Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2951491940> ?p ?o ?g. }
- W2951491940 abstract "ABSTRACT Objective The digits-in-noise test (DIN) has become increasingly popular as a consumer-based method to screen for hearing loss. Current versions of all DINs either test ears monaurally or present identical stimuli binaurally (i.e., diotic noise and speech, N o S o ). Unfortunately, presentation of identical stimuli to each ear inhibits detection of unilateral sensorineural hearing loss (SNHL), and neither diotic nor monaural presentation sensitively detects conductive hearing loss (CHL). Following an earlier finding of enhanced sensitivity in normally hearing listeners, this study tested the hypothesis that interaural antiphasic digit presentation (N o S π ) would improve sensitivity to hearing loss caused by unilateral or asymmetric SNHL, symmetric SNHL, or CHL. Design This cross-sectional study, recruited adults (18-84 years) with various levels of hearing, based on a four-frequency pure tone average (PTA) at 0.5, 1, 2 and 4kHz. The study sample was comprised of listeners with normal hearing ( n =41; PTA ≤ 25 dB HL in both ears), symmetric SNHL ( n =57; PTA > 25 dB HL), unilateral or asymmetric SNHL ( n =24; PTA > 25 dB HL in the poorer ear) and CHL ( n =23; PTA > 25 dB HL and PTA air-bone gap ≥ 20 dB HL in the poorer ear). Antiphasic and diotic speech reception thresholds (SRTs) were compared using a repeated-measures design. Results Antiphasic DIN was significantly more sensitive to all three forms of hearing loss than the diotic DIN. SRT test-retest reliability was high for all tests (ICC r > 0.89). Area under the receiver operating characteristics (ROC) curve for detection of hearing loss (> 25 dB HL) was higher for antiphasic DIN (0.94) than for diotic DIN (0.77) presentation. After correcting for age, PTA of listeners with normal hearing or symmetric SNHL was more strongly correlated with antiphasic ( r partial [96]=0.69) than diotic ( r partial =0.54) SRTs. Slope of fitted regression lines predicting SRT from PTA was significantly steeper for antiphasic than diotic DIN. For listeners with normal hearing or CHL, antiphasic SRTs were more strongly correlated with PTA ( r partial [62]=0.92) than diotic SRTs ( r partial [62]=0.64). Slope of regression line with PTA was also significantly steeper for antiphasic than diotic DIN. Severity of asymmetric hearing loss (poorer ear PTA) was unrelated to SRT. No effect of self-reported English competence on either antiphasic or diotic DIN among the mixed first-language participants was observed Conclusions Antiphasic digit presentation markedly improved the sensitivity of the DIN test to detect SNHL, either symmetric or asymmetric, while keeping test duration to a minimum by testing binaurally. In addition, the antiphasic DIN was able to detect CHL, a shortcoming of previous monaural or binaurally diotic DIN versions. The antiphasic DIN is thus a powerful tool for population-based screening. This enhanced functionality combined with smartphone delivery could make the antiphasic DIN suitable as a primary screen that is accessible to a large global audience." @default.
- W2951491940 created "2019-06-27" @default.
- W2951491940 creator A5010024024 @default.
- W2951491940 creator A5025450865 @default.
- W2951491940 creator A5027728332 @default.
- W2951491940 creator A5064785970 @default.
- W2951491940 creator A5073696011 @default.
- W2951491940 date "2019-06-21" @default.
- W2951491940 modified "2023-09-26" @default.
- W2951491940 title "Improving Sensitivity of the Digits-in-Noise Test using Antiphasic Stimuli" @default.
- W2951491940 cites W1968228527 @default.
- W2951491940 cites W1969185449 @default.
- W2951491940 cites W1969377882 @default.
- W2951491940 cites W1980991962 @default.
- W2951491940 cites W1988176644 @default.
- W2951491940 cites W1988749075 @default.
- W2951491940 cites W1991850640 @default.
- W2951491940 cites W1995438880 @default.
- W2951491940 cites W1999676468 @default.
- W2951491940 cites W2002835989 @default.
- W2951491940 cites W2006687352 @default.
- W2951491940 cites W2008713487 @default.
- W2951491940 cites W2019176413 @default.
- W2951491940 cites W2020796330 @default.
- W2951491940 cites W2028890384 @default.
- W2951491940 cites W2029869066 @default.
- W2951491940 cites W2032525163 @default.
- W2951491940 cites W2035411672 @default.
- W2951491940 cites W2036771453 @default.
- W2951491940 cites W2041118149 @default.
- W2951491940 cites W2042244292 @default.
- W2951491940 cites W2051240593 @default.
- W2951491940 cites W2051951610 @default.
- W2951491940 cites W2052700054 @default.
- W2951491940 cites W2052916596 @default.
- W2951491940 cites W2073609542 @default.
- W2951491940 cites W2092188102 @default.
- W2951491940 cites W2096363656 @default.
- W2951491940 cites W2103565913 @default.
- W2951491940 cites W2138784466 @default.
- W2951491940 cites W2139190150 @default.
- W2951491940 cites W2147530538 @default.
- W2951491940 cites W2148501761 @default.
- W2951491940 cites W2171600170 @default.
- W2951491940 cites W2173265531 @default.
- W2951491940 cites W2293983617 @default.
- W2951491940 cites W2315192251 @default.
- W2951491940 cites W2321250446 @default.
- W2951491940 cites W2324814322 @default.
- W2951491940 cites W2327484320 @default.
- W2951491940 cites W2342853324 @default.
- W2951491940 cites W2418026350 @default.
- W2951491940 cites W2527824850 @default.
- W2951491940 cites W2610919838 @default.
- W2951491940 cites W2612569016 @default.
- W2951491940 cites W2626811573 @default.
- W2951491940 cites W2736307756 @default.
- W2951491940 cites W2770351264 @default.
- W2951491940 cites W2770505727 @default.
- W2951491940 cites W2789605964 @default.
- W2951491940 cites W2791951599 @default.
- W2951491940 cites W2900732427 @default.
- W2951491940 cites W4238660626 @default.
- W2951491940 doi "https://doi.org/10.1101/677609" @default.
- W2951491940 hasPublicationYear "2019" @default.
- W2951491940 type Work @default.
- W2951491940 sameAs 2951491940 @default.
- W2951491940 citedByCount "1" @default.
- W2951491940 countsByYear W29514919402020 @default.
- W2951491940 crossrefType "posted-content" @default.
- W2951491940 hasAuthorship W2951491940A5010024024 @default.
- W2951491940 hasAuthorship W2951491940A5025450865 @default.
- W2951491940 hasAuthorship W2951491940A5027728332 @default.
- W2951491940 hasAuthorship W2951491940A5064785970 @default.
- W2951491940 hasAuthorship W2951491940A5073696011 @default.
- W2951491940 hasBestOaLocation W29514919401 @default.
- W2951491940 hasConcept C102894143 @default.
- W2951491940 hasConcept C2780493683 @default.
- W2951491940 hasConcept C2780607864 @default.
- W2951491940 hasConcept C33923547 @default.
- W2951491940 hasConcept C548259974 @default.
- W2951491940 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
- W2951491940 hasConceptScore W2951491940C102894143 @default.
- W2951491940 hasConceptScore W2951491940C2780493683 @default.
- W2951491940 hasConceptScore W2951491940C2780607864 @default.
- W2951491940 hasConceptScore W2951491940C33923547 @default.
- W2951491940 hasConceptScore W2951491940C548259974 @default.
- W2951491940 hasConceptScore W2951491940C71924100 @default.
- W2951491940 hasLocation W29514919401 @default.
- W2951491940 hasLocation W29514919402 @default.
- W2951491940 hasOpenAccess W2951491940 @default.
- W2951491940 hasPrimaryLocation W29514919401 @default.
- W2951491940 hasRelatedWork W1972533368 @default.
- W2951491940 hasRelatedWork W1978411611 @default.
- W2951491940 hasRelatedWork W1979536146 @default.
- W2951491940 hasRelatedWork W1987154696 @default.
- W2951491940 hasRelatedWork W1992890239 @default.
- W2951491940 hasRelatedWork W1993434917 @default.
- W2951491940 hasRelatedWork W1994714406 @default.
- W2951491940 hasRelatedWork W2009622627 @default.