FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2953748929> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2953748929 endingPage "103520" @default.
• W2953748929 startingPage "103520" @default.
• W2953748929 abstract "Abstract To guarantee port accessibility, navigation approach channels need to be well maintained. Annual dredging efforts to maintain navigable channels may well exceed tens of millions m 3 of sediment per year, which results in high recurrent costs for port operators. Quantification of expected siltation rates with process-based numerical models helps to effectively design and optimise approach channels. The setup of such models requires several assumptions and parameter settings which introduce uncertainty in model output. However, traditional Monte Carlo methods to quantify that uncertainty in model output are often too resource-intensive with current standard computer resources to be feasibly applied in coastal engineering projects such as approach channel design. Here, we use an alternative multifidelity approach to estimate the probability density function of channel siltation, at lower computational costs compared to direct Monte Carlo simulation. The idea behind this method is to map the output uncertainty of a faster, but inaccurate model to a preferred high-detailed model. The key requirement is that the faster, low-fidelity model and the detailed high-fidelity model are correlated, and that his correlation can be modelled with a probabilistic function. Since linearity of the correlation is not a requirement, the coarse-grid model can be very inaccurate but still serve as an adequate predictor of the high-fidelity model. In this study we did observe a highly nonlinear correlation, which in our case is explained by underestimation of channel siltation near the surf zone by the coarse model. In the presented multifidelity approach we adopted a combination of quasi-random Monte Carlo simulation and a non-parametric Gaussian process transfer function to estimate the uncertainty of total siltation and spatial patterns of siltation in a port approach channel. We argue that the multifidelity approach is conceptually straightforward and found that it can be used to significantly decrease the costs of probabilistic analysis; in our case we found a 85% decrease compared to direct Monte Carlo simulation. An additional advantage is that the approach allows for a trade-off between precision and efficiency by varying the number of high-fidelity model runs. Therefore, we conclude that the multifidelity framework is a potential powerful alternative for cases in which direct Monte Carlo simulation is infeasible or undesirable." @default.
• W2953748929 created "2019-07-12" @default.
• W2953748929 creator A5034759142 @default.
• W2953748929 creator A5045123390 @default.
• W2953748929 creator A5045322252 @default.
• W2953748929 creator A5046768298 @default.
• W2953748929 creator A5070149963 @default.
• W2953748929 creator A5091488124 @default.
• W2953748929 date "2019-10-01" @default.
• W2953748929 modified "2023-09-26" @default.
• W2953748929 title "Towards efficient uncertainty quantification with high-resolution morphodynamic models: A multifidelity approach applied to channel sedimentation" @default.
• W2953748929 cites W1528483814 @default.
• W2953748929 cites W1536497620 @default.
• W2953748929 cites W1565509570 @default.
• W2953748929 cites W1935773568 @default.
• W2953748929 cites W1971179885 @default.
• W2953748929 cites W1976791986 @default.
• W2953748929 cites W1977046327 @default.
• W2953748929 cites W1996945619 @default.
• W2953748929 cites W2017489029 @default.
• W2953748929 cites W2028067548 @default.
• W2953748929 cites W2029767409 @default.
• W2953748929 cites W2033394978 @default.
• W2953748929 cites W2036691956 @default.
• W2953748929 cites W2045860903 @default.
• W2953748929 cites W2054529442 @default.
• W2953748929 cites W2055040448 @default.
• W2953748929 cites W2057352841 @default.
• W2953748929 cites W2064102000 @default.
• W2953748929 cites W2075492136 @default.
• W2953748929 cites W2075966418 @default.
• W2953748929 cites W2076155531 @default.
• W2953748929 cites W2079884250 @default.
• W2953748929 cites W2082484980 @default.
• W2953748929 cites W2083253722 @default.
• W2953748929 cites W2087719296 @default.
• W2953748929 cites W2093625674 @default.
• W2953748929 cites W2104957534 @default.
• W2953748929 cites W2113548869 @default.
• W2953748929 cites W2116113264 @default.
• W2953748929 cites W2121745948 @default.
• W2953748929 cites W2138162665 @default.
• W2953748929 cites W2144810631 @default.
• W2953748929 cites W2155232809 @default.
• W2953748929 cites W2159555138 @default.
• W2953748929 cites W2173246082 @default.
• W2953748929 cites W2217402295 @default.
• W2953748929 cites W2221579883 @default.
• W2953748929 cites W2273282267 @default.
• W2953748929 cites W2296345902 @default.
• W2953748929 cites W2495358219 @default.
• W2953748929 cites W2497060941 @default.
• W2953748929 cites W2529002538 @default.
• W2953748929 cites W2568283272 @default.
• W2953748929 cites W2593388048 @default.
• W2953748929 cites W2808531198 @default.
• W2953748929 doi "https://doi.org/10.1016/j.coastaleng.2019.103520" @default.
• W2953748929 hasPublicationYear "2019" @default.
• W2953748929 type Work @default.
• W2953748929 sameAs 2953748929 @default.
• W2953748929 citedByCount "7" @default.
• W2953748929 countsByYear W29537489292021 @default.
• W2953748929 countsByYear W29537489292022 @default.
• W2953748929 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2953748929 hasAuthorship W2953748929A5034759142 @default.
• W2953748929 hasAuthorship W2953748929A5045123390 @default.
• W2953748929 hasAuthorship W2953748929A5045322252 @default.
• W2953748929 hasAuthorship W2953748929A5046768298 @default.
• W2953748929 hasAuthorship W2953748929A5070149963 @default.
• W2953748929 hasAuthorship W2953748929A5091488124 @default.
• W2953748929 hasBestOaLocation W29537489292 @default.
• W2953748929 hasConcept C114793014 @default.
• W2953748929 hasConcept C119857082 @default.
• W2953748929 hasConcept C127162648 @default.
• W2953748929 hasConcept C127313418 @default.
• W2953748929 hasConcept C159390177 @default.
• W2953748929 hasConcept C16156107 @default.
• W2953748929 hasConcept C187320778 @default.
• W2953748929 hasConcept C2816523 @default.
• W2953748929 hasConcept C29941650 @default.
• W2953748929 hasConcept C3020199158 @default.
• W2953748929 hasConcept C32230216 @default.
• W2953748929 hasConcept C39432304 @default.
• W2953748929 hasConcept C41008148 @default.
• W2953748929 hasConcept C62649853 @default.
• W2953748929 hasConcept C65589250 @default.
• W2953748929 hasConcept C76155785 @default.
• W2953748929 hasConcept C76886044 @default.
• W2953748929 hasConceptScore W2953748929C114793014 @default.
• W2953748929 hasConceptScore W2953748929C119857082 @default.
• W2953748929 hasConceptScore W2953748929C127162648 @default.
• W2953748929 hasConceptScore W2953748929C127313418 @default.
• W2953748929 hasConceptScore W2953748929C159390177 @default.
• W2953748929 hasConceptScore W2953748929C16156107 @default.
• W2953748929 hasConceptScore W2953748929C187320778 @default.
• W2953748929 hasConceptScore W2953748929C2816523 @default.
• W2953748929 hasConceptScore W2953748929C29941650 @default.
• W2953748929 hasConceptScore W2953748929C3020199158 @default.

• next