FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2953327467> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2953327467 endingPage "378" @default.
• W2953327467 startingPage "371" @default.
• W2953327467 abstract "Background Foot ulceration is the most frequently recognized lower extremity complication in diabetic patients. Predicting wound healing is an essential step in the management of diabetic foot ulcers (DFUs), as it is estimated that early detection and appropriate treatments may prevent up to 85% of amputations. Toe systolic blood pressure (TBP) is a quick and portable bedside assessment and is less affected by medial sclerosis of arteries present in the diabetic population compared to other measurements like ankle–brachial index. This systematic review seeks to evaluate the sensitivity and specificity of toe pressure in prediction of DFU wound healing. Methods PubMed/MEDLINE and EMBASE databases were systematically searched up to September 20, 2017 in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. All randomized control, prospective and retrospective trials were considered for inclusion if they reported healing rates of DFUs with respect to different TBP readings. Healing was defined to be intact skin for at least 6 months or at time of death. Quality assessment of articles was performed using the RevMan Quality Assessment. Information on healing rates with respect to different TBP values was extracted. Summary estimates of sensitivity and specificity of TBP in predicting healing of DFU wounds were obtained using a bivariate model. Results A total of 580 articles were screened. Eight studies (6 prospective and 2 retrospective) inclusive of 909 patients were eligible for inclusion. It was found that a TBP of more than 30 mm Hg is associated with a sensitivity and specificity of 0.86 and 0.58 respectively for healing of DFUs. Conclusions A TBP of more than 30 mm Hg is sensitive but not specific in the prediction of healing of DFUs. Due to its portability and quick analysis, TBP may be used as a bedside assessment to complement current clinical parameters to aid in predicting the healing of diabetic foot ulcers. Foot ulceration is the most frequently recognized lower extremity complication in diabetic patients. Predicting wound healing is an essential step in the management of diabetic foot ulcers (DFUs), as it is estimated that early detection and appropriate treatments may prevent up to 85% of amputations. Toe systolic blood pressure (TBP) is a quick and portable bedside assessment and is less affected by medial sclerosis of arteries present in the diabetic population compared to other measurements like ankle–brachial index. This systematic review seeks to evaluate the sensitivity and specificity of toe pressure in prediction of DFU wound healing. PubMed/MEDLINE and EMBASE databases were systematically searched up to September 20, 2017 in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. All randomized control, prospective and retrospective trials were considered for inclusion if they reported healing rates of DFUs with respect to different TBP readings. Healing was defined to be intact skin for at least 6 months or at time of death. Quality assessment of articles was performed using the RevMan Quality Assessment. Information on healing rates with respect to different TBP values was extracted. Summary estimates of sensitivity and specificity of TBP in predicting healing of DFU wounds were obtained using a bivariate model. A total of 580 articles were screened. Eight studies (6 prospective and 2 retrospective) inclusive of 909 patients were eligible for inclusion. It was found that a TBP of more than 30 mm Hg is associated with a sensitivity and specificity of 0.86 and 0.58 respectively for healing of DFUs. A TBP of more than 30 mm Hg is sensitive but not specific in the prediction of healing of DFUs. Due to its portability and quick analysis, TBP may be used as a bedside assessment to complement current clinical parameters to aid in predicting the healing of diabetic foot ulcers." @default.
• W2953327467 created "2019-06-27" @default.
• W2953327467 creator A5000252568 @default.
• W2953327467 creator A5009424710 @default.
• W2953327467 creator A5040219006 @default.
• W2953327467 creator A5043620545 @default.
• W2953327467 creator A5079509707 @default.
• W2953327467 creator A5086911332 @default.
• W2953327467 date "2019-10-01" @default.
• W2953327467 modified "2023-09-26" @default.
• W2953327467 title "Toe Pressure in Predicting Diabetic Foot Ulcer Healing: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis" @default.
• W2953327467 cites W1536510965 @default.
• W2953327467 cites W1965274195 @default.
• W2953327467 cites W1968038365 @default.
• W2953327467 cites W1974305185 @default.
• W2953327467 cites W1976722755 @default.
• W2953327467 cites W1991974656 @default.
• W2953327467 cites W2000919540 @default.
• W2953327467 cites W2005501262 @default.
• W2953327467 cites W2019419595 @default.
• W2953327467 cites W2043126620 @default.
• W2953327467 cites W2073434274 @default.
• W2953327467 cites W2075996160 @default.
• W2953327467 cites W2090292533 @default.
• W2953327467 cites W2101705397 @default.
• W2953327467 cites W2109240610 @default.
• W2953327467 cites W2109578591 @default.
• W2953327467 cites W2126268334 @default.
• W2953327467 cites W2126727011 @default.
• W2953327467 cites W2132049202 @default.
• W2953327467 cites W2135233586 @default.
• W2953327467 cites W2153188402 @default.
• W2953327467 cites W2171997231 @default.
• W2953327467 cites W2202835946 @default.
• W2953327467 cites W2261074806 @default.
• W2953327467 cites W2626354203 @default.
• W2953327467 cites W3134167119 @default.
• W2953327467 cites W4236938366 @default.
• W2953327467 doi "https://doi.org/10.1016/j.avsg.2019.04.011" @default.
• W2953327467 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/31220591" @default.
• W2953327467 hasPublicationYear "2019" @default.
• W2953327467 type Work @default.
• W2953327467 sameAs 2953327467 @default.
• W2953327467 citedByCount "12" @default.
• W2953327467 countsByYear W29533274672020 @default.
• W2953327467 countsByYear W29533274672021 @default.
• W2953327467 countsByYear W29533274672022 @default.
• W2953327467 countsByYear W29533274672023 @default.
• W2953327467 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2953327467 hasAuthorship W2953327467A5000252568 @default.
• W2953327467 hasAuthorship W2953327467A5009424710 @default.
• W2953327467 hasAuthorship W2953327467A5040219006 @default.
• W2953327467 hasAuthorship W2953327467A5043620545 @default.
• W2953327467 hasAuthorship W2953327467A5079509707 @default.
• W2953327467 hasAuthorship W2953327467A5086911332 @default.
• W2953327467 hasConcept C126322002 @default.
• W2953327467 hasConcept C134018914 @default.
• W2953327467 hasConcept C141071460 @default.
• W2953327467 hasConcept C168563851 @default.
• W2953327467 hasConcept C17744445 @default.
• W2953327467 hasConcept C188816634 @default.
• W2953327467 hasConcept C189708586 @default.
• W2953327467 hasConcept C199539241 @default.
• W2953327467 hasConcept C2777858829 @default.
• W2953327467 hasConcept C2778144972 @default.
• W2953327467 hasConcept C2779473830 @default.
• W2953327467 hasConcept C2908647359 @default.
• W2953327467 hasConcept C555293320 @default.
• W2953327467 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W2953327467 hasConcept C95190672 @default.
• W2953327467 hasConcept C99454951 @default.
• W2953327467 hasConceptScore W2953327467C126322002 @default.
• W2953327467 hasConceptScore W2953327467C134018914 @default.
• W2953327467 hasConceptScore W2953327467C141071460 @default.
• W2953327467 hasConceptScore W2953327467C168563851 @default.
• W2953327467 hasConceptScore W2953327467C17744445 @default.
• W2953327467 hasConceptScore W2953327467C188816634 @default.
• W2953327467 hasConceptScore W2953327467C189708586 @default.
• W2953327467 hasConceptScore W2953327467C199539241 @default.
• W2953327467 hasConceptScore W2953327467C2777858829 @default.
• W2953327467 hasConceptScore W2953327467C2778144972 @default.
• W2953327467 hasConceptScore W2953327467C2779473830 @default.
• W2953327467 hasConceptScore W2953327467C2908647359 @default.
• W2953327467 hasConceptScore W2953327467C555293320 @default.
• W2953327467 hasConceptScore W2953327467C71924100 @default.
• W2953327467 hasConceptScore W2953327467C95190672 @default.
• W2953327467 hasConceptScore W2953327467C99454951 @default.
• W2953327467 hasLocation W29533274671 @default.
• W2953327467 hasLocation W29533274672 @default.
• W2953327467 hasOpenAccess W2953327467 @default.
• W2953327467 hasPrimaryLocation W29533274671 @default.
• W2953327467 hasRelatedWork W2077321957 @default.
• W2953327467 hasRelatedWork W2183209921 @default.
• W2953327467 hasRelatedWork W2530350521 @default.
• W2953327467 hasRelatedWork W2763046336 @default.
• W2953327467 hasRelatedWork W2982199195 @default.
• W2953327467 hasRelatedWork W3039894954 @default.
• W2953327467 hasRelatedWork W3046011215 @default.

• next