W4294215472 @default.
- W2951356588 cites W4297918764 @default.
- W2951356588 doi "https://doi.org/10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2019.0951" @default.
- W2951356588 hasPubMedCentralId "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/6563588" @default.
- W2951356588 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/31188399" @default.
- W2951356588 hasPublicationYear "2019" @default.
- W2951356588 type Work @default.
- W2951356588 sameAs 2951356588 @default.
- W2951356588 citedByCount "91" @default.
- W2951356588 countsByYear W29513565882019 @default.
- W2951356588 countsByYear W29513565882020 @default.
- W2951356588 countsByYear W29513565882021 @default.
- W2951356588 countsByYear W29513565882022 @default.
- W2951356588 countsByYear W29513565882023 @default.
- W2951356588 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
- W2951356588 hasAuthorship W2951356588A5024160962 @default.
- W2951356588 hasAuthorship W2951356588A5042138222 @default.
- W2951356588 hasAuthorship W2951356588A5084243012 @default.
- W2951356588 hasBestOaLocation W29513565881 @default.
- W2951356588 hasConcept C118552586 @default.
- W2951356588 hasConcept C126322002 @default.
- W2951356588 hasConcept C156957248 @default.
- W2951356588 hasConcept C168563851 @default.
- W2951356588 hasConcept C17744445 @default.
- W2951356588 hasConcept C199539241 @default.
- W2951356588 hasConcept C2779159551 @default.
- W2951356588 hasConcept C2779473830 @default.
- W2951356588 hasConcept C2779549880 @default.
- W2951356588 hasConcept C70410870 @default.
- W2951356588 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
- W2951356588 hasConcept C95190672 @default.
- W2951356588 hasConceptScore W2951356588C118552586 @default.