FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2952283588> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2952283588 endingPage "66.e6" @default.
• W2952283588 startingPage "66.e1" @default.
• W2952283588 abstract "Purpose Triceps-sparing (TS) approaches have been reported to provide improved triceps strength, better patient outcomes, and a lower incidence of complications in primary total elbow arthroplasty (TEA). It remains unclear whether the advantages of this approach are similar in the revision setting, especially in cases with prior triceps detachment. The purpose of this study was to compare triceps strength and clinical outcomes between TS and triceps-detaching (TD) approaches in revision TEA. Methods All revision TEAs performed over a 17-year period with a minimum 1-year follow-up were retrospectively reviewed. Elbows with preoperative triceps insufficiency or subsequent component removal for infection were excluded. Patients were grouped according to the surgical approach performed at the last revision TEA. Outcome measures included triceps strength, range of motion, visual analog scale (VAS), Mayo Elbow Performance Score (MEPS), and Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (DASH) scores. Results Ten TS and 6 TD elbows were evaluated. Four elbows within the TS group had documented TD surgery prior to revision. Median follow-up was longer in the TD group (137 ± 75 months vs 53 ± 20 months). Functional strength and DASH scores were significantly better in the TS group. Arc of motion, VAS, and MEPS were similar between the TS and the TD groups. Conclusions The TS approach preserves greater postoperative functional triceps strength after revision TEA, regardless of the type of approach used previously. Type of study/level of evidence Therapeutic V. Triceps-sparing (TS) approaches have been reported to provide improved triceps strength, better patient outcomes, and a lower incidence of complications in primary total elbow arthroplasty (TEA). It remains unclear whether the advantages of this approach are similar in the revision setting, especially in cases with prior triceps detachment. The purpose of this study was to compare triceps strength and clinical outcomes between TS and triceps-detaching (TD) approaches in revision TEA. All revision TEAs performed over a 17-year period with a minimum 1-year follow-up were retrospectively reviewed. Elbows with preoperative triceps insufficiency or subsequent component removal for infection were excluded. Patients were grouped according to the surgical approach performed at the last revision TEA. Outcome measures included triceps strength, range of motion, visual analog scale (VAS), Mayo Elbow Performance Score (MEPS), and Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (DASH) scores. Ten TS and 6 TD elbows were evaluated. Four elbows within the TS group had documented TD surgery prior to revision. Median follow-up was longer in the TD group (137 ± 75 months vs 53 ± 20 months). Functional strength and DASH scores were significantly better in the TS group. Arc of motion, VAS, and MEPS were similar between the TS and the TD groups. The TS approach preserves greater postoperative functional triceps strength after revision TEA, regardless of the type of approach used previously." @default.
• W2952283588 created "2019-06-27" @default.
• W2952283588 creator A5012673474 @default.
• W2952283588 creator A5038246688 @default.
• W2952283588 creator A5044992117 @default.
• W2952283588 creator A5068372151 @default.
• W2952283588 creator A5074671158 @default.
• W2952283588 creator A5077374736 @default.
• W2952283588 creator A5079233608 @default.
• W2952283588 date "2020-01-01" @default.
• W2952283588 modified "2023-10-03" @default.
• W2952283588 title "A Clinical Comparison of Triceps-Sparing and Triceps-Detaching Approaches for Revision Total Elbow Arthroplasty" @default.
• W2952283588 cites W1828177271 @default.
• W2952283588 cites W1950831395 @default.
• W2952283588 cites W1976022419 @default.
• W2952283588 cites W2004291132 @default.
• W2952283588 cites W2007842010 @default.
• W2952283588 cites W2017491370 @default.
• W2952283588 cites W2020058646 @default.
• W2952283588 cites W2028880142 @default.
• W2952283588 cites W2032851535 @default.
• W2952283588 cites W2057384393 @default.
• W2952283588 cites W2060342803 @default.
• W2952283588 cites W2066314060 @default.
• W2952283588 cites W2083609360 @default.
• W2952283588 cites W2113321702 @default.
• W2952283588 cites W2203389904 @default.
• W2952283588 cites W2266039851 @default.
• W2952283588 cites W2321047407 @default.
• W2952283588 cites W2472079323 @default.
• W2952283588 cites W2475397423 @default.
• W2952283588 cites W2480368755 @default.
• W2952283588 cites W2537804859 @default.
• W2952283588 cites W2600576645 @default.
• W2952283588 cites W2615945417 @default.
• W2952283588 cites W4245444519 @default.
• W2952283588 cites W4296315177 @default.
• W2952283588 doi "https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhsa.2019.05.002" @default.
• W2952283588 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/31227203" @default.
• W2952283588 hasPublicationYear "2020" @default.
• W2952283588 type Work @default.
• W2952283588 sameAs 2952283588 @default.
• W2952283588 citedByCount "6" @default.
• W2952283588 countsByYear W29522835882019 @default.
• W2952283588 countsByYear W29522835882021 @default.
• W2952283588 countsByYear W29522835882022 @default.
• W2952283588 countsByYear W29522835882023 @default.
• W2952283588 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2952283588 hasAuthorship W2952283588A5012673474 @default.
• W2952283588 hasAuthorship W2952283588A5038246688 @default.
• W2952283588 hasAuthorship W2952283588A5044992117 @default.
• W2952283588 hasAuthorship W2952283588A5068372151 @default.
• W2952283588 hasAuthorship W2952283588A5074671158 @default.
• W2952283588 hasAuthorship W2952283588A5077374736 @default.
• W2952283588 hasAuthorship W2952283588A5079233608 @default.
• W2952283588 hasConcept C111919701 @default.
• W2952283588 hasConcept C141071460 @default.
• W2952283588 hasConcept C14184104 @default.
• W2952283588 hasConcept C1862650 @default.
• W2952283588 hasConcept C2776090536 @default.
• W2952283588 hasConcept C2778336525 @default.
• W2952283588 hasConcept C2781184374 @default.
• W2952283588 hasConcept C41008148 @default.
• W2952283588 hasConcept C60465272 @default.
• W2952283588 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W2952283588 hasConceptScore W2952283588C111919701 @default.
• W2952283588 hasConceptScore W2952283588C141071460 @default.
• W2952283588 hasConceptScore W2952283588C14184104 @default.
• W2952283588 hasConceptScore W2952283588C1862650 @default.
• W2952283588 hasConceptScore W2952283588C2776090536 @default.
• W2952283588 hasConceptScore W2952283588C2778336525 @default.
• W2952283588 hasConceptScore W2952283588C2781184374 @default.
• W2952283588 hasConceptScore W2952283588C41008148 @default.
• W2952283588 hasConceptScore W2952283588C60465272 @default.
• W2952283588 hasConceptScore W2952283588C71924100 @default.
• W2952283588 hasFunder F4320310009 @default.
• W2952283588 hasIssue "1" @default.
• W2952283588 hasLocation W29522835881 @default.
• W2952283588 hasOpenAccess W2952283588 @default.
• W2952283588 hasPrimaryLocation W29522835881 @default.
• W2952283588 hasRelatedWork W1988578910 @default.
• W2952283588 hasRelatedWork W2017066969 @default.
• W2952283588 hasRelatedWork W2417013795 @default.
• W2952283588 hasRelatedWork W2737434827 @default.
• W2952283588 hasRelatedWork W2973108776 @default.
• W2952283588 hasRelatedWork W3151218357 @default.
• W2952283588 hasRelatedWork W4207086275 @default.
• W2952283588 hasRelatedWork W4245524627 @default.
• W2952283588 hasRelatedWork W4319461179 @default.
• W2952283588 hasRelatedWork W94312556 @default.
• W2952283588 hasVolume "45" @default.
• W2952283588 isParatext "false" @default.
• W2952283588 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W2952283588 magId "2952283588" @default.
• W2952283588 workType "article" @default.