FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2952660369> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2952660369 endingPage "2144" @default.
• W2952660369 startingPage "2131" @default.
• W2952660369 abstract "The construction of rank hierarchies based on agonistic interactions between two individuals (9dyads9) is an important component in the characterization of the social structure of groups. To this end, winner-loser matrices are typically created, which collapse the outcome of dyadic interactions over time, resulting in the loss of all information contained in the temporal domain. Methods that track changes in the outcome of dyadic interactions (such as 9Elo-scores9) are experiencing increasing interest. Critically, individual scores are not just based on the succession of wins and losses, but depend on the values of starting scores and an update (9tax9) coefficient. Recent studies improved existing methods by introducing a point estimation of these auxiliary parameters on the basis of a maximum likelihood (ML) approach. For a sound assessment of the rank hierarchies generated this way, we argue that measures of uncertainty of the estimates, as well as a quantification of the robustness of the methods, are also needed. We introduce a Bayesian inference (BI) approach using 9partial pooling9, which rests on the assumption that all starting scores are samples from the same distribution. We compare the outcome of the ML approach to that of the BI approach using real-world data. In addition, we simulate different scenarios to explore in which way the Elo-score responds to social events (such as rank takeovers), and low numbers of observations. Estimates of the starting scores based on 9partial pooling9 are more robust than those based on ML, also in scenarios where some individuals have only few observations. Our simulations show that assumed rank differences may fall well within the 9uncertain9 range, and that low sampling density, unbalanced designs, and coalitionary leaps involving several individuals within the hierarchy may yield unreliable results. Our results support the view that Elo rating can be a powerful tool in the analysis of social behaviour, when the data meet certain criteria. Assessing the uncertainty greatly aids in the interpretation of results. We strongly advocate running simulation approaches to test how well Elo scores reflect the (simulated) 9true9 structure, and how sensitive the score is to 9true9 changes in the hierarchy." @default.
• W2952660369 created "2019-06-27" @default.
• W2952660369 creator A5055379189 @default.
• W2952660369 creator A5057885203 @default.
• W2952660369 creator A5060389273 @default.
• W2952660369 date "2018-09-04" @default.
• W2952660369 modified "2023-09-26" @default.
• W2952660369 title "Bayesian inference and simulation approaches improve the assessment of Elo‐ratings in the analysis of social behaviour" @default.
• W2952660369 cites W1612949680 @default.
• W2952660369 cites W1852628838 @default.
• W2952660369 cites W1917223209 @default.
• W2952660369 cites W1961437620 @default.
• W2952660369 cites W1979577615 @default.
• W2952660369 cites W1980252650 @default.
• W2952660369 cites W1981495705 @default.
• W2952660369 cites W1982118397 @default.
• W2952660369 cites W1991769471 @default.
• W2952660369 cites W1997691616 @default.
• W2952660369 cites W1997990636 @default.
• W2952660369 cites W2034452626 @default.
• W2952660369 cites W2073241381 @default.
• W2952660369 cites W2092769250 @default.
• W2952660369 cites W2093321049 @default.
• W2952660369 cites W2103165137 @default.
• W2952660369 cites W2105090664 @default.
• W2952660369 cites W2109943494 @default.
• W2952660369 cites W2138323474 @default.
• W2952660369 cites W2139114918 @default.
• W2952660369 cites W2145087767 @default.
• W2952660369 cites W2155197011 @default.
• W2952660369 cites W2156318148 @default.
• W2952660369 cites W2160473404 @default.
• W2952660369 cites W2162185655 @default.
• W2952660369 cites W2166445788 @default.
• W2952660369 cites W2418723869 @default.
• W2952660369 cites W2530340704 @default.
• W2952660369 cites W2552883701 @default.
• W2952660369 cites W2577537660 @default.
• W2952660369 cites W2589591446 @default.
• W2952660369 cites W2592455293 @default.
• W2952660369 cites W2596511353 @default.
• W2952660369 cites W4229930971 @default.
• W2952660369 cites W2072423237 @default.
• W2952660369 doi "https://doi.org/10.1111/2041-210x.13072" @default.
• W2952660369 hasPublicationYear "2018" @default.
• W2952660369 type Work @default.
• W2952660369 sameAs 2952660369 @default.
• W2952660369 citedByCount "9" @default.
• W2952660369 countsByYear W29526603692019 @default.
• W2952660369 countsByYear W29526603692020 @default.
• W2952660369 countsByYear W29526603692022 @default.
• W2952660369 countsByYear W29526603692023 @default.
• W2952660369 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2952660369 hasAuthorship W2952660369A5055379189 @default.
• W2952660369 hasAuthorship W2952660369A5057885203 @default.
• W2952660369 hasAuthorship W2952660369A5060389273 @default.
• W2952660369 hasBestOaLocation W29526603692 @default.
• W2952660369 hasConcept C104317684 @default.
• W2952660369 hasConcept C105795698 @default.
• W2952660369 hasConcept C107673813 @default.
• W2952660369 hasConcept C114614502 @default.
• W2952660369 hasConcept C144237770 @default.
• W2952660369 hasConcept C148220186 @default.
• W2952660369 hasConcept C149782125 @default.
• W2952660369 hasConcept C154945302 @default.
• W2952660369 hasConcept C160234255 @default.
• W2952660369 hasConcept C164226766 @default.
• W2952660369 hasConcept C185592680 @default.
• W2952660369 hasConcept C2776214188 @default.
• W2952660369 hasConcept C33923547 @default.
• W2952660369 hasConcept C41008148 @default.
• W2952660369 hasConcept C55493867 @default.
• W2952660369 hasConcept C63479239 @default.
• W2952660369 hasConcept C70437156 @default.
• W2952660369 hasConceptScore W2952660369C104317684 @default.
• W2952660369 hasConceptScore W2952660369C105795698 @default.
• W2952660369 hasConceptScore W2952660369C107673813 @default.
• W2952660369 hasConceptScore W2952660369C114614502 @default.
• W2952660369 hasConceptScore W2952660369C144237770 @default.
• W2952660369 hasConceptScore W2952660369C148220186 @default.
• W2952660369 hasConceptScore W2952660369C149782125 @default.
• W2952660369 hasConceptScore W2952660369C154945302 @default.
• W2952660369 hasConceptScore W2952660369C160234255 @default.
• W2952660369 hasConceptScore W2952660369C164226766 @default.
• W2952660369 hasConceptScore W2952660369C185592680 @default.
• W2952660369 hasConceptScore W2952660369C2776214188 @default.
• W2952660369 hasConceptScore W2952660369C33923547 @default.
• W2952660369 hasConceptScore W2952660369C41008148 @default.
• W2952660369 hasConceptScore W2952660369C55493867 @default.
• W2952660369 hasConceptScore W2952660369C63479239 @default.
• W2952660369 hasConceptScore W2952660369C70437156 @default.
• W2952660369 hasIssue "10" @default.
• W2952660369 hasLocation W29526603691 @default.
• W2952660369 hasLocation W29526603692 @default.
• W2952660369 hasOpenAccess W2952660369 @default.
• W2952660369 hasPrimaryLocation W29526603691 @default.
• W2952660369 hasRelatedWork W2753218748 @default.
• W2952660369 hasRelatedWork W2774409638 @default.

• next